Aiken, J. R., Salmon, E. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2013). The origins and legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Journal ofBusiness and Psychology, 28(4), 383-399.
Arthur Jr., W., Doverspike, D., Barrett, G. V., & Miguel, R. (2013). Chasing the Title VII Holy Grail: The pitfalls of guaranteeing adverse impact elimination. Journal ofBusiness and Psychology, 28(4), 473-485.
Bellenger, B. L., & Yusko, K.P. (2015). Legal issues in employee selection: Negotiating the obstacles and avoiding the landmines. In R. R. Sims, W. J. Sauser, R. R. Sims & W. J. Sauser (Eds.), Legal and Regulatory Issues in Human Resources Management (pp. 117-135). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Biddle, D. A., & Nooren, P. M. (2006). Validity generalization vs. Title VII: Can employers successfully defend tests without conducting local validation studies? Labor Law Journal, 57, 216-237.
Bobko, P., & Roth, P. L. (2004). The four-fifths rule for assessing adverse impact: An arithmetic, intuitive, and logical analysis of the rule and implications for future research and practice. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 23, pp. 177-198). New York: Elsevier.
Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. City of Bridgeport, 933 F. 2d 1140 (1991).
Bryan, J. S. (1990). Shifting the burdens in disparate impact cases: Wards Cove Packing v. Atonio. Labor Lawyer, 6233-6249.
Campion, M. A., Outtz, J. L., Zedeck, S., Schmidt, F. L., Kehoe, J. F., Murphy, K. R., & Guion, R. M. (2001). The controversy over score banding in personnel selection: Answers to 10 key questions. Personnel Psychology, 54, 149-185.
Cascio, W. F., Outtz, J., Zedeck, S., & Goldstein, I. L. (1991). Statistical implications of six methods of test score use in personnel selection. Human Performance, 4(4), 233.
Chicago Firefighters v. City of Chicago, 249 F. 3d 649 (2001).
Cozma, I., & Woehr, D. (2008). International perspectives on the legal environment for selection: Romania case. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(2), 260-263.
D’Alessio, S., Stolzenberg, L., & Flexon, J. (2015). The effect of Hawaii’s ban the box law on repeat offending. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 336-352.
Drew, E. N., & Viswesvaran, C. (2013). Lost in translation: Disparate impact reduction strategies and legal stakeholders. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 6(4), 463-466.
Dunleavy, E. M., Cohen, D. B., Aamodt, M. G., & Schaeffer, P. (2008). A consideration of international differences in the legal context of selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(2), 247-254.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. (1978). Adoption by four agencies of Uniform Guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38290-38315.
Guion, R. M. (2011). Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions. Hove: Taylor & Francis.
Guion, R. M., & Highhouse, S. (2006). Essentials of Personnel Assessment and Selection. New York: Psychology Press.
Gutman, A. (2008). Legal environment for selection in the United States. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(2), 255-257.
Gutman, A., Koppes, L. L., & Vodanovich, S. J. (2011). EEO Law and Personnel Practices (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Hanges, P. J., & Feinberg, E. G. (2010). International perspectives on adverse impact: Europe and beyond. In J. L. Outtz (Ed.), Adverse Impact: Implications for Organizational Staffing and High Stakes Selection (pp. 349-373). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Hanges, P. J., Salmon, E. D., & Aiken, J. R. (2013). Legal issues in industrial testing and assessment. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA Handbook ofTesting and Assessment in Psychology, Vol. 1: Test Theory and Testing and Assessment in Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 693-711). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jeanneret, A. (2005). Professional and technical authorities and guidelines. In F. J. Landy (Ed.), Employment Discrimination Litigation: Behavioral, Quantitative, and Legal Perspectives (pp. 47-100). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Jeanneret, P. R., & Zedeck, S. (2010). Professional guidelines/standards. In J. L. Farr & N. T. Tippins, (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 593-625). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Johnson, J. W., Steel, P., Scherbaum, C. A., Hoffman, C. C., Jeanneret, P. R., & Foster, J. (2010). Validation is like motor oil: Synthetic is better. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 3(3), 305-328.
Jones, J. E. (1977). The development of modern equal employment opportunity and affirmative action law: A brief chronological overview. Harvard Law Journal, 20, 74-99.
King, E. B., Avery, D. R., & Sackett, P. (2013). Editorial: Three perspectives of employment discrimination 50 years after the Civil Rights Act - A promise fulfilled? Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(4), 375-382.
Laczko, F. (2002). New directions in migration policy in Europe. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 357(1420), 599-608.
Landy, F. J. (1986). Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. American Psychologist, 41, 1183-1192.
Landy, F. J. (2003). Validity generalization: Then and now. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Validity Generalization: A Critical Review (pp. 155-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Massachusetts Association of Minority Law Enforcement Officers v. Gerald T. Abban & others, 434 Mass. 256 (2001).
McDaniel, M., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 494-514.
Murphy, K. R., & Jacobs, R. R. (2012). Using effect size measures to reform the determination of adverse impact in equal employment litigation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(3), 477-499.
Myors, B., Mariani, M., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Van Hoye, G., Fraccaroli, F., & Bayazit, M. (2008a). Broadening international perspectives on the legal environment for personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(2), 266-270.
Myors, B., Fraccaroli, F., Lievens, F., Scholfert, E., Van Hoye, G., Sekiguchi, T., & Sackett, P. R. (2008b). International perspectives on the legal environment for selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(2), 206-246.
Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215-218.
Offermann, L. R., Basford, T. E., Graebner, R., Jaffer, S., De Graaf, S. B., & Kaminsky, S. E. (2014). See no evil: Color blindness and perceptions of subtle racial discrimination in the workplace. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 499-507.
Outtz, J. L. (2011). The unique origins of advancements in selection and personnel psychology. In S. Zedeck & S. Zedeck (Eds.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and Developing Members for the Organization (pp. 445-465). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pager, D., Western, B., & Sugie, N. (2009). Sequencing disadvantage: Barriers to employment facing young Black and White men with criminal records. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 195-213.
Praslova, L. (2008). The legal environment for selection in Russia. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(2), 264-265.
Ricci v. DeStefano, 129 S. Ct. 2658 (2009).
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & Switzer, F. S. (2006). Modeling the behavior of the 4/5ths rule for determining adverse impact: reasons for caution. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 507-522.
Rothenberg, J. Z., & Gardner, D. S. (2011). Protecting older workers: The failure of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 38, 9-30.
San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. San Francisco, 38 Cal. 4th 653 (2006).
Sackett, P. R., Shen, W., Myors, B., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Van Hoye, G., & Aguinis, H. (2010). Perspectives from twenty-two countries on the legal environment for selection. In J. L. Farr, & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 651-676). New York: Routledge/ Taylor & Francis Group.
Scherbaum, C. A. (2005). Synthetic validity: Past, present, and future. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 481-515.
Schmitt, N., & Sinha, R. (2011). Validation support for selection procedures. In S. Zedeck, & S. Zedeck (Eds.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and Developing Members for the Organization (pp. 399-420). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Thompson, J. L., & Morris, S. B. (2013). What factors influence judges’ rulings about the legality of affirmative action plans? Journal of Business & Psychology, 28(4), 411-424.