Desktop version

Home arrow Sociology arrow Understanding Society and Natural Resources

Conclusion

This chapter has argued for the utility of Social Network Analysis for the inter-disciplinary investigation of climate change as a social issue and problem. SNA can integrate the effects of ideas from the social and natural sciences and the humanities upon the fields of discourse and action around climate change. Examining the structure and flow of different kinds of social networks around climate change reveals patterns of understanding and action that shape the social response to climate change and other problems. Examining both discourse networks and advocacy coalitions, the chapter has developed an initial comparison of differences in how three societies, Japan, New Zealand, and the United States, have been framing and responding to climate change, The chapter, drawing upon early results from the project Comparing Climate Change Policy Networks (Compon), illustrates the great potential of the network approach for the inter-disciplinary study of climate change and society cross-nationally.

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

References

Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8(3), 289–309.

Baker, V. R. (2007). Flood hazard science, policy, and values: A pragmatist stance. Technology and Society, 29, 161–168. (167)

Baldassarri, D., & Diani, M. (2007). The integrative power of civic networks. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 735–780.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

Beck, U. (2002). A life of one's own in a runaway world: Individualization, globalization and politics. In U. Beck & E. Beck-Gernsheim (Eds.), Individualization institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences (pp. 22–29). London: Sage.

Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.

Bodin, Ö., & Prell, C. (2011). Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management:

What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology & Society, 11(2), 395–402.

Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.

Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network. London: Tavistock.

Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125–136.

Broadbent, J. (1998). Environmental politics in Japan: Networks of power and protest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Broadbent, J. (2001). Social capital and labor politics in Japan: Cooperation or cooptation? In J. Montgomery & A. Inkeles (Eds.), Social capital as a policy resource in Asia and the Pacific Basin (pp. 81–95). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Broadbent, J. (2003). Movement in context: Thick networks and Japanese environmental protest. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 204–229). New York: Oxford University Press.

Broadbent, J. (2005). Japan's environmental politics: Recognition and response processes (chapter 5). In H. Imura & M. Schreurs (Eds.), Environmental management in Japan. Washington, D.C.:The World Bank and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Broadbent, J. (2008). Japan's butterfly state: Reciprocity, social capital and embedded networks in

U.S. and German comparison. Unpublished.

Broadbent, J. (2010). Science and climate change policy making: A comparative network perspective. In A. Sumi, K. Fukushi, & A. Hiramatsu (Eds.), Adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change. Tokyo: Springer.

Broadbent, J., Yun, S-J., Ku, D., Ikeda, K., Satoh, K., Pellissery, S., Swarnakar, P., Lin, T-L., Jin, J. (2013). Asian societies and climate change: The variable diffusion of global norms. Globality Studies Journal (#34). Retrieved from globality.cc.stonybrook.edu/wp- content/uploads/2013/07/032JBroadbent.pdf

Brown, G. E., Jr. (1992). Global change and the new definition of progress. Geotimes, 18(21), 19–21.

Brown Weiss, E., & Jacobson, H. K. (Eds.). (1998). Engaging countries: Strengthening compliance with international environmental accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 533pp.

Burridge, S., Vaughter, P., Fisher, D. R., & Weber, J. (2013). A hot mess: Climate change issue definition (or a lack thereof) in the United States News Media. Unpublished manuscript.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Burt, R. (2003). The social capital of structural holes. In M. F. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, &

M. Meyer (Eds.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field

(pp. 148–189). New York: Russell Sage.

Clayton, H. et al. (2006). Is a cross-party consensus on climate change possible – or desirable?

(Report of the first inquiry of the All Parliamentary Climate Change Group). London: HMSO. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2006). What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for comanagement. Ecology & Society, 11(2), 290–312.

Di Gregorio, M. (2012). Networking in environmental movement organization coalitions: Interest, values or discourse? Environmental Politics, 21(1), 1–25.

Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K. J., & Putnam, R. D. (1993). Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

Frank, K. A., & Yasumoto, J. Y. (1998). Linking action to social structure within a system: Social capital within and between subgroups 1. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 642–686.

Ghimire, S. K., McKey, D., & AumeeruddyThomas, Y. (2004). Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management of medicinal plants in the Himalayas of Nepal: Implications for conservation. Ecology and Society, 9(3), 6.

Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change (pp. 59–73). Cambridge: Polity Press. Gouldson, A., Lidskog, R., & Wester-Herber, M. (2007). The battle for hearts and minds.

Evolutions in organisational approaches to environmental risk communication. Environment and Planning C, 25(1), 56–72.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.

American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.

Gustafsson, K., & Lidskog, R. (2012). Acknowledging risk, trusting expertise, and coping with uncertainty: Citizens deliberations on spraying an insect population. Society and Natural Resources, 25, 587–601.

Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). Performing governance through networks. European Political Science, 4(3), 340–47.

Hamilton, C. (2007). Scorcher: The dirty politics of climate change (p. 147). Melbourne: Black Ink Agenda.

Helm, D. (2005). Climate-change policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Höijer, B., Lidskog, R., & Uggla, Y. (2006). Facing dilemmas. Sense-making and decision-making in late modernity. Futures, 38, 350–366.

IPCC. (2007a). Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007b). Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved February 1, 2008, ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg2/ar4-wg2-spm.pdf

Jacobson, H., & Weiss, E. B. (1998). A framework for analysis. In E. B. Weiss & H. Jacobson (Eds.), Engaging countries: Strengthening compliance with international environmental accords (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jaeger, C., Dürrenberger, G., Kastenholz, H., & Truffer, B. (1993). Determinants of environmental action with regard to climate change. Climate Change, 23, 193–211.

Janicke, M. (2002). The policy System's capacity for environmental policy: The framework for comparison. In H. Weidner & M. Janicke (Eds.), Capacity building in national environmental policy: A comparative study of 17 countries (pp. 1–18). Berlin: Springer.

Jasanoff, S. (1998). Contingent knowledge: Implications for implementation and compliance. In E. Brown Weiss & H. K. Jacobson (Eds.), Engaging countries: Strengthening compliance with international environmental accords (p. 65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature. Science and democracy in Europe and the United States.

Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Knoke, D., Pappi, F., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the U.S., Germany and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laumann, E., & Pappi, F. U. (1976). Networks of collective action: A perspective on community influence systems. New York: Academic.

Leifeld, P., & Haunss, S. (2011). Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 50(6).

Leifeld, P., & Haunss, S. (2012). Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 382–409.

Lidskog, R. (2008). Scientised citizens and democratised science. Re-assessing the expert-lay divide. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1–2), 69–86.

Ministry for the Environment. (2007). New Zealand's greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2005 (The National Inventory Report and Common Reporting Format 17). Available at mfe.govt.nz/publications/climate/nir-jul07/nir-jul07.pdf

Mol, A. P. J. (2001). Globalization and environmental reform: The ecological modernization or the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mol, A., & Sonnenfeld, D. (2000). Ecological modernization around the world: Perspectives and critical debates. London: Frank Cass.

Moyes, T. E. (2008). Greenhouse gas emissions trading in New Zealand: Trailblazing comprehensive cap and trade. Ecology Law Quarterly, 35, 911–968.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860–875.

Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty. Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. Los Angeles/London: Sage.

Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29(2), 209–227.

Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.

Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.

Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D., & Weinberg, A. (2003). The treadmill of production and the environmental state. In C. R. Humphrey, T. L. Lewis, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment, energy, and society: Exemplary works (pp. 412–423). Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Schneider, S., Rosencranz, A., & Niles, J. (2002). Climate change policy: A survey. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Schreurs, M. A. (2002). Environmental politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States.

Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shearman, D., & Wayne Smith, J. (2007). The climate change challenge and the failure of democracy (p. 133). London: Praeger.

Siegrist, M., Keller, C., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2005). A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis, 25(1), 211–222.

Slovic, P. (1986). Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Analysis, 6(4), 403–415. Speth, J., & Haas, P. (2006). Global environmental governance. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Tompkins, E. L., & Adger, W. N. (2004). Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climatic change? Ecology and Society, 9(2), 10.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

UNFCCC. (2007, November 19). Subsidiary body for implementation, compilation and synthesis of fourth national communications. Executive Summary 5, UN Doc, FCCC/SBI/2007/INF.6.

Van Dijk, E. M. (2011). Portraying real science in science communication. Science Education, 95, 1086–1100.

Vaughter, P. (2013). Can the Kiwi Ets Fly?: Climate Change Policy and Rhetoric within the New Zealand News Media. Unpublished manuscript.

Walls, J., Pidgeon, N., Weyman, A., & Horlick-Jones, T. (2004). Critical trust: Understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation. Health, Risk & Society, 6(2), 133–150.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1997). Social network analysis: Methods and applications.

New York: Cambridge University Press.

Watson, B. D. (2002). Rethinking organizational learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne.

Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 181–202.

Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & deLeon, P. (2011). A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 349–360.

Weidner, H., & Janicke, M. (2002). Summary: Environmental capacity building in a converging world. In H. Weidner & M. Janicke (Eds.), Capacity building in national environmental policy: A comparative study of 17 countries (pp. 409–443). Berlin/New York: Springer.

Weimann, G. (1982). On the importance of marginality: One more step into the two-step flow of communication. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 764–773.

Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Zafonte, M., & Sabatier, P. A. (1998). Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 473–505.

 
Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >