Bioremediation methods of heavy metal contaminated soils
It is estimated that nearly 20 million hectares of soils are contaminated with different heavy metals, both originating from natural sources as well as anthropogenic activities (Liu et al. 2018). Many approaches are employed to reduce heavy metal pollution in soils which include physical, chemical, biological techniques and integrated approaches. Physical approaches of remediation rely mainly on removal of contaminated soil, applying electro-kinetic approaches, and verification while chemical methods include soil washing, immobilization and encapsulation; in biological methods, different organisms (plants and microbes) are used to extract, stabilize, volatilize and remove heavy metals from polluted soils (Klialid et al. 2017). In integrated methods, physical, chemical, or biological approaches are implied in combination. Particularly employed teclmiques in the remediation processes have their own merits and demerits. Liu et al. (2018) advocated in situ and landfilling approaches as more effective than the other methods. Araliah et al. (2019) asseited that an integrated approach using chemical and biological techniques is more effective and environmentally sound. A combination of nanotechnology with the use of microorganisms is also considered as a promising method to reclaim contaminated soils (Cao et al. 2019). In many recent reviews, employment of bioremediation techniques has been favored for reclamation of heavy metal contaminated soils because of their cost-effectiveness, feasibility and eco-friendliness (Ashraf et al. 2019, Fu et al. 2019, Yang et al. 2019, Muthusaravanan et al. 2020).
Table 1. Heavy metals and their consequences on germination, growth, physiological, metabolical and yield attributes of
different plants.
Plants under heavy metal stress
|
Heavy
metals
|
Nature of heavy metals
|
Effects on plants
|
References
|
Phaseohis vulgaris
|
As
|
Non-essential,
toxic
|
At concentration 5 mg dm"5, As stress significantly reduced growth, physicochemical activities and protein contents
|
Stoeva et al. (2005)
|
Hordeum vulgare
|
Ni
|
Essential
|
100 pM concentration of Ni caused necrosis, chlorosis and reduced growth and mineral distribution
|
Rahman et al. (2005)
|
Sesbania drummondii
|
Pb
|
Non-essential,
toxic
|
Poor seedling growth, photosynthesis and anti-oxidative responses
|
Israr et al. (2006)
|
Brassica pekinensis
|
Cu
|
Essential
|
At higher concentration, growth and nitrogen metabolism reduced
|
Xiong et al. (2006)
|
Hordeum vulgare
|
Cu, Al, Cd
|
Essential and non-essential
|
Poor growth and metabolic activities at higher concentrations
|
Guo et al. (2007)
|
Elsholtzia atg)n
|
Pb
|
Non-essential,
toxic
|
Photosynthesis, leaf growth and membranes’ abnormalities at 200 pM
|
Islam et al. (2008)
|
Leucaena
leucocephala
|
Cd, Pb
|
Non-essential
|
75 ppm concentration of Pb while 50 ppm of Cd reduced seedlmg root and shoot growth and dry weight
|
Shafiq et al. (200S)
|
Vetiveria zizanioides
|
Cd
|
Non-essential,
toxic
|
Protem, chlorophyll contents, reduced water uptake and poor root activity
|
Aibibu et al. (2010)
|
pakchoi and mustard
|
Cd
|
Non-essential
|
Reduced growth and photosynthesis, shoot and root w'eight decreased
|
Chen et al. (2011)
|
Liman usitatissimum
|
Cd, Cr
|
Non-essential
|
Decreased photosynthesis and plant growth attributes
|
All et al, (2015)
|
Eichhornia crassipes
|
Pb
|
Non-essential
|
Plant growth and chlorophyll content drastically decreased
|
Malar et al. (2016)
|
Entca sativa
|
Cu, Ni, Zn, Hg, Cr, Pb
|
Essential/non-
essential
|
Decreased germination and seedling growth
|
Zhiet al. (2015)
|
Brassica juncea
|
Cr, Cd, Pb, Hg
|
Non-essential
|
Increased level of heavy metals decreased photosynthesis, biomass and chlorophyll content
|
Sheetal et al. (2016)
|
Zea mays
|
Ni
|
Essential
|
At higher concentrations, Ni stress induced low mineral contents, photosynthesis, growth and biomass
|
Rehman et al. (2016)
|
Pisum sativum
|
Co, Pb, Cd
|
Essential/
Non-essential
|
Abnormal growth and biomass at concentration 750-1250 ppm
|
Majeed et al. (2019)
|
Spinacia oleracea
|
As, Hg
|
Non-essential
|
Abnormal and reduced plant growth, and metal distribution
|
Zubair et al. (2019)
|
Triticum aestivum
|
Zn, Cu
|
Essential
|
Germination parameters and seedlmg growth attributes responded negatively to higher concentration of metals
|
Wang et al. (2019)
|
T. aestivum
|
Cu, Pb
|
Essential non- essential
|
Reduced plant growth and enzymatic activities
|
Jiang et al. (2019)
|
Desmodesmus sp.
|
Cu
|
Essential
|
Negative effect on growth and filament structure
|
Buayam et al. (2019)
|
Zea mays
|
Cu
|
Essential
|
At higher concentrations, plant height and weight reduced u'hile mineral uptake w'as disturbed
|
Reckova et al. (2019)
|
Table 1 Contd. ...
Heay Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils: Consequences and Bioremediation Approaches 231
...Table 1 Contd.
Plants under heavy metal stress
|
Heavy
metals
|
Nature of heavy metals
|
Effects on plants
|
References
|
Petunia hybrid
|
Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb
|
Essential/non-
essential
|
Morphological and biochemical abnormalities
|
Khan et al. (2019)
|
Uvginea maritime
|
Al. Cr, Cd, Pb
|
Essential/non-
essential
|
Decline in photosynthesis and chlorophyll pigments
|
Houri et al. (2020)
|
Nicotiana alata
|
Cd, Cr, Co, Ni, Pb
|
Essential/non-
essential
|
Stress imposition, negative effects on physiology' and photosynthesis
|
Khan et al. (2020)
|
Bioreinediation in wider terms implies the use of living organisms for minimizing the concentration and adverse effects of heavy metals in contaminated soils. Generally, plants (herbs, shrubs, trees and even algae) are used as remediating agents in most of the polluted sites and the technique is referred to as “phytoremediation”. Microorganisms such as bacteria and some fungi may also be used in remediation processes and this approach is termed as “microbial remediation”. Phytoremediation coupled with the microbial application (bacteria, microfungi, and microalgae) is termed as “microbial assisted phytoremediation” (Dotaniya et al. 2018). Plants used wither alone or in combination with microbes, and employ different strategies such as chelation, accumulation, extraction, volatilization and stabilization of heavy metals (Figure 1).
Figure 1. An illustration of the heavy metal input mto soils and bioremediation strategies employed by plants and microbes.
|