Desktop version
Home
Law
>>
Dialogues on Italian Constitutional Justice: A Comparative Perspective
: Relationality as the hallmark of the Italian Style of constitutional adjudication
: Relationality revisited
: Relationality vs. weakness: perception and reality
Relationality "unpacked"
: Official vs. Unofficial relationality
: Dialogue as a method
: Relationality and constitutional pluralism
Dialogue I: Constitutional Courts and Legal Scholarship
: Je T’aime … Moi Non Plus: Some Considerations on (and Impressions of) the Relationships between Constitutional Justice and Legal Scholarship
: The difficulties encountered during research
: The semi-direct sources
: The indirect sources
: Implied sources
: Reasons (and prospects) for the absence of direct sources
: An impression, not a conclusion
: The Wasp and the Orchid: Constitutional Justice and Legal Scholarship Need Each Other
: The influence of legal scholarship on constitutional justice
: Semi-direct sources
: Indirect sources
: Implied sources
: The perception of constitutional justice by legal scholarship
: The perception of the constitutional court itself
: The perception of constitutional case law
: The destinies of constitutional justice and legal scholarship are more intertwined than ever before
Dialogue II: Open and Closed Forms of Constitutional Adjudication
: Openness and Transparency in Constitutional Adjudication: Amici Curiae, Third-Party Intervention, and Fact-Finding Powers
: The legislative and autonomous framework
: Third-parties and amici curiae: case-law and scholarly debate
: The established case-law on third-party interventions
: The scholarly debate on amici curiae briefs
: Case law and scholarly debate on fact-finding
: Conclusion
Post Scriptum: "The Court Opens to Hearing the Voice of Civil Society"
: Procedural Rules and the Cultivation of Well-Informed and Responsive Constitutional Judiciaries
: Benefits, risks and challenges of ‘open’ constitutional adjudication
: Designing for participation-friendly constitutional litigation and well-rounded judicial deliberations
: Of hermeneutics and legal formants
: Concluding thoughts
Dialogue III: The Principle of Collegiality
: Collegiality Over Personality: The Rejection of Separate Opinions in Italy
: The meaning of the collegiality principle and its repercussions on separate opinions
The Constitutional Court’s position: preservation of the status quo
: Pros and cons: the debate among scholars
: Conclusion
: “Collegiality” in Comparative Context
: A spectrum of collegiality
: Dialogue and legal development
: Institutional legitimacy
: Conclusion
Dialogue IV: Access to Constitutional Adjudication
: Direct Constitutional Complaint and Italian Style do not Match. Why Is That?
: The fairy tale of the Constitutional Court in the Italian Constituent Assembly: Aesop’s sheep or Cinderella?
: Constitutional Court and the judiciary: it takes two to tango
: The direct complaint according to the Constitutional Court: a superfluous instrument?
: The direct complaint within constitutional literature. A rarefied yet not a sterile debate
: The Potential Virtues and Risks of Abstract Constitutional Challenges and Individual Complaints: Some Reflections From Spain
: Constitutional challenges: a powerful weapon
: Constitutional challenges: problems with time
: Constitutional challenges and the risk of politicization
: Constitutional complaints to safeguard fundamental rights
: Conclusion
Dialogue V: Judicial Reasoning and Interpretation
: Forms and Methods of Constitutional Interpretation – Italian Style
: Constitutional interpretation in contemporary Italian legal culture
: The nature of constitutional norms
: Constitutional norms vs. constitutional programs
: Constitutional rules, principles, and values
: Constitutional interpretation and conceptions of the constitution
: The defensive constitution
: The foundational constitution
The principle-based model
: The values-based model
: Taking stock
: The Relationship between Forms and Methods in Constitutional Interpretation: Comparative Reflections
: Constitutional norms and interpretive choice
: Choosing among interpretive choices
: Conclusion
Dialogue VI: National Constitutional Adjudication in a Transnational Context
: The Italian Constitutional Court in the European Space: An Empirical Approach
: A story of opening up
: The quantitative experiment: process and caveats
: A year in numbers
The demand side for européanisation
: Judicial encounters with European legal orders
: European relationality at work
: Pride and boundary-marking
: Respect and sensibility
: Persuasion and resistance
: A qualitative test for dialogue
: Conclusion
: European Relationality in the European Legal Space: Country-Specific Mixtures within One European Style
: Relationality in the European legal space: an Italian feature, or a European device?
: The Belgian Constitutional Court’s approach towards the European courts in 2016
: The demand side for europeanisation
: Judicial encounters with European legal orders
: European relationality at work in 2016
: The Belgian Constitutional Court’s approach towards the European courts in the long-term
: Respect
: Pride
: Resistance
: Conclusion
: Power Is Perfected in Weakness: On the Authority of the Italian Constitutional Court
The idea of "strength in weakness"
: Limited access
: Low profile
: Adverse environment
Playing poker
>>
Related topics
Academic library - free online college e textbooks - info{at}ebrary.net - © 2014 - 2023