Home Business & Finance
Table of Contents:
Critical Success Factors and Procurement Cycle
It is useful to relate the 8 Cs to the steps in the procurement cycle. This aspect can clarify the CSFs and evaluate better how it can support the procurement processes. Figure 4.1 shows which are the main CSFs for each of the procurement 4.0 subprocesses. All of them are important for each subprocess. Some factors are more important than others.
Figure 4.2 shows a graphical representation of the business model for procurement
4.0. With respect to each of the factors, Figure 4.2 also lists the enabling solutions to leverage procurement procedures, processes, and digitization supporting each component. It is not necessary to comply all the factors and the solutions examined in this chapter, but at least a certain number of them.
FIGURE 4.1 Procurement processes and CSFs.
FIGURE 4.2 CSFs model for procurement 4.0 and the supporting tools (Adapted from Nicoletti, 2020).
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) can support Cybernetics (Van der Aalst et al., 2018). RPA is the automation of simple and repetitive activities, which need no longer be carried directly by the procurement team. It is implemented with both physical and virtual robots.
The Connection can be implemented cheaply and effectively via the cloud, mainly the Internet. This solution allows to access from everywhere and any device, the applications that manage industry 4.0 and in particular procurement 4.0 (Nicoletti, 2013). It allows cheaply connecting partners even if small and not with many interactions.
Computer numerical controls (CNC) support Controllership. CNC is a method for automating control of machine tools through the use of software embedded in a microcomputer attached to the tool (Radhakrishnan, 2014). It is commonly used in manufacturing for machining metal and plastic parts. In procurement 4.0, this tool is extended to the entire production cycle or at least its principal steps. CNC can automatically provide information to procurement and partners on their needs of sourcing.
Collaboration has its basis on smart systems. They are applications and methods that can mimic human muscular and nervous systems. Smart systems collate leading technologies and solutions for the design of new generation embedded and cyber-physical systems (Crepaldi et al., 2014). They can be applied to a broad range of application domains, from everyday life to mission and safety critical activities. They can achieve a wide set of functionalities using diverse architectures. Thanks to them, collaboration can be automated and made more effective, efficient, and economic.
Internet of Things (IoT) can support Connection (Manavalan and Jayakrishna, 2019). IoT is the interconnection via the internet or the intranet of computing devices enclosed in everyday objects, enabling them to send and receive data. IoT can be used in logistics, warehousing, and transportation.
Assisted cognition systems mimic functions of the human brain in different ways, including natural language processing, data mining, and pattern recognition (Kautz et ah, 2003). Big Data Analytics can support Cognition. Cognition robots (physical or virtual) can help the administrative work connected with procurement or the selection of potential partners to hire. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) is the business process for managing and integrating the relevant parts of the organization. ERP software applications are essential to organizations as they help implement resource planning by integrating all of the processes needed to run organizations with an integrated system using a consolidated data base. An ERP software system can integrate planning, sales, marketing, purchasing, inventory, production, maintenance, administration and finance, human resources, and more. ERP applications can help Coordination within an organization. When they are extended to include other partners in the organization ecosystem, they are labeled as Extended ERP applications (Plikynas, 2008).
Cybersecurity solutions can help Confidence (Singer, and Friedman, 2014). Another emerging solution is blockchain, a computerized open ledger in which it is possible to record every type of transaction for a specific application (Harshak et al., 2013). The blockchain is available for all participants. If registered, a participant may also enter new data. They can see and check it. There is a log that allows standard visibility of operations and services. The automatic sharing of the data eliminates the need for data transfer between organizations. One can also imagine blockchain as “digital trust” (Harshak et al., 2013). This expression indicates that the blockchain is a set of data that can be considered reliable. Their correctness is based on the fact that a large number of actors have a consensus on them. From a technical point of view, a blockchain is a secure database. It is managed through a global network of independent servers. They provide a shared vision. Blockchain solutions are located in the cloud. So, they are easy to access from any location. Blockchain solutions help to eliminate all differences of data between partners and customers. They may provide the test according to where the materials originate, such as certified areas, environmentally and socially responsible. For example, blockchain solutions support the management of products and partner quality certificates, proofs of ownership, references of a specific partner, contracts, and purchase orders. They could help organizations quickly resolve delivery differences in the data end-to-end throughout the full process from request to payment.
Application of the Model
Alfa is a multinational food business operating in the global markets, with annual sales of two billion euros (The name is fictitious due to a nondisclosure request) (Perona, 2019). For moving to procurement 4.0, this company planned to use the following solutions:
• Cybernetics through RPA. It is the automation of simple and repetitive activities, which need no longer be carried out by the procurement team.
An example of this activity is the verification of the completeness of the documents provided by the bidders in a tender. This solution can verify if the managers have approved the order and all the operational and administrative steps required are complete.
The use of these solutions can bring benefits, such as the possibility of reducing the number of the procurement office staff of 41 full-time equivalents (FTEs) out of 112, corresponding to 37% of the total procurement workforce. There are other benefits regarding procured materials and services. They can decrease the procurement costs of these materials/services, delivery times and time reliability, quality of materials and services, and similar.
The benefits can be analyzed based on the organization’s and process points of view and that of the processes.
The procurement organization is composed of the following:
The organizational benefits are relative to the back-office, middle-office, and front- office innovations:
The improvement in the processes can be strategic, tactical, and transactional benefits.
Conclusions, Practical Implications, and Future Research
This chapter presents an innovative and integrated set of CSFs for procurement 4.0 and of the tools which can support them. It is composed of eight CSFs that are synergetic among themselves: Cybernetics, Communication, Control, Collaboration, Connection, Cognition, Coordination, and Confidence. The scope of Procurement 4.0 is creating new additional value propositions, supporting old and new business needs, and moving to a data-driven organization based on Big Data Analytics with data across different functions and value chains (Strategy & PwC, 2016).
Transformation into a data-driven, linked innovation needs to follow the eight factors described above. It takes years, since - in addition to digitization of processes- a culture change and empowerment of procurement are required. The early implemented of procurement 4.0 in several industries digitally transformed in the medium-long term their businesses by integrating all the listed factors into their internal and value network.
The factors examined are the basis for the success of a procurement 4.0 initiative in a specific organizational context.
The management of the procurement processes is undergoing structural changes. Procurement 4.0 is an essential model to realize and support industry 4.0. It goes beyond it in the creation of an effective, efficient, and economical data-driven procurement. This chapter also defined the solutions that can make procurement 4.0 real (Nicoletti, 2017).
It is not easy to predict what the future reserves. Procurement 4.0 is a revolution with respect to e-procurement. For instance, blockchain solutions, as a digital consensus tool, and smart contracts, as self-executing contracts, are only some examples of future solutions. New solutions will surpass the imagination. Some managerial implications are focusing on procurement 4.0 to stimulate managerial capabilities for the entire organization, starting from procurement 4.0.
The adoption of procurement 4.0 strategies can initiate and support the procurement (and not only) managers. They can get important capabilities in terms of collaborative relationships, operative know-how with the partners, and advanced solutions. At the same time, they can improve transparency and traceability along with the value network basing their decision-making and operations on sound data.
Digitization can improve globalization and communications. Whereas it was once enough to know about specific supply markets such as Asia and Eastern Europe, procurement 4.0 requires a truly global organization. For example, having the core of the procurement organization housed at headquarters might have worked in the past. Looking ahead, more and more procurement team members will be active (physically or virtually) in the most competitive supply markets for each category (Nicoletti, 2017a).
The intervals of time for moving from one industrial revolution to the following one have decreased over time. Procurement 5.0 is approaching. It will be a new way to innovate procurement. The expectation is that more and more the role of procurement will change substantially. It will move from an internal purchasing function to a data-driven controllership and coordination of the ecosystem. This study and related model furnish the CSFs to consider for the realization of the digital transformation to procurement 4.0. They will be necessary to implement also for procurement 5.0.
3D Three Dimensions
BDBA Big Data and Business Analytics
CNC Computer Numerical Controls
CSF Critical Success Factors
FTE Full-Time Equivalent
ICT Information and Communication Technology
LSCM Logistics and Supply Chain Management
RBA Robotic Process Automation
SCA Supply Chain Analytics
STP Straight Through Processing
UK United Kingdom
Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Mangla, S. K., & Luthra S. (2020). Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling, 152, 104502. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502. Accessed 20 October 2019.
Batran, A., Erben. A., & Spell, F. (2017). Procurement 4.0: A Survival Guide in a Digital, Disruptive World. University of Chicago Press Economics Books, Chicago, 1L.
Bienhaus, F., & Haddud, A. (2018). Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitization of procurement and supply chains. Business Process Management Journal, 24(4), 965- 984. https://doi.Org/10.l 108/BPMJ-06-2017-0139. Accessed 20 October 2019.
Crepaldi, M., Grosso, M., Sassone, A., Gallinaro, S., Rinaudo, S., Poncino, M,... & Demarchi, D. (2014). A top-down constraint-driven methodology for smart system design. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 14(1), 37-57.
Essig, M. (2006). Electronic procurement - konzeption und anwendung. In: Zentes, J. (ed.), Handbook Handel. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 735-758.
Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Anosike, A., & Kumar. V. (2019). Supply Chain 4.0: Concepts, maturity and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: A International Journal, 25. 262-282.
Geissbauer, R., Weissbarth, R., & Wetzstein, J. (2016). Procurement 4.0: are you ready for the digital revolution? United States: Strategy & PwC. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/ report/procurernent-4-digital-revolution, Accessed 20 October 2019.
Glas, A. H., & Kleemann, P. D. (2016). The impact of industry 4.0 on procurement and supply management: a conceptual and qualitative analysis. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(5), 55-66.
Gupta. S., Kar. A. K., Baabdullah, A.. & Al-Khowaiter. W. A. (2018). Big data with cognitive computing: A review for the future. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 78-89.
Harshak, A., Schmaus, B„ & Dimitrova, D. (2013), Building a digital culture: how to meet the challenge of multichannel digitization, https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/- Strategyand_Building-a-Digital-Culture.pdf. Accessed 17 November 2019.
Henke, M. & Schulte, A.T. (2015), Einkauf und die 4. Industrielle Revolution. Beschaffung Aktuell, 62(3), 20-21.
Huang, Y. Y., & Handfield, R. B. (2015). Measuring the benefits of ERP on supply management maturity model: A “big data” method. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35, 2-25. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-07-2013-0341.
Kagermann, H. (2014). Chancen von Industrie 4.0 nutzen. In: Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M., & Vogel-Heuser, B. (eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion. Automatisierung und Logistik. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp. 603-614.
Kautz, H., Etzioni, O., Fox, D., Weld, D., & Shastri, L. (2003). Foundations of assisted cognition systems. University of Washington, Computer Science Department, Technical Report.
Keith, B., Vitasek, K., Manrodt, K., & Kling, J. (2016), Strategic Sourcing in the New Economy: Harnessing the Potential of Sourcing Business Models for Modern Procurement. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Kerkhoff, G., Schafer, D., et al. (2017). Procurement 4.0: Digitales Management von Variantenvielfalt zur kontinuierlichen Best-Preis-Sicherung - Etfolgreiche Praxisbeispiele. Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim.
Khanna, A. (2010). Straight Through Processing for the Financial Services. Academic Press. Cambridge, MA.
Kiron, D. (2017). Lessons from becoming a data-driven organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2), 17.
Kliinder, T., Dorseln, J. N., & Steven, M. (2019). Procurement 4.0: How the digital disruption supports cost-reduction in procurement. Production, 29, e20180104. doi:10.1590 /0103-6513.20180104.
Koch, V., Kuge, S., Geissbauer, R„ & Schrauf, S. (2014). Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges of the industrial internet. Strategy & PwC.
Kollmann, T. (2011). E-Business: Grundlagen elektronischer Geschaftsprozesse in der Net Economy. Gabler, Wiesbaden.
Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44, 101976.
Lee, J., Kao, H. A., & Yang, S. (2013), Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment, Procedia CIRP, 16, 3-8.
Luo. H.. Wang. K., Kong. X. T.. Lu, S.. & Qu, T. (2017). Synchronized production and logistics via ubiquitous computing technology. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 45, 99-115. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.01.008. Accessed 12 November 2019.
Manavalan, E., & Jayakrishna, K. (2019). A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 925-953. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.ll.030. Accessed 20 October 2019.
Mohr, S., & Khan, O. (2015). 3D printing and its disruptive impacts on supply chains of the future. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(11), 20.
Nicoletti, B. (2013). Cloud Computing & Financial Services. Palgrave-MacMillan, London, (also translated in Chinese).
Nicoletti, B. (2014). Using Operational Analytics to Achieve a Digitized, Visible Supply Chain. Inbound Logistics.
Nicoletti, B. (2017a). Agile Procurement. Volume I: Adding Value with Lean Processes. Springer International Publishing, London. ISBN 978-3-319-61082-5.
Nicoletti, B. (2020). Procurement 4.0 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Springer International Publishing, London.
Pellengahr, K., Schulte. A. T., Richard, J., & Berg. M. (2016). Pilot Study on Procurement 4.0. The Digitalization of Procurement, Frankfurt, Germany.
Perona, M. (2019). Procurement 4.0, the check list for Digital Procurement, https:// www.digital4.biz/procurement/ufficio-acquisti-digitale-cose-quali-benefici-del- procurement-4-О/. Accessed 20 March 2019.
Plikynas, D. (2008). Extended enterprise resource planning: conceptual approach using multiagent systems. In WSEAS International Conference. Proceedings. Mathematics and Computers in Science and Engineering (No. 10). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society.
Radhakrishnan, P. (2014). Computer Numerical Control Machines and Computer Aided Manufacture. New Academic Science Ltd, London.
Russom, P. (2011). Big data analytics. TDW1 Best Practices Report, Fourth Quarter, 19(4), 1-34.
Sanz, L. F., Gomez-Perez, J., & Castillo-Martinez, A. (2018). Analysis of the european ICT competence frameworks. In: Ahuja, V., & Rathore, S. (eds.). Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals. IGI Global. Hershey, PA. pp. 225-245.
Schlick, J., Stephan, P, Loskyll, M., & Lappe, D. (2014). Industrie 4.0 in der praktischen Anwendung. In: Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M., & Vogel-Heuser, B. (eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp. 57-84.
Schmidt, R., Mohring, M., Harting, R. C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, R, & Jozinovic, P. (2015). Industry 4.0-potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. In: The International Conference on Business Information Systems. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 16-27.
Schuh, G., Potente, T, Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A. R., & Prote, J. P. (2014), Collaboration mechanisms to increase productivity in the Context of Industrie 4.0. In: Proceedings of the 19"' Robust Manufacturing Conference, CIRP, Bremen, Germany, pp. 51-56.
Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Currency, London.
Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., & Miragliotta, G. (2014). Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. IEEE, pp. 697-701.
Singer, P. W„ & Friedman, A. (2014). Cybersecurity: What Everyone Needs to Know. OUP, New York.
Sreenivas, M., & Srinivas, T. (2008). The role of transportation in logistics chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 1-10.
Sternberg, R. J.. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko. E. L. (eds.) (2003). The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Strategy & PwC. https://www.pwc.nl/en/assets/documents/pwc-industrie-4-0.pdf. Accessed 17 November 2019.
Tsolakis, N„ Bechtsis, D., & Srai, J. S. (2018). Intelligent autonomous vehicles in digital supply chains: from conceptualization, to simulation modelling, to real-world operations. Business Process Management Journal, 25(3), 414-437. https://doi.org/10.1108/ BPMJ-11-2017-0330. Accessed 20 October 2019.
Van der Aalst, W., Bichler, M., & Heinzl, A. (2018). Robotic process automation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(4), 269-272.
Van Weele, A. J. (2010). Purchasing & Supply Chain Management: Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice. Cengage Learning EMEA, Andover.
Vis, I. F. (2006). Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(3), 677-709.
Wang, G„ Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 98-110.
Williams, S. N., Armitage, C. J., Tampe, T., & Dienes, K. (2020). Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A UK-based focus group study. medRxiv.