Desktop version

Home arrow Environment

  • Increase font
  • Decrease font


<<   CONTENTS   >>

Drought Resistance Traits in Terms of the Passioura Water Model

peanut populations, in which a selection index approach utilizing T, WUE, and HI is assessing the value of these traits in a large-scale breeding program in India and Australia.144!

Conclusion

Although drought is commonly referred to as “prolonged water deficit” periods during a crop’s life, it is indeed a complex syndrome with various climate pressures operating together in infinite combinations, resulting in significant reductions in crop performance. Historically, options for managing agricultural drought have revolved around management techniques such as deep tillage, mulching, intercropping, etc. However, future options for drought management will increasingly be based on the genetic improvement of crops for targeted environments. With genetic options, matching phenology to water availability in target environments has proven to be highly a successful approach. Although our understanding of drought resistance mechanisms has improved significantly, it is essential to distinguish the traits linked to short-term responses from those which are important when integrated over longer time scales.

References

  • 1. Schulze, E.D. Adaptation Mechanisms of Non-Cultivated Arid-Zone Plants: Useful Lessons for Agriculture. In Drought Research Priorities for the Dryland Tropics; Bidinger, F.R., Johansen, C., Eds.; ICIRSAT: Patancheru, A.P. 502324, India, 1988; 159-177.
  • 2. Passioura, J.B. Drought and Drought Tolerance. In Drought Tolerance in Higher Plants: Genetical, Physiological, and Molecular Biological Analysis; Belhassen, E., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: the Netherlands, 1996; 1-6.
  • 3. Unger, W.P.; Jones, O.R.; Steiner, J.L. Principles of Crop and Soil Management Procedures for Maximising Production per Unit Rainfall. In Drought Research Priorities for the Dry Land Tropics; Bidinger, F.R., Johansen, C., Eds.; ICIRSAT: Patancheru, A.P. 502324, India, 1988; 97-112.
  • 4. Natarajan, M.; Willey, R.W. The effects of water stress on yield advantages of intercropping systems. Field Crops Res. 1986,13,117-131.
  • 5. Nageswara Rao, R.C.; Wadia, K.D.R.; Williams, J.H. Intercropping of short and long duration groundnut genotypes to increase productivity in environments prone to end-of-season drought. Exp. Agric. 1990,26, 63-72.
  • 6. Richards, R.A. Defining Selection Criteria to Improve Yield Under Drought. In Drought Tolerance in Higher Plants: Genetical, Physiological, and Molecular Biological Analysis; Belhassen, E., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: the Netherlands, 1996; 71-78.
  • 7. Levitt, J. Response of Plants to Environmental Stresses; Academic Press: New York, 1972.
  • 8. Turner, N.C. Crop water deficits: A decade of progress. Adv. Agron. 1986,39,1-51.
  • 9. Turner, N.C.; Wright, G.C.; Siddique, K.H.M. Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water- limited environments. Adv. Agron. 2001, 71,193-231.
  • 10. Turner, N.C. Drought Resistance: A Comparison of Two Frameworks. In Management of Agricultural Drought: Agronomic and Genetic Options; Saxena, N.P., Johansen, C„ Chauhan, Y.S., Rao, R.C.N. Eds.; Oxford and IBH: New Delhi, 2000.
  • 11. Subbarao, G.V.; Johansen, C; Slinkard, A.E.; Rao, R.C.N.; Saxena, N.P.; Chauhan, Y.S. Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1995,14, 469-523.
  • 12. Jackson, P.; Robertson, M.; Cooper, M.; Hammer, G. The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding; From a breeding perspective. Field Crops Res. 1996, 49,11-37.
  • 13. Siddique, K.H.M.; Loss, S.P.; Regan, S.P.; Jettner, R. Adaptation of cool season grain legumes in Mediterranean type environments of south-western Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. 1999, 50, 375-387.
  • 14. Wright, G.C.; Smith, R.C.G.; Morgan, J.M. Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. III. Physiological responses. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. 1983,34, 637-651.
  • 15. Flower, D.J.; Ludlow, M.M. Contribution of osmotic adjustment to the dehydration tolerance of water-stressed pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) millsp.) leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 1986, 9,33-40.
  • 16. Davies, W.J.; Tardieu, F.; Trejo, C.L. How do chemical signals work in plants that grow in drying soil? Plant Physiol. 1994,104, 309-314.
  • 17. Morgan, J.M. Possible role of abscisic acid in reducing seed set in water-stressed wheat plants. Nature (bond.) 1980, 285, 655-657.
  • 18. Blum, A. Crop Responses to Drought and Interpretation of Adaptation. In Drought Tolerance in Higher Plants: Genetical, Physiological, and Molecular Biological Analysis; Belhassen, E., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: the Netherlands, 1996; 57-70.
  • 19. Morgan, J.M. Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1984, 35,299-319.
