1 Particularly in the period between 1991 and 2001 (9/11), there was an exaggerated sense of the role of civil society in bringing democratic change, e.g. in Eastern Europe and a shift away from focusing on state capacity. This changed somewhat post-9/11 when the international policy discourse became more concerned with state failure as a feature of allowing al Qaeda to operate in Afghanistan and Somalia.
Ackerman, J. (2004) ‘Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond “Exit” and "Voice”’, World Development, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 447-63.
Allport, G. W. [1979(1954)] The nature of prejudice, 25th ed, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
Ankersen, C. (ed) (2007) Civil-military cooperation in post-conflict operations, London, Routledge.
Baciu, C.-A. (2019) ‘From Guardians of the State to Guardians of Democracy? Institutional Change and Military Democratization in Insecure States’, in Ratuva, S., Compel, R. and Aguilar, S. (eds) Guns & roses: Comparative civil- military relations in the changing security environment, Singapore, Springer Singapore, pp. 365-89.
Bagayoko, N., Hutchful, E. and Luckham, R. (2016) ‘Hybrid Security Governance in Africa: Rethinking the Foundations of Security, Justice and Legitimate Public Authority’, Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-32.
Ball, N. (2005) ‘Strengthening Democratic Governance of the Security Sector in Conflict-Affected Countries’, Public Administration and Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25-38.
Barnes, C. (2006) Agents for change: Civil society roles in preventing war & building peace, Den Haag, European Centre for Conflict Prevention.
Bernauer, T. (2016) How relevant are input and output legitimacy in international environmental governance?, Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century Working Paper 94, Zurich, National Centre of Competence in Research.
Biswas, S. N. (2009) ‘NGO Accountability: Issues and Possibilities’, KIIT Journal of Management, vol. 6, no. 1-2, pp. 1-25.
Bleiker, C. and Krupanski, M. (2012) The rule of law and security sector reform: Conceptualising a complex relationship, SSR Papers, vol. 5, Geneva, Ubiquity Press.
Bdhmelt. T. (2010) 'The Effectiveness of Tracks of Diplomacy Strategies in Third- Party Interventions’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 167-78.
Borchert, H. and Thiele, R. (2012) ‘Vernetzte Sicherheit: Grundlagen, Zwischen- bilanz und Entwicklungspotenzial’, Zeitschrift fur Aufien- und Sicherheitspolitik, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-22.
Bremer, S. A. (1992) ‘Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 09-41.
Bruneau, T. C. (2011) Patriots for profit: Contractors and the military in U.S. national security, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
Bruneau, T. C. and Matei, F. C. (2008) ‘Towards a New Conceptualization of Democratization and Civil-Military Relations’, Democratization, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 909-29.
Bryden, A. and Hiinggi, H. (eds) (2004) Reform and reconstruction of the security sector, Munster, LIT.
Brzoska, M. (2003) Development donors and the concept of security sector reform, Geneva, Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
Brzoska, M. and Heinemann-Griider, A. (2004) ‘Security Sector Reform and Post-Conflict Reconstruction under International Auspices’, in Bryden, A. and Hiinggi, H. (eds) Reform and reconstruction of the security sector, Munster, LIT, pp. 121-41.
Capoccia, G. and Kelemen, R. D. (2007) 'The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism’, World Politics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 341-69.
Cawthra, G. (2003) ‘Security Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa’, in Cawthra, G. and Luckham, R. (eds) Governing insecurity: Democratic control of military and security establishments in transitional democracies, London, Zed, pp. 31-56.
Cawthra, G. and Luckham, R. (2003) ‘Democratic Control and the Security Sector: The Scope for Transformation and Its Limits’, in Cawthra, G. and Luckham, R. (eds) Governing insecurity: Democratic control of military and security establishments in transitional democracies, London, Zed, pp. 305-327. Chataway, C. J. (1998) ‘Track II Diplomacy: From a Track I Perspective’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 269-87.
Christensen, T. and Ltegreid, P. (2007) ‘The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform’, Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1059-66.
Council of the European Union (2013) Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council- The EU’s comprehensive approach to external conflicts and crises (17859/13), Brussels.
Dahl, R. A. (1994) ‘A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation’, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 23-34.
D’Estree, T. P. Fast, L. A., Weiss, J. N. and Jakobsen, M. S. (2001) 'Changing the Debate about “Success” in Conflict Resolution Efforts’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 101-13.
Diamond, L. and McDonald, J. W. (1996) Multi-track diplomacy: A systems approach to peace, 3rd ed., West Hartford, CT, Kumarian Press.
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147-60.
Doyle, M. W. (1986) ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1151-69.
Drent, M. (2011) ‘The EU’s Comprehensive Approach to Security: A Culture of Co-ordination?’, Studia Diplomatica, vol. LXIV, no. 2, pp. 3-18.
Duffield, M. (2001) Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security, London, Zed Books.
Edmunds, T. (2004) ‘Security Sector Reform: Concepts and Implementation’, in Fluri, P. and Hadzic, M. (eds) Sourcebook on security sector reform. Collection of papers, Belgrade, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, pp. 45-62.
Edmunds, T. (2008) ‘Security Sector Reform’, in Edmunds, T. (ed) Security sector reform in transforming societies, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Edmunds, T. (ed) (2007) Security sector reform in transforming societies, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Edwards, B. and Foley, M. W. (2001) Civil Society and Social Capital: A Primer. In: Edwards, B., Foley, M. W. & Diani, M. (eds.) Beyond Tocqueville: Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective, Hanover, NH, University Press of New England, pp. 1-14.
Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. (eds) (1995) Non-governmental organisations: Performance and accountability beyond the magic bullet, London, Earthscan.
Ehrhart, H.-G. (2011) ‘Zivil-militarisches Zusammenwirken und vernetzte Sich- erheit als Herausforderung deutscher Sicherheitspolitik: Der Fall Afghanistan’, Zeitschrift fur Aufien- und Sicherheitspolitik, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65-85.
European Commission, High Representative of the Union for the Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2016) Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council - Elements for an EU-wide strategic framework to support security sector reform (SWD(2016) 221 final / JOIN(2015) 17 final).
European Union (2016) EU Global Strategy [Online]. Retrieved from https://eeas. europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf (accessed 22 July 2020).
Evans, P. (1996) ‘Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy’, World Development, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1119-32.
Fluri, P. and Hadzic, M. (eds) (2004) Sourcebook on security sector reform: Collection of papers, Geneva, Belgrade, Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces; Centre for Civil-Military Relations.
Fox, J. A. (2015) ‘Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?’, World Development, vol. 72, pp. 346-61.
Galtung, J. (1967) Theories of peace. A synthetic approach to peace thinking, International Peace Research Institute [Online]. Retrieved from www.transcend.org/ files/Galtung_Book_unpub_Theories_of_Peace_-_A_Synthetic_Approach_to_ Peace_Thinking_1967.pdf.
Gareis, S. B. (2010) ‘Schlussiges Konzept oder Schlagwort? Zu Anspruch und Praxis “Vernetzter Sicherheit” in Afghanistan’, Sicherheit & Frieden, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 239-46.
Ghebali, V.-Y. and Lambert, A. (eds) (op. 2007) Democratic governance of the security sector beyond the OSCE area: Regional approaches in Africa and the Americas, Zurich, Berlin, LIT.
Goel, О. P. (2004) Strategic management and policy issues of NGOs, Delhi, Isha Books.
Goetz, A. M. and Jenkins, R. (2001) ‘Hybrid Forms of Accountability: Citizen Engagement in Institutions of Public-Sector Oversight in India’, Public Management Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 363-83.
Goodhand, J. (2013) ‘Contested Boundaries: NGOs and Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan’, Central Asian Survey, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 287-305.
Griinewald, F. and Geoffroy, V. d. (2002) ‘CIMIC et ONG, quelles relationes?’, Med Trop, vol. 62, pp. 459-62.
Haas, К. M. (1974) International conflict, Indianapolis, IN, Bobbs-Merrill.
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence, Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.
Jaberg, S. (2009) Vernetzte Sicherheit?: Phanomenologische Rekonstruktion und kritische Reflexion eines Zentralbegriffs im Weiflbuch 2006, Hamburg, Fuhrung- sakademied. Bundeswehr.
