Desktop version

Home arrow Psychology arrow The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention

References

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E.D. (1997). Intelligence, personality and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219- 245.

Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Pierce, C. A. (2010). Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 648-680. doi: 10.1037/a0018714.

Alfonso, V. C., Flanagan, D. P., & Radwan, S. (2007). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment, Theories, Tests, and Issues (2nd ed., pp. 185-202). New York: Guilford Press.

Alonso, P., Moscoso, S., & Cuadrado, D. (2015). Personnel selection procedures in Spanish small and medium size organizations. Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 31, 79-89.

Ali, O., Gamer, I., & Magadley, W. (2009). An investigation ofthe relationship among personality, cognitive ability, emotional intelligence, and counterproductive workplace behaviors: Results from UAE Police. 8th Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conference, 25-28 June, Sydney, Australia.

American Educational Research Association (AERA). (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hulsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291-304.

Anderson, N., & Witvliet, C. (2008). Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: An international comparison between The Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 1-13.

Barros, E., Kausel, E. E., Cuadra, F., & Diaz, D. A. (2014). Using general mental ability and personality traits to predict job performance in three Chilean organizations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 432-438.

Bartholomew, D. J., Deary, I. J., & Lawn, M. (2009). A new lease of life for Thomson’s bonds model of intelligence. Psychological Review, 116, 567-579.

Bartram, D., & Baxter, P. (1996). Validation of the Cathay Pacific Airways pilot selection program. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 149-169.

Bauer, T. N., Maertz, C. P., Dolen, M. R., & Campion, M. A. (1998). Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 892-903.

Bauer, T. N., McCarthy, J., Anderson, N., Truxillo, D. M., & Salgado, J. F. (2012). What We Know About Applicant Reactions To Selection: Research Summary and Best Practices. SIOP White Paper Series. Bowling Green, OH: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Baumgartl, V. O., & Primi, R. (2011). Evidencias de validade da Bateria de provas de raciocionio (BPR-5) para a selec^ao de pessoal. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 19, 246-251.

Beauducel, A., & Kersting, M. (2002).Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin Model of Intelligence structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 97-112.

Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1982). Differential Aptitude Tests. New York: Psychological Corporation.

Berry, C. M., Clark, M. A., & McClure, T. K. (2011). Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion- related validity of cognitive ability tests: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 881-906.

Berry, C. M., Cullen, M. J., & Meyer, J. M. (2014). Racial/ethnic subgroup differences in cognitive ability test range restriction: Implications for differential validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 21-37.

Berry, C. M., & Zhao, P. (2015). Addressing criticism of existing predictive bias research: Cognitive ability test scores still overpredict African Americans’ job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 110, 162-179.

Bertolino, M., & Steiner, D. D. (2007). Fairness reactions to selection methods: An Italian study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 107-205.

Bertua, C., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 387-409.

Bilgic, R., & Acarlar, G. (2010). Fairness perceptions of selection instruments used in Turkey. Paper presented at the XIIth Congress of the Turkish Psychological Association, Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Psychology, 30, 17-24.

Black, J. (2000). Personality testing and police selection: Utility of the ‘Big Five’. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29, 2-9.

Bobko, P., & Roth, P. L. (2013). Reviewing, categorizing, and analyzing the literature on Black- White mean differences for predictors of job performance: Verifying some perceptions and updating/correcting others. Personnel Psychology, 66, 91-126.

Burt, C. (1909). Experimental tests of general intelligence. British Psychological Psychology, 3, 94-177.

Campbell, S., & Cattano, V. M. (2004). Using measures of specific abilities to predict training performance in Canadian Forces operator occupations. Military Psychology, 16, 183-201.

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Castro-Solano, A., & Casullo, M. M. (2005). Estilos de personalidad, afrontamiento e inteligencia como predictores de las trayectorias academicas de cadetes en una institucion militar. Anales de Psicologia, 36, 197-210.

Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22. doi: 10.1037/h0046743.

Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its Structure, Growth, and Action. New York: North Holland.

Cattell, R. B., & Horn, J. L. (1978). A check of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with description of new subtest design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 139-164.

Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job performance. Human Performance, 15, 233-254.

Chan, D., Schmitt, N., Jennings, D., Clause, C. S., & Delbridge, K. (1998). Applicant perceptions of test fairness: Integrating justice and self-serving bias perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 232-239.

Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2007). 2007 Recruitment, Retention, and Turnover Survey. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Cobero, C., Primi, R., & Muniz, M. (2006). Inteligencia emocional e desempenho no trabalho: Un estudo com MSCEIT, BPR-5, e 16PF. Paidtia, 16, 337-348.

