Desktop version

Home Political science After Ethnic Conflict : Policy-making in Post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia

A short course of lectures
«After Ethnic Conflict: Policy-making in Post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia»

From Accommodation towards De-ethnicisation Macedonia 1991–2001: Towards Democracy and Sovereignty Minority Education Policy in Macedonia Case 1: Establishing State-level Ministry of Defence (2002–2003)Macedonia 1991–2001: Simmering Ethnic Tensions Media Sources De-ethnicisation of policies Historical Legacies in Decentralisation III What Makes Post-conflict Politics Work Implementation of adopted policies Approaches and Concepts: Institutions and Elites Before 2001 Decentralisation in Macedonia: Designing Municipal Maps and Funds Police in Post-conflict Security in Bosnia and Herzegovina Decentralisation Policy in Macedonia Yugoslav Communism (1974–1990)Unintended Effects from Education Reform Police Reform in Bosnia: Ethnicity above Efficiency On Ethnic Accommodation Historical Legacies in Minority Education Policy Book Structure Bibliography Explaining Success in Establishing State Military Capacity Case 2: Lajčak's Reform Proposal (2007–2008)External Actors IV Continuing Challenges: Persisting Ethnic tensions Beyond Formal Institutions Ohrid Framework Agreement – Bringing Power-sharing Back Defining Political Elites Official Documents and Reports:External Actors and Influences Institutional Framework: Post-conflict Institutions What Happens at the Policy Level?From Contestation towards Accommodation Bosnia 1991–1995: Break-up of Institutions Case 2: Compulsory Macedonian in Primary Schools Case 1: Tetovo University – Establishment and Legalisation Context: Post-conflict Ethnicity Policy Case Selection A Second Failure: Lajčak's Proposal Bosnia's Track Record after Dayton Security and Politics after Dayton Understanding Persisting Ethnic Resistance Interviews Military Reform in Bosnia: A Single Joint Army Effects of Federal Power-sharing The Post-conflict Political Arena Why Institutions Matter in Post-Conflict States Bosnia 1991–1996: From Communism to Ethnic Conflict Case 1: Ashdown Reform Proposal (2004–2005)Larger Perspectives Macedonia and Bosnia: Prospects and Challenges After 2001 Power-sharing Institutions in Yugoslavia Mapping the Field: Ethnicity, Violence, Institutions Drivers of Decentralisation Reform Critical Decisions: Pre-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina (1990–1995)Understanding Persistent Ethnicisation Articles, Chapters and Books Police Reform after the Conflict Actors: Political Elites Military Reform in Post-Dayton Bosnia Case 2: Increasing Funds for Municipalities (2005–2009)Government Crisis Dayton Bosnia – Institutions and Policy-making Informal practices Yugoslav Communism (1974–1990): Ethnicity and Ideology Explaining Ethnic Accommodation Case 1: Empowering Local Government 2002–2004 II Historical and Institutional Post-conflict Power-sharing: The Dayton Agreement Minority Education in Macedonia: Recurring Ethnic Tensions Political Elites and Ethnic Accommodation Unity, Continuity and Ethnic Identity After Ethnic Conflict: Why Look at Post-conflict Recovery?Why the Ashdown Proposal Failed Power-sharing mechanisms Macedonia's Track Record after 2001 Voting patterns Methodology of Research Data Collection and Availability Case 2: A Single Army (2004–2006)

Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter

Academic library - free online college e textbooks - info{at}ebrary.net - © 2014 - 2018