Jakobsen, P. V. (2000) ‘The Emerging Consensus on Grey Area Peace Operations Doctrine: Will It Last and Enhance Operational Effectiveness?’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 36-56.
Jenny, J. (2001) ‘Civil-Military Cooperation in Complex Emergencies: Finding Ways to Make It Work’, European Security, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 23-33.
Kant, I. (1987) Zum ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf von Immanuel Kant, 1795th ed., Stuttgart, Engelhorn.
Khan, H. (2012) ‘Counterinsurgency (COIN) Strategy and Protracted Insurgency in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA)’, TIGAH. A Journal of Peace and Development, vol. 2, pp. 102-23.
Kilcullen, D. (ed.) (2006) Three Pillars of Counterinsurgency. U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Initiative, Washington DC.
Kilcullen, D. (2010) Counterinsurgency, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.
Kreuder-Sonnen, C. and Zangl, B. (2014) 'Which Post-Westphalia? International Organizations between Constitutionalism and Authoritarianism’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 568-94.
Kurtenbach, S. (2010) ‘Why Is Liberal Peace-Building so Difficult? Some Lessons from Central America’, European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, no. 88, pp. 95-110.
Lederach, J. P. (1997) Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies, Washington, DC, United States Institute of Peace Press.
Lilly, D. (2002) Peacebuilding dimension of civil-military relations in complex emergencies, London, International Alert.
Linklater, A. (2016) ‘Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77-103.
Lipset, S. M. (1959) ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 69-105.
Luckham, R. and Kirk, T. (2013) ‘Understanding Security in the Vernacular in Hybrid Political Contexts: A Critical Survey’, Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 339-59.
Mac Ginty, R. (2011) International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2009) ‘A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change’, in Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds) Explaining institutional change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-37.
Mainwaring, S. (1989) Transitions to democracy and democratic consolidation: Theoretical and comparative issues, Kellogg Institute for International Studies, Working Paper 130.
Maoz, Z. and Abdolali, N. (1989) ‘Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 3-35.
Mapendere, J. (2000) Defining track one-and-a-half diplomacy: Its complementarity and the analysis of factors that facilitate its success, Ottawa, Royal Roads University.
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1984) ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 734-49.
Mathews, J. T. (1997) ‘Power Shift’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 50-66.
McNamara, M. W. (2008) Exploring interactions during multiorganizational policy implementation: A case study of the Virginia coastal zone management program. Dissertation, Norfolk, VA, Old Dominion University [Online], Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=- publicservice_etds (accessed 22 July 2020).
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994/1995) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 5-49.
Metcalfe, V., Haysom, S. and Gordon, S. (2012) Trends and challenges in humanitarian civil-military coordination: A review of the literature. Overseas Development Institute, HPG Working Paper.
Millar, G., van der Lijn, J. and Verkoren, W. (2013) ‘Peacebuilding Plans and Local Reconfigurations: Frictions between Imported Processes and Indigenous Practices’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 137-43.
Montville, J. V. (1991) ‘Track Two Diplomacy: The Arrow and the Olive Branch: A Case for Track Two Diplomacy’, in Volkan, V. D. (ed) Unofficial diplomacy at work, Lexington, MA, Lexington Books, pp. 161-75.
NATO (2018) A “comprehensive approach ” to crises [Online], Retrieved from https:// www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_51633.htm (accessed 22 July 2020).
O’Donnell, G. A. (1994) ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55-69.
Odugbemi, S. and Lee, T. (2011) Accountability through public opinion: From inertia to public action, Washington, DC, World Bank.
OECD (2000) Security-sector reform and development co-operation: A conceptual framework for enhancing policy coherence (DCD(2000)4).
OECD (2005/2008) The Paris declaration of aid effectiveness (2005) and Accra Agenda for action (2008).
OECD (2006) Whole of government approaches to fragile states, OECD/DAC, DAC Guidelines and Reference Series.
OECD (2008) ‘Whole-of-Government Approaches to Fragile States’, OECD Journal on Development, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 179-232.
OECD (2011) ‘The Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States’, in International engagement in fragile states: Can’t we do better?, Paris, OECD, pp. 47-9.
Paris, R., Newman, E. and Richmond, О. P. (2009) New perspectives on libera! peacebuilding, Tokyo, United Nations University Press.
Przeworski, A. (1991) Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Ray, J. L. (1993) Wars between democracies: Rare, or nonexistent? International Interactions, vol. 18, no. 3, 251-76.
Redmond, W. H. (2005) ‘Processes of Gradual Institutional Drift’, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 501-9.
Riches, L. (2017) ‘Legal and normative pluralism, hybridity and human rights: The Universal Periodic Review’, in Freedman, R. and Lemay-Hebert, N. (eds) Hybridity: Law, culture and development, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge, pp. 161-81.
Richmond, О. P. (2014) Failed statebuilding: Intervention, the state, and the dynamics of peace formation, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
Richmond, О. P. (2016) Peace formation and political order in conflict affected societies, New York, Oxford University Press.
Rummel, R. J. (2016) ‘Democracies Are Less Warlike Than other Regimes’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 457-79.
Rustow, D. A. (1970) ‘Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model’, Comparative Politics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 337-63.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research, New York, Westview Press.
Schirch, L. (2010) The civil society-military relationship in Afghanistan, Washington, DC, United States Institute of Peace.
Schmid, M. (2007) The concept of comprehensive security: A distinctive feature of a shared security culture in Europe, [United States], Monterey, CA, Naval Postgraduate School.
Schnabel, A. and Born, H. (2011) Security sector reform: Narrowing the gap between theory and practice, Geneva, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1955) Social classes: Imperialism, New York, Noonday Press.
Serra, N. (2010) The military transition: Democratic reform of the armed forces, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Shankland, A. (2006) Making space for citizens. Broadening the 'new democratic spaces' for citizen participation, Institute of Development Studies, IDS Policy Briefing 27.
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004) ‘Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks’, Government and Opposition, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 159-90.
Stedman, S. J. and Rothchild, D. (1996) ‘Peace Operations: From Short-Term to Long-Term Commitment’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 17-35.
Sternberg, C. S. (2015) ‘Political Legitimacy between Democracy and Effectiveness: Trade-offs, Interdependencies, and Discursive Constructions by the EU Institutions’, European Political Science Review, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 615-38.
United Nations (2008) Securing peace and development: The role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform (A/62/659).
United Nations (2012) The United Nations SSR Perspective [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/events/peacekeepersday/pdf/securityreform.pdf (accessed 22 July 2020).
United Nations (2014) The maintenance of international peace and security: Security sector reform: Challenges and opportunities (S/RES/2151).
US Agency for International Development, Department of Defense and US Department of State (2009) Security sector reform [Online], Retrieved from https://2009-2017. state.gov/documents/organization/115810.pdf (accessed 22 July 2020).
US Department of Defense (2010) Quadrennial Defense Review Report [Online], Retrieved from https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/quadrennial/ QDR2010.pdf?ver=vVJYRVwNdnGb_00ixF0UfQ%3d%3d (accessed 22 July 2020).
van Veen, E. and van den Boogaard, A. (2016) ‘De politieke dynamiek van veiligheid in Burundi: Inzichten en uitdagingen’, Militaire spectator: tijdschrift voorhet Ned- erlandsche leger, vol. 185, no. 7/8, pp. 306-19.
Visoka, G. (2015) ‘Peace/Knowledge: The Promise of New Epistemologies of Peace’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 542-50.
Visoka, G. (2017) 'After Hybridity?’, in Freedman, R. and Lemay-Hebert, N. (eds) Hybridity: Law, culture and development. Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge, pp. 301-24.
Wittkowsky, A. (2012) Vernetzte Sicherheit: Begriff, Einordnung und Umsetzung in der Konfliktbearbeitung, Zentrum fur Internationale Friedensansiitze, Thesen- papier zur Anhorung des Unterausschusses.
Wood, G. (1996) ‘The South African Military in Transition’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 387-400.
Wucherpfennig, J. and Deutsch, F. (2009) ‘Modernization and Democracy: Theories and Evidence Revisited’, Zurich, Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich.
Yalfinkaya, H. (2012) ‘The Nongovernmental Organizations-Military Security Collaboration Mechanism’, Armed Forces & Society, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 489-510.
Ziirn, M. (2000) ‘Democratic Governance beyond the Nation-State’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 183-221.