Home Sociology
|
|
|||||
SummaryTable of Contents:
Although fallacies are arguments that violate normative standards for reasoning, under the right circumstances they are perfectly acceptable. That said, competent arguers should typically avoid them and be able to recognize them. This chapter presented what we called the Big Five fallacies: faulty cause, faulty analogy, faulty sign, hasty generalization, and sweeping generalization. First, faulty causal reasoning—which includes committing the post hoc fallacy, the slippery slope argument, and/or confusing correlation with causation—erroneously assumes that an antecedent event (cause) is responsible for a consequent event (effect). Second, the faulty analogy alleges that two things are similar when, in fact, the things are not comparable in important or relevant respects. Third, faulty sign reasoning occurs when people mistake one thing as a reliable indicator for another thing. Fourth, making hasty generalizations involves jumping to conclusions based on limited information. Finally, making sweeping generalizations involves making unfounded universal claims. This chapter also discussed how each type of fallacious reasoning could be countered. Notes
ReferencesAnderson, E. (2012). True fact: The lack of pirates is causing global warming. Forbes. Retrieved on December 15, 2017 from: www.fbrbes.com/sites/erikaandersen/2012/03/23/true-fact-the-lack-of-pirates-is-causing-global-warming/#3214cc2e3a67. Aristotle (1955). On sophistical refutations (E.S. Forster, trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Banks, S. (2012, March 27). Troubled fashion statement: Slaying of Florida teen Trayvon Martin casts a spotlight on the hoodie. Los Angeles Tinies, p. A-2. Benoit, W.L., Hampie, D. & Benoit, PJ. (Eds) (1992). Readings in argumentation: Pragmatics and discourse analysis. New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co. Carr, P. (2010, May 22). Amazon: You need to change your idiotic customer reviews policy right now. TechCrunch. Retrieved on June 7, 2011 from: http://techcrunch.eom/2010/03/22/im-not-kidding-do-it-now. CatholicCulture.org (2011, March 23). Practicing Catholics more likely than general public to back homosexual unions. Retrieved on June 29, 2011 from: www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/ index.cfm?storyid=9702. Considine, A. (2011, April 22). For Catholics, open attitudes on gay issues. New York Times, Section ST, p. 6. Hamblin, C.L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Meuthuen & Co. Hansen, H.V. & Pinto, R.C. (1995). Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Klein, J. (2012, March 28). Of broccoli and broken bones. Time. Retrieved on August 27, 2012 from: http: //swampland. time.com/2012/03/28/of-broccoli-and-broken-bones. Milbank, D. (2017, September 8). Did lesbians cause hurricanes Irma and Harvey? Washington Post. Retrieved on January 2, 2018 from: www.wasliingtonpost.com/opinions/did-lesbians-cause-hurncanes-irma-and-harvey-god-knows/2017/09/08/638efbca-94bf-l Ie7-89fa-bb822a46da5b_"story.html?utm_term=. a90199df53c0. Mrscience.com (2009, May 23). Where science meets pop culture. Mrscience.com. Retrieved on December 15, 2017 from: www.mrscienceshow.com/2009/05/correlation-of-week-zombies-vampires.html. Murray, M. & Kujundzic, N. (2005). Critical thinking: A textbook for critical reflection. Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Pak, J. (2015, June 8). Malaysia official blames nude tourists for deadly quake. BBC News. Retrieved December 28, 2017 from: www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-33058692. Quinn, M. (2017, August 9). North Korea threats draw comparisons to Cuban missile crisis. Washington Examiner. Retrieved on December 21, 2017 from: www.washingtonexaminer.com/ north-korea-threats-draw-comparisons-to-cuban-missile-crisis/article/2631083. Ravn, K. (2010, October 25). A little superstitious? You’re not alone. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved on May 29, 2011 from: www.latimes.com/health/la-he-superstition-20101025,0,1186650,full.story. Ricco, R. (2007). Individual differences in the analysis of informal reasoning fallacies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 459-484, doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.001. Rodriguez, I.L. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Culture, Language, and Representation, 7, 77-100. Schlecht, L.F. (1991). Classifying fallacies logically. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 53—64, doi: 10.5840/ teachphi!19911411. Seiter, J.S. & Gass, R.H. (2010). Aggressive communication in political contexts. In T.A. Avtgis & A.S. Rancer (Eds), Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research (pp. 217—240). New York: Routledge. Stanley, TJ. (2009). Stop acting rich and start living like a real millionaire. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Statistic Brain (2017). Male and female driving statistics. Statistic Brain. Retrieved on December 16, 2017 from: www.statisticbrain.com/male-and-female-driving-statistics. Tinsdale, C.W. (2007). Fallacies and argument appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press. Vigen, T. (2015). Spurious correlations: Correlation does not equal causation. New York: Hachette Books. Wagner, M. (2015, June 8). Malaysia blames deadly earthquake on naked tourists who dissed mountain’s spirits, plans ceremony to appease gods. New York Daily News. Retrieved August 12, 2017 from: www. nydailynews.com/news/world/malaysia-blames-deadly-earthquake-naked-tourists-article-1.2250340. Walton, D. (1995). A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press. Walton, D. (1998). Ad hominem arguments. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press. Walton, D., Reed, C. & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University'Press. Walworth, J. (2001). Does God punish gays? A statistical approach. Cay & Lesbian Review Worldwide, 8(5), 5. White, J.B. (2015, June 12). Shannon Grove under fire for linking drought to abortion. Sacramento Bee. Retrieved on January 2, 2018 from: www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article 23868907.html. Wreen, M. (2009). Look before you leap. Social Epistemology, 23(2), 89—104. |
<< | CONTENTS | >> |
---|