Cuadra-Peralta, A. (1990). Un modelo matematico de seleccion basado en validez concurrente. Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 6.

Dale, G. J. (2010). Predicting learner performance in the clothing industry. Unpublished master’s thesis. Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.

Dany, F., & Torchy, V. (1994). Recruitment and selection in Europe: Policies, practices and methods. In C. Brewster & A. Hegewisch (Eds.), Policy and Practice in European Human Resource Management: The Price Waterhouse Cranfield Survey. London: Routledge.

Deary, I. J. (2012). Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 453-482.

De Jong, A. V. D. (2000). Black and White employees’ fairness perceptions of personnel selection techniques. South African Journal of Psychology, 30, 17-24.

De Kock, F., & Schlechter, A. (2009). Fluid intelligence and spatial reasoning as predictors of pilot training performance. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35, 1-8.

De Meijer, L. A. L., Born, M. P., Terlouw, G., & van der Molen, H. T. (2010). Applicant and method factors related to ethnic score differences in personnel selection: A study at the Dutch police. Human Performance, 19, 219-251.

De Wolff, C., & Van der Bosch, G. (1984) Personnel selection. In P. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, P. J. Willems & C. J. de Wolff (Eds.), European Handbook OfWork and Organizational Psychology (pp. 33-58). Chichester: Wiley.

Di Milia, L., Smith, P. A., & Brown, D. F. (1994). Management selection in Australia: A comparison with British and French findings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 80-90.

Fertig, S. (2009). The incremental validity of a situational judgment test (SJT) relative to personality and cognitive ability to predict managerial performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, Stellenboch University, South Africa.

Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S., & Ortiz, S. (2000). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc theory: A Contemporary Approach and Interpretation. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Forbes, A. (2006). The predictive validity of the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ 32i) in assessing competence in the workplace. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Gamliel, E., & Peer, E. (2009). Effect of framing on applicants’ reactions to personnel selection methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 282-289.

Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The Validity of Occupational Aptitude Tests. New York: Wiley.

Ghiselli, E. E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 26, 461-477.

Gilliland, S. W., & Steiner, D. I. (2012). Applicant reactions to testing and selection. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Personnel Assessment and Selection (pp. 629-668). New York: Oxford University Press.

Goldstein, H. W., Scherbaum, C. A., & Yusko, K. P. (2010). Revisiting g: Intelligence, adverse impact, and personnel selection. In J. L. Outz (Ed.), Adverse Impact. Implications for Organizational Staffing and High Stakes Selection (pp. 95-134). New York. Routledge.

Gonzalez-Mule, E., Mount, M. K., & Oh, IS. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1222-1243.

Gowing, M. K., & Slivinski, L. W. (1994). A review of North American selection procedures: Canada and United States of America. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 103-114.

Green, T., & Macqueen, P. (2008). Cognitive ability. How important? Unpublished manuscript. Queensland, Australia: Compass Consulting.

Guenole, N., Englert, P., & Taylor, P. J. (2003). Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability test scores within a New Zealand applicant sample. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 32, 49-54.

Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1992). The ‘Spearman hypothesis’ is false. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 265-267.

Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.

Hartigan, J. A., & Wigdor, A. K. (Eds.) (1989). Fairness in Employment Testing: Validity Generalization, Minority Issues, and The General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Heylighen, F. (1999). Collective intelligence and its implementation on the web: Algorithms to develop a collective mental map. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5, 253-280.

Hirsh, H. R., Northrop, L. C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1986). Validity generalization results for law enforcement occupations. Personnel Psychology, 39, 399-420.

Holzinger, K., & Swineford, F. (1937).The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41-54.

Horn, J. L. (1965). Fluid and crystallized intelligence: A factor analytic study of the structure among primary mental abilities. Ph.D. Thesis: University of Illinois.

Horn, J. (1989). Models of intelligence. In R L. Linn (Ed.), Intelligence:Measurement, Theory, and Public Policy (pp. 29-73). Urbana, IL: Illinois University Press.

Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection, and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.

Hulsheger, U. R., Maier, G. W., & Stumpp, T. (2007). Validity of general mental ability for the prediction of job performance and training success in Germany: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 3-18.

Humphreys, L. G. (1983).The hierarchical model and general intelligence. In N. Hirschberg & L. G. Humphreys (Eds.), Multivariate Applications in the Social Sciences (pp. 223-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hunt, E. A. (2011). Human Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hunter, J. E. (1983). Test Validation for 12,000jobs: An Application of Job Classification and Validity Generalization Analysis to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, US Employment Service.

Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340-362.

