1. There has been critique over the use of the term maker as an emasculating term that privileges white, male, able-bodied creators versus their counterparts. Art professor Diane Willow at the University of Minnesota has shared with me a story wherein a female colleague who invented the technology for the LilyPad e-textile circuit board was only ever noted as a “crafter” in mainstream reports rather than a “maker” due to her identification as female. For the purpose of clarity and consistency, I use “maker” as an androgynous term to represent all creators who embody the spirit of the Maker Movement.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). Learning through doing: An introduction to design thinking. Retrieved from www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default- source/default-document-library/aitsl-learning-through-doing-introducdon-to- design-thinking.pdf?sfvrsn=e0bdec3c_0
Barrett, T, Pizzico, M., Levy, B., & Nagel, R. (2015). A review of university maker spaces. In Proceedings of 122nd ASEE annual conference and exposition (pp. 1—17). Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Bay, J., Johnson-Sheehan, R., & Cook, D. (2018). Design thinking via experiential learning: Thinking like an entrepreneur in technical communication courses. Programmatic Perspectives, /0(1), 172-200.
Breaux, C. (2017). Why making? Computers and Composition, 44, 27-35.
Brown, J., & Rivers, N. (2013). Composing the carpenter’s workshop. О-Zone: A Journal of Object-Oriented Studies, /(1), 27-36.
Cargile Cook, K. (2002). Layered literacies: A theoretical frame for technical communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(1), 5-29.
Cavalcanti, G. (2013). Is it a hackerspace, makerspace, techshop, or fablab? Make:. Retrieved front https://makezine.com/2013/05/22/the-difference-between-hackerspaces- makerspaces-techshops-and-fablabs/
Craig, J. (2014). Makers and makerspaces: Teaching composition in a creative economy. Retrieved from http://unwrite.org/pearson/
Cuntming, E., & Kaplan, W (1991). The arts and crafts movement. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson.
Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalisation, 7(3), 11-18.
Educause. (2013). Seven things you need to know about makerspaces. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7095.pdf
Elam-Handloff, J. (2016). Making across the curriculum: DIY culture, makerspaces, and new modes of composition. Gayle Morris Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative (DRC). Retrieved from www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org/2016/03/03/making- across-the-curriculum-diy-culture-makerspaces-and-new-modes-of-composition/
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
|cncks, C., & Silver, N. (2013). Adhocism: The case for improvisation. Expanded and updated edition. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology Press.
Make: magazine, (n.d.). Maker media. Retrieved from http://makezine.com
Maker Faire: A bit of history, (n.d.). Retrieved from https://makerfaire.com/ makerfairehistory/
Maxigas, P. (2012). Hacklabs and hackerspace-tracing two genealogies. Journal of Peer Production, 2, 1-10.
Morozov, E. (2014, January 13). Making it: Pick up a spot welder and join the revolution. The New Yorker. Retrieved from www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/01/13/ making-it-2
Prior, P., & Shipka, J. (2003). Chronotopic laminations: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing societies (pp. ISO- 238). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://wac. colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/prior/
Rose, M. (2014). The maker movement: Tinkering with the idea that college is for everyone. Truthdig. Retrieved from www.truthdig.com/articles/the-maker-movement- tinkering-with-the-idea-that-college-is-for-everyone/
Roy, D. (2016). Task-based technical communication with 3D-printing-based initiatives in a foreign language teaching context. Paper presented at the Annual Technical Communication Symposium, Kyoto, Japan.
Sayers, J. (Ed.). (2017). Making things and drawing boundaries: Experiments in the digital humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sheridan, D. (2010). Fabricating consent: Three-dimensional objects as rhetorical compositions. Computers and Composition, 27(4), 249-265.
Shipka, J. (2011). Toward a composition made whole. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Stockman, A. (2016). Make writing: 5 Teaching strategies that turn writer’s workshop into a maker space. Cleveland, OH: Times 10 Publications.
Tham, J. (2020). Engaging design thinking and making in technical and professional communication pedagogy'. Technical Communication Quarterly. Published online first. Retrieved from www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10572252.2020.1804619
Trimbur, J. (2000). Composition and the circulation of writing. College Composition and Communication, 52(2), 188-219.
What is a makerspace? (2015). Retrieved from http://pages.vassar.edu/makerspacetalk/ 2015/10/21/ what-is-a-makerspace-2/
Yancey, К. B. (2004). Looking for sources of coherence in a fragmented world: Notes toward a new assessment design. Computers and Composition, 21(1), 89-102.