Home Business & Finance
|
|
|||||
EngineeringDisruptions due to maintenance (or technical) problems are an everyday occurrence in an airline operation. There are numerous reasons of course - from a broken tray table to an engine change, but whatever the problem, each has the potential to disrupt a flight. Most commonly, disruptions occur during service; that is while the aircraft is engaged in scheduled activities. Unserviceabilities may be discovered while undertaking ground inspections during turnarounds between flights, or componentry may fail during any stage of the flight. Aircraft may be grounded and require Engineers and parts before being permitted to continue, or may be cleared to fly with some performance limitation or other restriction. Aircraft can also arrive on the line (at the gate) late after overnight work, can be damaged during handling or ground servicing, by passengers (on-board breakages), or by weather (e.g., hail damage or lightning strikes) and so forth. IOC response Maintenance disruptions can be another area of significant challenge in the IOC. Timely and appropriate engineering advice is crucial to identifying and assessing a problem, and then determining the most efficient course of action to return the aircraft to service. The difficulty for IOCs lies in taking the expert advice on the one hand, while on the other, determining how best to deliver schedule recovery to customers. Depending on all the circumstances of the maintenance issue (and other variances), the IOC will require some or all of the following information:
assess?
Another set of questions addresses different issues, subject to the time of the unserviceability in relation to the scheduled departure time.
Quite specific customer-related considerations also need to be addressed.
With this information gathered (and keeping in mind that circumstances change, information is updated, and new advice may then alter the state of the problem), the IOC can start to consider options: a) If the parts are available and the Engineers can fix the aircraft, an initial ETD (estimated time of departure) may be set for the flight. Nowadays, the digital communications update various airport and other displays as well as passenger hand-held devices, so committing to such times has to reflect a realistic estimate. One difficulty is the opportunity cost that may exist if, having set an ETD, the aircraft becomes serviceable earlier than expected. Either the time would have to be revised to an earlier departure which may be extremely difficult to achieve, or the later ETD has to be respected, with due wastage. This is why an accurate ETS from Engineering is so essential before any advice goes out to the customers. It is also the reason that conservative ETDs are set and may become rolling should rectification take increasingly longer times. In conjunction with Engineering, ideally the aim with regard to an engineering delay is to achieve the published ETS. Timing is crucial to avoid misleading the customers. Underestimating the time and continual revisions result in rolling delays, while overestimating the time wastes opportunities to minimise the disruption.
|
<< | CONTENTS | >> |
---|
Related topics |