  • 20. Jones, M.M.; Rawson, H.M. Influence of the rate of development of leaf water deficits upon photosynthesis, leaf conductance, water use efficiency, and osmotic potential in sorghum. Physiol. Plant. 1979, 45,103-111.
  • 21. Morgan, J.M.; King, R.W. Association between loss of leaf turgor, abscisic acid levels and seed set in two wheat cultivars. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1984,11,143-150.
  • 22. Morgan, J.M.; Condon, A.G. Water use, grain yield and osmoregulation in wheat. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1986,13,523-532.
  • 23. Wright, G.C.; Smith, R.C.G. Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. II. Root water uptake and water use. Aust J. Agric. Resour. 1983,34, 627-636.
  • 24. Morgan, J.M. Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. 1983,34, 607-614.
  • 25. Blum, A.; Mayer, J.; Gozlan, G. Associations between plant production and some physiological components of drought resistance in wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 1983, 6,219-225.
  • 26. Santamaria, J.M.; Ludlow, M.M.; Fukai, S. Contributions of osmotic adjustment to grain yield in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under water-limited conditions. I. Water stress before anthesis. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. 1990, 41, 51-65.
  • 27. Morgan, J.M.; Rodriguez-Maribona, B.; Knights, E.J. Adaptation to water-deficit in chickpea breeding lines by osmoregulation: Relationship to grain-yields in the field. Field Crops Res. 1991, 27, 61-70.
  • 28. Blum, A. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1988.
  • 29. Sinclair, T.R.; Ludlow, M.M. Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1986,13, 329-341.
  • 30. Chandler, P.M.; Munns, R.; Robertson, M. Regulation of Dehydrin Expression. In Plant Responses to Cellular Dehydration During Environmental Stress; Close, T.J., Bray, E.A., Eds.; American Society of Plant Physiologists: Rockville, MD, 1993; 159-166.
  • 31. Close, T.J.; Fenton, R.D.; Yang, A.; Asghar, R.; DeMason, D.A.; Crone, D.E.; Meyer, N.C.; Moonan, F. Dehydrin: The Protein. In Plant Responses to Cellular Dehydration During Environmental Stress; Close, T.J., Bray, E.A., Eds.; Amer. Society of Plant Physiology, 1993; 104-118.
  • 32. Hanson, A.D.; Hitz, W.D. Metabolic responses of mesophytes to plant water deficits. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1982, 33,163-203.
  • 33. Mathews, R.B.; Harris, D.; Williams, J.H.; Nageswara Rao, R.C. The physiological basis for yield differences between four groundnut genotypes in response to drought. II. Solar radiation interception and leaf movement. Exp. Agric. 1988, 24, 203-213.
  • 34. Passioura, J.B. The Interaction between Physiology and the Breeding of Wheat. In Wheat Science- Today and Tomorrow; Evans, L.T., Peacock, W.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1981; 191-201.
  • 35. Passioura, J.B. Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 1977,43, 117-120.
  • 36. Farquhar, G.D.; Richards, R.A. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency in wheat genotypes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1984,11, 539-552.
  • 37. Nageswara Rao, R.C.; Wright, G.C. Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination across environments in peanuts. Crop Sci. 1994,34, 98-103.
  • 38. Masle, J.; Farquhar, G.D.; Wong, S.C. Transpiration ratio and plant mineral content are related among genotypes of a range of species. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1992,19, 709-721.
  • 39. Clark, D.H.; Johnson, D.A.; Kephart, K.D.; Jackson, N.A. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy estimation of 13C discrimination in forages. J. Range Manag. 1995,48,132-136.
  • 40. Subbarao, G.V.; Johansen, C.; Rao, R.C.N.; Wright, G.C. Transpiration Efficiency: Avenues for Genetic Improvement. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, 1994; 785-806.
  • 41. Wright, G.C.; Rachaputi, N.C. Transpiration Efficiency. In Water and Plants (Biology) for the Encyclopedia of Water Science; Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2003; 982-988.
  • 42. Fischer, K.S.; Johnson, E.C.; Edmeades, G.O. Breeding and Selection for Drought Resistance in Tropical Maize. In Drought Resistance in Crops with Emphasis on Rice; International Rice Research Institute: Los Banos, 1983; 377-399.
  • 43. Wright, G.C.; Rao, R.C.N.; Basu, M.S. A Physiological Approach to the Understanding of Genotype by Environment Interactions—A Case Study on Improvement of Drought Adaptation in Groundnut. In Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement; Cooper, M., Hammer, G.L., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, 1996; 365-381.
  • 44. Nigam, S.N.; Nageswara Rao, N.C.; Wright, G.C. In Breeding for Increased Water-Use Efficiency in Groundnut, New Millennium International Groundnut Workshop, Shandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao, China, Sept. 4-7,2001; 1-2.

26

 
<<   CONTENTS   >>

Related topics