Desktop version

Home arrow History

  • Increase font
  • Decrease font


<<   CONTENTS   >>

Modelling of wellbeing criterion in the world-system of pandemic treatment and cure

The emergence of the objective criterion that we refer to as wellbeing function is a sequential consequence from the beginning to the continuity of Tawhidi ontological application as explained by Figure 3.2. We define the wellbeing criterion as the unique objective of organizing the generality, particularities, and details of the world-system in terms of diverse problems and ensuing variables in the light of the pervasively complementary organic relations between these entities by the Tawhidi ontological principle of unity of knowledge. In search of the organic inter-causal relations between the knowledge-induced variables a large system of imminent equations of the endogenous variables is evaluated, that is by estimation followed by simulation of the coefficients. The emergent policy analysis and recommendations with further new simulated formulations of the wellbeing function with its entirety of inter-variable equations then follow.

The way to dispense the Prophet’s medicine in its complementary form researched along with modem medicinal treatment as regular coronavirus pills is to take it regularly in daily intake with food. Besides this medicinal intake attributes like cleanliness and shared attributes of good behaviour, psychology, communitarian sociality, and faith are necessary ingredients of pandemic recovery. Other associated moral values are knowledge inculcation and human resource development towards communitarianism and participatory social contract for avoiding poverty, disease, and disorder. These practices ought to be carried out within the regular intake of the prophetic pills and guidance made and applied widely by extending their sources to the natural world of life-fulfilling plenty. Such prophetic guidance regarding protection from coronavirus can be assimilated with modem socio-scientific practices.14

Contrary examples to the complementary practices established wrongfully in sustainable adherence with wilful commitment are ignoring of civic duty to uphold norms of pandemic balanced lockdown, balanced industrial work habits, and orderliness of social distancing and face masks, wearing of proper and clean protective attire, eating of healthy food and diet, collectively establishing the social contract of participatory development of life-fulfillment economic activities, and importantly human empathy in the global and communitarian sense. It is also required to take such like adoptions in the consciousness of attributes of knowledge, and moral, social, and healthful choices with collaborative civic moral spirit. J. Graham (Mar. 21, 2020,10:00 p.m. MDT)15 writes, “The coronavirus crisis is a moral test. Will we pass? The challenges facing Americans are revealing our individual and national character.” Indeed, society and the global whole are communities that leam by the evolutionary leanring minuscule of self and family through the attribute properties of interaction, integration, sustained learning, and recursive practices of extensive complementarities (Vanek, 1971).16

Construction of quantitative form of wellbeing function from primal attributes to knowledge-induced empiricism: example from coronavirus episode

The derivation of knowledge from the Tawhidi ontological origin of unity of knowledge and signified by positive inter-variable complementarities is derived as an empirical objective criterion in respect of the wellbeing function. The cure of the coronavirus incidence by diversity of treatments on the inter-variable endogenous relations by way of complementarities is thereby established by empirical evaluation. First, evaluation comprises estimation of the large-scale system of equations in respect of their coefficients to bring out the degree of complementarities found between the variables. Second, estimation is then repeated by simulation of the coefficients under different conditions of inter-variable complementarities. Such evaluated complementarities signified by positive transformation of coefficients imply the degree of cure of the mutative state of coronavirus into normalcy state by inter-variable complementarities between the treatments.

The quantitative model of the wellbeing function is now formulated as follows:

Continuous interaction, integration, and evolutionary learning in knowledge, space, and time dimensions of continuum

Figure 3.3 Continuous interaction, integration, and evolutionary learning in knowledge, space, and time dimensions of continuum

The wellbeing objective criterion function is now formulated as follows:

with, Z(0(e)) as the vector of relative variables between {xj, h = 1,2,..nj health-related normalcy variables, and {ym}, m = 1,2,..% mutation related variables. Thus, the vector of relatives, {x1/xin}[(6(e))] denote the comparative dynamics towards attaining normalcy while reducing the incidence of mutation, as {0(e)} | with {s}}. monotonically. Thereby the dynamics of consciousness are upheld. These include cleanliness; structural economic change to balance off coronavirus lockdown with resulting economic activity; conscious adoption of complementary' medicine between natural sourced medicine and laboratory-generated medicine; and upholding social participation by the principle of unity of knowiedge. These attributes are contrary to semblances of methodological individualism and tire like in multidisciplinary disaggregation.

Participatory modes of socio-scientifrc activity altogether interrelate within themselves and with {xn/ym}[(0(£)]t, with 0(e)| monotonically as with {e} t. The interrelating treatments vector is denoted by T(0(e)) = {tj(0(e))}, j = 1,2,..., r. The multidisciplinary nature of inter-variable and systemic endogenous interrelations is established by interaction, integration, and evolutionary learning as pointed out in Figvtres 3.1-3.3.

The target of the evaluation of the w'ellbeing function by transforming mutation of coronavirus into normalcy by unity of knowledge organizes the entire multidisciplinary system as a complementary unit in the following form:

The [(xij + r) + 1] number of equations of circular causation between the interrelating variables including the last one is the quantitative form of the wellbeing function in temis of the knowledge variable. That is, the wellbeing function exists in two forms. First, the W(.) expression is the theoretical form. This theoretical form conveys the meaning of the epistemological origin of the wellbeing function in temis of the properties of the primal Tawhidi ontology of unity of knowledge. Second, the evaluated form of the theoretical wellbeing function appears in the form of knowledge parameter as the endogenously related variable to all the evaluated Y(0(e))-variables by their circular causation relations. Thus, all variables and their equations and both fomis of the wellbeing function are commonly induced by (0(e)).

The non-linear wellbeing function in its two forms and the inter-variable circular causation relations are given by the following expressions:

Let (xm)[0(e)] denote variables of increasing incidence of normalcy shown by flattening curve (see Chapters 1 and 2). These thereby show deepening of unity of knowledge as representation of increasing normalcy.

Let (xmi)[0(e)] denote variables of decreasing incidence of mutation shown by the flattening curve. There is thereby a deepening of unity of knowledge as representation of dying of mutation and gaining on increasing normalcy.

Thus the complementary impact of all {xnl/xml}[0(e)]-ratio variables on wellbeing is ontologically derived by the precept of unity of knowledge into its practice in evaluating the effect of relative gains of treatment affecting normalcy relative to mutation. The underlying assumption here is that of evolutionary' learning affecting progressive but not optimal resolution of normalcy contra mutation. Yet this is the continued achievement of stability and sustainability of a collecting healthful society under the impact of the principle of unity of knowledge affecting paired unity across systems of complementarities in socio-scientific engagement for attaining wellbeing.

Next we consider the effectiveness and sustainability of treatments {tj(0(e))}, j = 1, 2, . . r in establishing inter-variable resolution of normalcy relative to mutation of coronavims states. Such effectiveness occurs progressively by complementarities along with the evolutionary learning impact of unity of knowledge.

The presence of the time-variable, {t(0(e))}, induced by evolutionary learning along the path of stability and sustainability, marks the degrees of stability in sustainability'. Thereby, the inter-causal path of effectiveness of the socio-scientific inter-variables and treatments is gained progressively along the vector trend of dynamic evolutionary learning path. Yet such is not an optimal path of the variables and their wellbeing objective criterion.

The economic, scientific, social, and moral representative variables exemplify the inter-variable mutuality by their complementarities in their absolute or relative forms. Thereby, sustainability of inter-variable relations by way of treatments over repeated applications to the wellbeing objective function appears by reproduction of unity of knowledge over time. The knowledge-induced wellbeing function conveying its patterns of impact on the multidisciplinary perspective of the new socio-scientific and reconstituted moral and behavioural social contract is the great lesson to learn from the science-economy-society model of moral inclusiveness concerning the problem of coronavirus episode as exemplar.

 
<<   CONTENTS   >>

Related topics