Hunter, J. E., & Hirsh, H. R (1987). Applications of meta-analysis. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 321-357). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Racial and gender bias in ability and achievement tests: resolving the apparent paradox. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6, 151.

Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, R. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721-735.

Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2006). Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 594-612. doi: 10.1037/0021 9010.91.3.594

Ispas, D., Ilie, A., Iliescu, D., Johnson, R. E., & Harris, M. M. (2010). Fairness reactions to selection methods: A Romanian study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 102-110.

Jager, A. O. (1967). Dimensionen der Intelligenz [Dimensions of Intelligence]. Gottinge, Germany: Hogrefe.

Jager, A. O. (1982). Mehrmodale Klassification von intelligenzleistungen: Experimentell kontrollierte weiterentwicklung eines deskriptiven intelligenzstrukturmodells. [Multimodal classification of intelligence tests: Experimentally controlled development of a descriptive model of intelligence structure]. Gottingen: Hogrefe.

Jager, A. O. (1984). Intelligenzstruktur fortschung: Konkurriende modelle, neue entwicklungen, perspektiven [Research on intelligence structure: Competing models, new developments, perspectives]. PsychologischeRundau, 35, 21-35.

Jenrich, R. I., & Bentler, P. M. (2011). Exploratory bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 76, 537-549.

Jensen, A. R. (1998). Theg Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Wesport, CT: Praeger.

Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 258-282.

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005a).The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393-416.

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005b).Constructive replication of the visual-perceptual image rotation model of Thurstone’s (1941) battery of 60 tests of mental ability. Intelligence, 33, 417-430.

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2007). Sex differences in mental abilities: g masks the dimensions on which they lie. Intelligence, 35, 23-39.

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2011). The MISTRA data: Forty-two mental ability tests in three batteries. Intelligence, 39, 82-88.

Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Gottesman, I. I. (2004). Just one g: Consistent results from three test batteries. Intelligence, 32, 95-107.

Johnson, W., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bouchard, T. J. (2008). Still just 1 g: Consistent results from five test batteries. Intelligence, 36, 81-95.

Jonsdottir, J. H., & Hafsteinson, L. G. (2008). Sanngimi atta adferda sem notadar eru vid starfsman- naval: Vidbrogd Islendinga [Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods in Iceland]. Salfradiritd, 13, 109-125.

Krantowitz, T. M. (2014). 2014 Global Assessment Trends Report. Surrey: CEB-SHL.

Kriek, H., & Dowdeswell, K. (2009). Adverse impact & validity evidence in South Africa: 12 years of data trends. Unpublished manuscript. SHL, South Africa.

Kriek, H., & Dowdeswell, K. (2010). Adverse impact in South Africa. In J. L. Outz (Ed.), Adverse Impact. Implications for Organizational Staffing and High Stakes Selection (pp. 375-399). New York: Routledge.

Kvist, V., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2008). The relation between fluid intelligence and the general as a function of cultural background: A test of Cattell’s investment theory. Intelligence, 36, 422-436.

Lang, J. W. B., Kersting, M., Hulsheger, U. T., & Lang, J. (2010). General mental ability, narrower cognitive abilities, and job performance: The perspective of the nested-factors model of cognitive abilities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 595-640.

Lee, S. (2005). Cross-cultural validity of personality for predicting job performance of Korean engineers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

Levine, E. L., Spector, P. E., Menon, P. E., Narayanon, L., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (1996). Validity generalization for cognitive, psychomotor, and perceptual tests for craft jobs in the utility industry. Human Performance, 9, 1-22.

Mann, C. (2011). Cognitive ability and job performance in a New Zealand service organization. Unpublished master’s thesis. Massey University, New Zealand.

Marcus, B. (2003). Attitudes towards personnel selection methods: A partial replication and extension in a German sample. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 515-532.

Marsden, P. V. (1994). Selection methods in US establishments. Acta Sociologica, 37, 287-301.

Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2013). Test of slope and intercept bias in college admissions: A response to Aguinis, Culpepper, and Pierce (2010). Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 134-147.

McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (pp. 151-180). New York: Guilford Press.

McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. L., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: the relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.

Meade, A. W. (2004). Psychometric problems and issues involved with creating and using ipsative measures for selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 531-552.

Moreno-Garcia, H. E. (2011). Identificarlas variables psicometricas criticas para la seleccion de candidates al puesto de ejecutivo de servicio telefonico, en una empresa del sector financiero. Unpublished master’s thesis, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2004). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 187-196.

Mount, M. K., Oh, I.-S., & Burns, M. (2008). Incremental validity of perceptual speed and accuracy over general mental ability. Personnel Psychology, 61, 113-139.

Muller, J., & Schepers, J. (2003). The predictive validity of the selection battery used for junior leader training within the South African National Defense Force. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 87-98.

Murphy, K. R. (2002). Can conflicting perspectives on the role of g in personnel selection be resolved? Human Performance, 15, 173-186.

Myors, B., Livenes, F., Schollaert, E., van Hoye, G., ... & Sackett, P. R. (2008). International perspectives on the legal environment for selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 206-246.

Nicholls, M., Viviers, A. M., & Visser, D. (2009). Validation of a test battery for the selection of call centre operators in a communications company. South African Journal of Psychology, 39, 19-31.

Nikolaou, I., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Greece. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 206-219.

Nimura, H., Ishashiro, S., & Naito, J. (2000). A meta-analysis and validity generalization study of a personnel test and a general cognitive test for measuring managerial aptitude. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science, 13, 159-167.

Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130-159.

Oh, I.-S. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and job performance in East Asia: A crosscultural validity generalization study. International Personnel Assessment Council, Assessment Council News, 10-19.

Oh, I.-S., Schmidt, F. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Le, H. (2008). The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is even more valid than we thought: A new development in meta-analysis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 563-570.

Olea, M. M., & Ree, M. J. (1994). Predicting pilot and navigator criteria: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 845-851.

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). Cognitive abilities. In N. Schmitt (Ed.). Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection (pp. 179-224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Salgado, J. F. (2010). Cognitive abilities. In N. Tippins & J. Farr (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 255-275). New York: Routledge.

Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for test used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 569-607.

Pelser, M., Berg, Z. C., & Visser, D. (2005). The concurrent validity of learning potential and psychomotor ability measures for the selection of haul truck operators in an openpit mine. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31, 58-70.

Pereira, F. M., Primi, R., & Cobero, C. (2003). Validade de testes utilizados em sele^ao de pessoal segundo recrutadores. Psicologia: teoria e Pratica, 5, 83-98.

Phillips, J. M., & Gully S. M. (2002). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Singapore and the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 1186-1205.

Posthlethwite, B. E. (2011). Fluid ability, crystallized ability, and performance across multiple domains: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (1998). General cognitive ability and occupational performance. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review ofIndustrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 159-184). London: Wiley.

Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321-332.

Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal Applied Psychology, 79, 518-524.

Reeve, C. L., & Hackel, M. D. (2002). Asking the right questions aboutg. Human Performance, 15, 47-74.

Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bi-factor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment., 92, 544-559.

Roberts, B. W., Harms, P.D., Caspi, A., & Moffit, T. E. (2005). Predicting the counterproductive employee in a child-to-adult prospective study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1427-1436.

Rosales-Lopez, P. P. (2012). Uso del test de aptitudes mecanicas de MacQuarrie en la seleccion de personal para mejorar la productividad. Unpublished master’s thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.

Roth, P. L., Bevier, C. A., Bobko, P., Witzer III, F. S., & Tyler, P. (2001). Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 54, 297-330.

Roth, P. L., Le, H., Oh, I.-S, Van Iddekinge, C. H., Buster, M. A., Robbins, S. B., & Campion, M. A. (2014). Differential validity for cognitive ability tests in employment and educational settings: Not much more than range restriction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1-21.

Rothstein, H. R. (1990). Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322-327.

Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H., & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359-391.

Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008). High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63, 215-227.

Salgado, J. F. (1999). Personnel selection methods. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1999 (Vol. 14, pp. 1-54). Chichester: Wiley.

Salgado, J. F. (2001). Some landmarks of 100 years of scientific personnel selection at the beginning of the new century. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 3-8.

Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. (2002). Cognitive and GMA testing in the European Community: Issues and evidence. Human Performance, 15, 75-96.

Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. (2003a). Validity generalization of GMA tests across countries in the European Community. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 1-17.

Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. A. (2003b). Homogeneity in diversity: GMA validity across countries in the European Community. In H. K. Sinangil, F. Avalone & A. Caetano (Eds.), Homogeneity in Diversity. London: Psychology Press.

Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., & Hulsheger, U. R. (2010). Employee selection in Europe: Psychotechnics and the forgotten history of modern scientific employee selection. In N. Tippins & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 921-941). New York: Routledge.

Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & De Fruyt, F. (2003a). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European Community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.

Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J. P. (2003b). A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1068-1081.

Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., & Tauriz, G. (2015). The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced- choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 797-834.

Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (1996). Meta-analysis of the interrater reliability of job performance ratings in validity studies of personnel selection. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 1195-1201.

Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Berges, A. (2013). Conscientiousness, its facets, and the prediction of job performance ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 74-84.

Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., Sanchez, J. I., Alonso, P., Choragwicka, B., & Berges, A. (2015). Validity of the five-factor model and their facets: The impact of performance measure and facet residu- alization on the bandwidth-fidelity debate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 1-25.

Salgado, J. F., Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). A new look at the predictors in personnel selection. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), International Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1). London: Sage.

Salgado, J. F., & Tauriz, G. (2014). The five-factor model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 3-30.

Scherbaum, C. A., Goldstein, H. W., Yusko, K. P., Ryan, R., & Hanges, P. J. (2012). Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a research program ong in I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 128-148.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.

Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Caplan, J. R (1981). Validity generalization results for two job groups in the petroleum industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 261-273.

Schmidt, F. L., Ones, D. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Personnel selection. Annual Review ofPsychology, 43, 671-710.

Schmitt, N. (2014). Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of effective performance at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 45-65.

Schmitt, N., Clause, C., & Pulakos, E. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job relevant constructs. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 115-140). Chichester: Wiley.

Schmitt, N., & Fandre, J. (2008). Validity of selection procedures. In S. Cartwright & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Psychology (pp. 163-192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.

Scroggins, W. A., Benson, P. G., Cross, C., & Gilbreath, B. (2008). Reactions to selection methods: An international comparison. International Journal of Management, 25, 203-216.

Shackleton, V., & Newell, S. (1994). European management selection methods: A comparison of five countries. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 91-104.

Sidaviciute, S. (2008). Attitudes toward personnel selection methods in Lithuanian and Swedish samples. Unpublished master’s thesis. Vaxjo University, Lithuania.

Snyder, C., & Shahani-Denning, C. (2012). Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: A look at professionals in Mumbai. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 297-307.

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2003). Principles for Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures. Bowling Green, OH: SIOP.

Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal ofPsychology, 15, 201-293.

Spearman, C. (1927). The Abilities of Man. Their Nature and Measurement. London: Macmillan.

Steiner, D. I., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 124-141.

Stern, W. (1912). Die Psychologischenmethoden der Inteligezprufung. Berlin, Germany [in English: The Psychological Methods of Testing Intelligence. Trans. G. M. Whipple. Baltimore, MD: Warwick, 1914].

Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is Intelligence? Contemporary Viewpoints on its Nature and Definition. New York: Abblex Publishing.

Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., & Brancart, S. (1999). Les reactions des candidates envers les techniques de selection du personnel: Une etude dans un contexte francophone [Reactions of job applicants to personnel selection techniques: An investigation in a French-speaking context]. Le Travail Humain, 62, 347-361.

Strachan, E. J. (2008). APIL-SV as a predictor of job performance in a South African financial consulting firm. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Swineford, F. (1949). General, verbal, and spatial bi-factors after three years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 353-360.

Taylor, P., Keelty, Y., & McDonnell, B. (2002). Evolving personnel selection practices in New Zealand organisations and recruitment firms. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 31, 8-18.

Taylor, P. J., Mills, A., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (1993). Personnel selection methods used by New Zealand organizations and personnel consulting firms. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 22, 19-31.

te Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (1997). Comparability of GATB scores for immigrants and majority group members: Some Dutch findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 675-687.

Thadeu, S. H., & Ferreira, M. C. (2013). The validity of psychological assessment in a selection process in the area of public safety. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion, 117-145.

Thomson, G. H. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271-281.

Thomson, G. H. (1919). On the cause of hierarchical order among the correlation coefficients of a number of variates taken in pairs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 95, 400-408.

Thomson, G. H. (1951). The Factorial Analysis ofHuman Ability (3rd ed.). London: University of London Press.

Thurstone, L. L. (1924). The Nature of Intelligence. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary Mental Abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1941). Factorial Studies of Intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tonindandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 1-9.

van der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wilcherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raajmakers, M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 13, 842-860.

Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., Dyomina, N. V., Morewitz, C. L., & Reilly, R. R. (2006). Forced-choice personality tests: A measure of personality and cognitive ability? Human Performance, 19, 175-199.

Vernon, P. E. (1957). The Structure ofHuman Abilities. New York: Wiley.

Vernon, P. E. (1971). The Structure ofHuman Abilities (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Vinchur, A. J., & Koppes, L. L. (2011). A historical survey of research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Building and Developing the Organization (Vol. 1, pp. 3-36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Vinchur, A. K., & Koppes-Bryan, L. L. (2012). A history of personnel selection and assessment. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Personnel Assessment and Selection (pp. 9-30). New York: Oxford University Press.

Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574. doi: 10.1037/0021- 9010.81.4.557.

Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hasmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686-688.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >