Desktop version

Home arrow Psychology arrow The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention


Arthur, W. J., Glaze, R. M., Jarrett, S. M., White, C. D., Schurig, I., & Taylor, J. E. (2014). Comparative evaluation of three situational judgement test response formats in terms of construct-related validity, subgroup differences, and susceptibility to response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 535-545. doi: 10.1037/a0035788.

Arthur, W. J., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435-442. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.435.

Bobko, P., & Roth, P. L. (2013). Reviewing, categorizing, and analyzing the literature on Black- White mean differences for predictors of job performance: Verifying some perceptions and updating/correcting others. Personnel Psychology, 66, 91-126. doi:10.1111/Peps.12007

Bruk-Lee, V., Drew, E. N., & Hawkes, B. (2014). Candidate reactions to simulations and media-rich assessments in personnel selection. In M. S. Fetzer & K. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for Personnel Selection (pp. 43-60). New York: Springer.

Campion, M. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2013). Assessing personality with situational judgement measures: Interactionist psychology operationalized. In N. D. Christiansen & R. P. Tett (Eds.), Handbook of Personality at Work (pp. 439-456). New York: Routledge.

Campion, M. C., Ployhart, R. E., & MacKenzie, W. (2014). The state of research on situational judgement tests: A content analysis and directions for future research. Human Performance, 27, 283-310.

Catano, V. M., Brochu, A., & Lamerson, C. D. (2012). Assessing the reliability of situational judgement tests used in high-stakes situations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 333-346. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00604.x.

Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (1997). Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgement tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 143-159. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.143.

Christian, M. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. (2010). Situational judgement tests: Constructs assessed and a meta-analysis of their criterion-related validities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 83-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01163.x.

Clause, C. S., Mullins, M. E., Nee, M. T., Pulakos, E., & Schmitt, N. (1998). Parallel test form development: A procedure for alternate predictors and an example. Personnel Psychology, 51, 193-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00722.x.

Crook, A. E., Beier, M. E., Cox, C. B., Kell, H. J., Hanks, A. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2011). Measuring relationships between personality, knowledge, and performance using single-response situational judgement tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 363-373. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00565.x.

Cullen, M. J., Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2006). Threats to the operational use of situational judgement tests in the college admission process. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 142-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00340.x.

De Soete, B., Lievens, F., Oostrom, J. K., & Westerveld, L. (2013). Alternative predictors for dealing with the diversity-validity dilemma in personnel selection: The constructed response multimedia test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 239-250. doi: 10.1111/ ijsa.12034.

Dunlop, P. D., Morrison, D. L., & Cordery, J. L. (2011). Investigating retesting effects in a personnel selection context. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 217-221. doi: 10.1111/ j.1468-2389.2011.00549.x.

Fetzer, M. S., & Tuzinski, K. (2014). Simulations for Personnel Selection. New York: Springer.

Fetzer, M. S., Tuzinski, K., & Freeman, M. (2010). 3D animation, motion capture, and SJTs: I O is finally catching up with it. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, April. Atlanta, GA.

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358. doi: 10.1037/h0061470.

Fritzsche, B. A., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S. (2006). Enhancing the design, delivery, and evaluation of scenario-based training: Can situational judgement tests contribute? In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgement Tests: Theory, Measurement, and Application (pp. 301-318). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ghosh, K., Motowidlo, S. J., & Nath, S. (2014). Effects of prosocial and technical knowledge on students’ clinical performance. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, May, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639-683. doi: 10.1111/j.1744- 6570.2004.00003.x.

Hooper, A. C., Cullen, M. C., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Operational threats to the use of SJTs: Faking, coaching, and retesting issues. In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgement Tests: Theory, Measurement, and Application (pp. 205-232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kanning, U. P., Grewe, K., Hollenberg, S., & Hadouch, M. (2006). From the subjects’ point of view: Reactions to different types of situational judgement items. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 168-176. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.168.

Kasten, N., & Freund, P. A. (2015). A meta-analytical multilevel reliability generalization of situational judgement tests (SJTs). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. doi: 10.1027/1015- 5759/a000250.

Kell, H. J., Martin, M. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2011). Medical students’ knowledge about medical professionalism predicts their professionalism performance. Poster presented at the 26 th Annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, April, Chicago, IL.

Kell, H. J., Motowidlo, S. J., Martin, M. P., Stotts, A. L., & Moreno, C. A. (2014). Testing for independent effects of prosocial knowledge and technical knowledge on skill and performance. Human Performance, 27, 311-327.

Krumm, S., Lievens, F., Huffmeier, J., Lipnevich, A. A., Bendels, H., & Hertel, G. (2015). How ‘situational’ is judgement in situational judgement tests? Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 399-416. doi: 10.1037/a0037674.

Leeds, J. P. (2012). The theory of cognitive acuity: Extending psychophysics to the measurement of situational judgement. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5, 166-181. doi: 10.1037/a0027294.

Lievens, F. (2006). International situational judgement tests. In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgement Tests: Theory, Measurement, and Application (pp. 279-300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lievens, F., Buyse, T., & Sackett, P. R. (2005). Retest effects in operational selection settings: Development and test of a framework. Personnel Psychology, 58, 981-1007. doi: 10.1111 /j .1744-6570.2005.00713.x.

Lievens, F., Buyse, T., Sackett, P. R., & Connelly, B. S. (2012). The effects of coaching on situational judgement tests in high-stakes selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 272-282. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00599.x.

Lievens, F., De Corte, W., & Westerveld, L. (2015). Understanding the building blocks of selection procedures: Effects of response fidelity on performance and validity. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1604-1627. doi: 10.1177/0149206312463941.

Lievens, F., & De Soete, B. (2012). Simulations. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection (pp. 383-410). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. (2011). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low- fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced- level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 927-940. doi: 10.1037/A0023496

Lievens, F., Peeters, H., & Schollaert, E. (2008). Situational judgement tests: A review of recent research. Personnel Review, 37, 426-441. doi: 10.1108/00483480810877598.

Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Situational judgement tests in high-stakes settings: Issues and strategies with generating alternate forms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1043-1055. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1043.

Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2012). The validity of interpersonal skills assessment via situational judgement tests for predicting academic success and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 460-468. doi: 10.1037/A0025741.

McDaniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzel, D. L., & Grubb, W. L. (2007). Situational judgement tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 63-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00065.x.

McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Finnegan, E. B., Campion, M. A., & Braverman, E. P. (2001). Use of situational judgement tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 730-740. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.730.

McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2001). Situational judgement tests: A review of practice and constructs assessed. International Journal ofSelection and Assessment, 9, 103-113. doi: 10.1111/ 1468-2389.00167.

McDaniel, M. A., Psotka, J., Legree, P. J., Yost, A. P., & Week, J. A. (2011). Toward an understanding of situational judgement item validity and group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 327-336. doi: 10.1037/a0021983.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system-theory ofpersonality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246.

Motowidlo, S. J., & Beier, M. E. (2010). Differentiating specific job knowledge from implicit trait policies in procedural knowledge measured by a situational judgement test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 321-333. doi: 10.1037/A0017975.

Motowidlo, S. J., Crook, A. E., Kell, H. J., & Naemi, B. (2009). Measuring procedural knowledge more simply with a single-response situational judgement test. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 281-288. doi: 10.1007/s10869-009-9106-4.

Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647. doi: 10.1037/ 0021-9010.75.6.640.

Motowidlo, S. J., Hooper, A. C., & Jackson, H. L. (2006a). Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioural effectiveness in situational judgement items. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 91, 749-761. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.749.

Motowidlo, S. J., Hooper, A. C., & Jackson, H. L. (2006b). A theoretical basis for situational judgement tests. In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgement Tests: Theory, Measurement, and Application (pp. 57-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Motowidlo, S. J., Martin, M. P., & Crook, A. E. (2013). Relations between personality, knowledge, and behaviour in professional service encounters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1851-1861. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12137.

Nguyen, N. T., Biderman, M. D., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Effects of response instructions on faking a situational judgement test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 250-260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00322.x.

Oostrom, J. K., Born, M. P., Serlie, A. W., & van der Molen, H. T. (2010). Webcam testing: Validation of an innovative open-ended multimedia test. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 532-550. doi: 10.1080/13594320903000005.

Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5, 343-355. doi: 10.1037//1082-989x.5.3.343.

Patterson, F., Ferguson, E., Norfolk, T., & Lane, P. (2005). A new selection system to recruit general practice registrars: Preliminary findings from a validation study. British Medical Journal, 330, 711-714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7493.711.

Peeters, H., & Lievens, F. (2005). Situational judgement tests and their predictiveness of college students’ success: The influence of faking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 70-89. doi: 10.1177/0013164404268672.

Potosky, D. (2008). A conceptual framework for the role of the administration medium in the personnel assessment process. Academy of Management Review, 33, 629-648. doi: 10.5465/ AMR.2008.32465704.

Richman-Hirsch, W. L., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 880-887. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.880.

Rockstuhl, T., Ang, S., Ng, K. Y., Lievens, F., & Van Dyne, L. (2015). Putting judging situations into situational judgement tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 464-480. doi: 10.1037/a0038098.

Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & Buster, M. A. (2013). Situational judgement tests: The influence and importance of applicant status and targeted constructs on estimates of Black-White subgroup differences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 394-409. doi: 10.1111/ Joop.12013.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262.

Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (2006). Situational judgement tests: Method or construct? In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgement Tests: Theory, Measurement, and Application (pp. 135-155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schmitt, N., & Ostroff, C. (1986). Operationalizing the behavioural consistency approach: Selection test development based on a content-oriented strategy. Personnel Psychology, 39, 91- 108. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00576.x.

Stemig, M., Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2015). Effects of organizationally-endorsed coaching on performance and validity of situational judgement tests. International Journal of Selection of Assessment, 23, 175-182.

Thornton, G. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Assessment Centres in Human Resource Management: Strategies for Prediction, Diagnosis, and Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Tacit Knowledge Inventory for Managers (TKIM). New York: Psychological Corporation.

Weekley, J. A., Hawkes, B., Guenole, N., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Low-fidelity simulations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour, 2, 295-322. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-orgpsych-032414-111304.

Weekley, J. A., & Jones, C. (1999). Further studies of situational tests. Personnel Psychology, 52, 679-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00176.x.

Weekley, J. A., Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2006). On the development of situational judgement tests: Issues in item development, scaling, and scoring. In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgement Tests: Theory, Measurement, and Application (pp. 157-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372-376. doi: 10.1037/H0026244.

Whetzel, D. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). Situational judgement tests: An overview of current research. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 188-202. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr. 2009.03.007.

Whetzel, D. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2008). Subgroup differences in situational judgement test performance: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 21, 291-309. doi: 10.1080/ 08959280802137820.

< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >