Home Language & Literature
|
|
|||||
SummaryTable of Contents:
This chapter has explored the representations and understanding of the beauty/grooming market for men through a discussion of male lifestyle magazines and (group) interviews with several male participants. As has been discussed in the literature, beauty brands are struggling to find the right tone to address men because they must navigate the feminine connotations of the market. One way to do this is to emphasise masculine values and interests; in the Gay Times and FHM data, for example, brands have drawn on discourses of sports and - for a heterosexual male audience - concepts of violence and fighting. Moreover, a ‘no-nonsense’ approach, which comprises a focus on price and practicality of a product or service, was widely adopted in the adverts aimed at men. This functional approach to grooming and buying products was also highlighted in the (group) interviews. The features related to grooming published in the men’s magazines showed an evident understanding of and a (somewhat) sceptical attitude towards the beauty market, which was echoed across the (group) interviews. However, despite this scepticism, the magazines - particularly those aimed at gay men - appeared aware of the insecurities men may experience in relation to their bodies and masculine identities. Enabling a discussion of these insecurities, both the magazines and the interview participants employed humour. Moreover, as interviewees did not want to appear too invested in the grooming market, they used various distancing strategies, such as the ‘littling’ of products and product use. Lastly, although previous literature has suggested a difference between the marketing and use of grooming products and services amongst hetero- and gay men, only some evidence for this claim was found here. Importantly, the male participants of the (group) interviews remarked that FHM and the Gay Times actually looked very similar and included comparable advertising. Notes
ReferencesAdams, J. (2009). Bodies of change: A comparative analysis of media representations of body modification practices. Sociological Perspectives 52.1: 103-129. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2009.52-l.103 Atkinson, M. (2008). Exploring male femininity in the ‘crisis’: Men and cosmetic surgery. Body & Society 14.1: 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1357034X07087531 Barber, K. (2016). Styling masculinity: Gender, class, and inequality in the men’s grooming industry. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Belch, G. E., 6c Belch, M. A. (2015). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education. Benwell, B., 6c Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Berkowitz, D. (2017). Botox nation: Changing the face of America. New York: New York University Press. Browne, A. L. (2016). Can people talk together about their practices? Focus groups, humour and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life. Area 48.2: 198— 205. https://doi.org/10-l 111/area.12250 Chappie, A., 6c Ziebland, S. (2004). The role of humor for men with testicular cancer. Qualitative Health Research 14.8: 1123-1139. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1049732304267455 Coupland, J. (2007). Gendered discourse on the ‘problem’ of ageing: Consumerized solutions. Discourse & Communication 1.1: 37-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1750481307071984 Cunningham, J., 6c Roberts, P. (2012). Inside her pretty little head. London: Marshall Cavendish Business. Edwards, T. (1997). Men in the mirror: Men’s fashion, masculinity, and consumer society. London: Cassell. Eisend, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of gender roles in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38: 418-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/ si 1747-009-0181-x Elliott, R., 6C Elliott, C. (2005). Idealized images of the male body in advertising: A reader- response exploration. Journal of Marketing Communications 11.1: 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1352726042000263566 Griffiths, J. (Ed.). (2006). Men’s toiletries and fragrances (4th ed.) Key Note Market Assessment. Herman, E.S., 6c Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books. Holliday, R., 6c Cairnie, A. (2007). Man made plastic: Investigating men’s consumption of aesthetic surgery. Journal of Consumer Culture 7.1: 57-78. https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1177/1469540507073508 Jankowski, G. S., Fawkner, H., Slater, A., &Tiggemann, M. (2014). ‘Appearance potent’? A content analysis of UK gay and straight men’s magazines. Body Image 11.4: 474-481. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.010 Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Lanzieri, N., & Cook, B. J. (2013). Examination of muscularity and body fat depictions in magazines that target heterosexual and gay men. Body Image 10.2: 251-254. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.12.003 Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to multimodal analysis. London: Bloomsbury. Mackinnon, K. (2003). Representing men: Maleness and masculinity in the media. London: Hodder Education. Robinson, J. (2009). Laughter and forgetting: Using focus groups to discuss smoking and motherhood in low-income areas in the UK. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 22.3: 263-278. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09518390902835421 Tambe, R. (Ed.) (2003). Men’s toiletries and fragrances (2nd ed.) Key Note Market Assessment. Taylor, S. (Ed.) (2005). Men’s toiletries and fragrances (3rd ed.) Key Note Market Assessment. WARC Exclusive. (2010). WARC briefing: Men. WARC (2015). Passport Beiersdorf AG in beauty and personal care (world). |
<< | CONTENTS | >> |
---|