Note

1 Published as A. Bernardi (2017), A common ground in clinical discussion groups: Intersubjective resonance and implicit operational theories, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98(5), 1291-1309. An earlier version of this paper (Bernardi, 2016) was published as "Investigación conceptual en psicoanálisis: ¿Tenemos conceptos universales o términos multívocos? [Conceptual research in psychoanalysis: Do we have universal concepts or multivocal terms?]." Revista de Psicoanálisis de la Asociación Psicoanalítica Argentina, 73(2-3), 168-178.

References

Altmann de Litvan, M. (Ed.). (2014). Time for change: Tracking transformations in psychoanalysis—The Three-Level Model. London: Kamac.

Baranger, M., Baranger, W., & Mom, J. M. (1983). Process and non-process in analytic work. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64,1-15.

Bernardi, R. (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70 (Pt 2), 341-357.

Bernardi, R. (2001). The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis: The debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 851-873.

Bernardi, R. (2002). La necesidad de controversias en Psicoanálisis. Los debates sobre M. Klein y J. Lacan en el Río de la Plata. In Psicoanálisis. Focos y aperturas (pp. 44-73). Montevideo: Psicolibros.

Bernardi, R. (2014a). The assessment of changes: Diagnostic aspects. In M. Altmann de Litvan (Ed.), Time for change: Tracking transformations in psychoanalysis— The Three-Level Model (pp. 263-278). London: Kamac.

Bernardi, R. (2014b). The Three-Level Model (3-LM) for observing patient transformations. In M. Altmann de Litvan (Ed.), Time for change: Tracking transformations in psychoanalysis—The Three-Level Model (pp. 3-34). London: Karnac.

Bernardi, R. (2015). What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 731-754.

Bernardi, R. (2016). Investigación conceptual en psicoanálisis: ¿Tenemos conceptos universales o términos multívocos? [Conceptual research in psychoanalysis: Do we have universal concepts or multivocal terms?]. Revista de Psicoanálisis, 73, 165-178.

Bernardi, R., & de León de Bernardi, B. (2012). The concepts of Vinculo and dialectical spiral: A bridge between intra- and intersubjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 81,531-564.

Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London: Tavistock.

Bleger, J. (1969). Teoría y práctica en psicoanálisis. La praxis psicoanalítica [Theory and practice in psychoanalysis: Psychoanalytic practice]. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 11,287-303.

Bohleber, W., Fonagy, P., Jiménez, J. P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S., & Zysman, S. F. P. (2013). Towards a better use of psychoanalytic concepts: A model illustrated using the concept of enactment. International Journal of Psychanalysis, 94,501-530.

Bohleber, W., Jiménez, J. P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S., & Zysman, S. (2015). Unconscious phantasy and its conceptualizations: An attempt at conceptual integration. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 705-730.

Canestri, J. (Ed.). (2006). Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Canestri, J. (Ed.). (2012). Putting theory to work: How are theories actually used in practice? London: Karnac.

Clark, H. FL, & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Cooper, A. M. (2008). American psychoanalysis today: A plurality of orthodoxies. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 36, 235-253.

Cooper, S. H. (2015). Clinical theory at the border(s): Emerging and unintended crossings in the development of clinical theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96,273-292.

De Waal, F. (2013). The bonobo and the atheist: In search of humanism among the primates. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.

Edelson, M. (1988). Psychoanalysis: A theory in crisis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Faimberg, H. (1996). Listening to listening. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 667-677.

Ferro, A. (2009). Transformations in dreaming and characters in the psychoanalytic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90,209-230.

Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In Scientific explanation, space, and time (Vol. 3, pp. 28-97). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Filho, P. D. (2003). Recent theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and their epistemological importance. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84,1189-1202.

Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis. S.E. 12 (pp. 109-120) [Consejos al médico sobre el tratamiento psicoanalítico. Obras completas: Tomo 12 (pp. 107-119). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu].

Freud, S. (1918). From the history oían infantile neurosis. S.E. 17 (pp. 1-124).

Gabbard, G.O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 475-485.

Gabbard, G. O., & Ogden, T. H. (2009). On becoming a psychoanalyst. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90,311-327.

Gardiner, M. M. (Ed.). (1971). The Wolf-Man by the Wolf-Man. New York: Basic Books.

Green, A. (2005). The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 627-632.

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hernandez Romillo, S. (2014). Leticia: The emergence of questions about herself. In M. Altmann de Litvan (Ed.), Time for change: Tracking transformations in psychoanalysis—The Three-Level Model (pp. 35-50). London: Kamac.

Hoffman, I. Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to "scientific legitimacy": The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57,1043-1069.

Kernberg, O. F. (1993). Convergences and divergences in contemporary psychoanalytic technique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74,659-673.

King, P., & Steiner, R. (Eds). (1991). The Freud-Klein controversies 1941-1945 (Vol. 11). London and New York: Tavistock-Routledge.

Klein, M. (1932). The psycho-analysis of children. London: Hogarth [E/ psicoanálisis de niños. Buenos Aires: Hormé, 1964].

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits: A selection (Trans. Alan Sheridan). New York: Norton, 1977 [Écrits. Paris: Seuil],

Laudan, L. (1990). Demystifying underdetermination. In C. Wade Savage (Ed.), Scientific theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 14, pp. 267-297). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Leclaire, S. (1958). A propos de l'épisode psychotique que présenta "l'homme aux loups" [Concerning the psychotic episode presented by "the Wolfman"]. Psychanalyse, 4,108-135.

Nieto, M., Bernardi, R., Altmann, M., Bouza, G., Cárdenas, M., & de León, B. (1985). Investigando la experiencia analítica: una propuesta [Inquiring into the analytic experience: A proposal]. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 83,117-135.

OPD Task Force (Ed.). (2008). Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD-2): Manual of diagnosis and treatment planning. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Pichon-Rivière, E. (1998). El proceso grupal. Del psicoanálisis a la psicología social [The group process: From psychoanalysis to social psychology]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Reik, T. (1968). Theodor Reik speaks of his psychoanalytic technique. American Imago, 25,16-20.

Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64,35^45.

Stanford, K. (2013). Underdetermination of scientific theory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/ scientific-underdetermination/.

Tuckett, D. (2006). The search to define and describe how psychoanalysts work: Preliminary report on the project of the EPF Working Party on Comparative Clinical Methods. In Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory (pp. 167-200). West Sussex: Wiley.

Tuckett, D., Basile, R., Birksted-Breen, D., Bóhm, T., Denis, P., Ferro, A., Hinz, H., Jemstedt, A., Mariotti, P., & Schubert, J. (2008). Psychoanalysis comparable and incomparable: The evolution of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

Wallerstein, R. S. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69,5-21.

Wallerstein, R. S. (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71,3-20.

Wallerstein, R. S. (2005). Dialogue or illusion? How do we go from here? Response to André Green. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 633-638.

Widlocher, D. (2008). Les psychanalystes savent-ils débattre? Paris: Odile-Jacob.

Zimmer, R. (2014). Discussion of Cooper, S. H. (2015). Clinical theory at the border(s): Emerging and unintended crossings in the development of clinical theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96,273-292.

Chapter 2