The Toolbox Prompts Used in the C4I Strategic Planning Workshops
Each prompt is associated in the instrument with a rating scale (1 = disagree, 5 = agree).
The authors would like to thank the members of the Michigan State University community who participated in the strategic planning workshops described in this chapter. We would also like to thank Evelyn Brister and Robert Frodeman for their careful review of previous versions of this chapter and for all their advice. O’Rourke’s work on this chapter was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1016959.
Baetz, M. C. and Bart, С. K. (1996). Developing mission statements which work. Long Range Planning, 4: 526—533.
Baetz, M. C. and Beamish, P. (1993). Strategic Management: Text, Readings, and Canadian Cases, 3rd edition. Burr Ridge, IL: R. D. Irwin.
Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-world Problems. Canberra: ANU E-Press.
Bosque-Pérez, N. A., Klos, P. Z., Force, J. E., Waits, L. P., Cleary, K., Rhoades, P., Galbraith, S. M., Bentley Brymer, A. L., O’Rourke, M., Eigenbrode, S. D., Finegan, B., Wulfhorst, J. D., Sibelet, N.. and Holbrook, J. D. (2016). A pedagogical model for team-based, problem-focused interdisciplinary doctoral education. BioScience, 66(6): 477-188.
Bracken, L. ). and Oughton, E. A. (2006). “What do you mean?” The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31: 371-382.
Briggle, A. and Frodeman, R. (2016). The institution of philosophy: Escaping disciplinary capture. Metaphilosophy, 47(1): 26-38.
Carroll, A. (1993). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Mason, OH: Southwestern Publishing Co.
Cat, J. (2014). Visual education. Supplement to “Otto Neurath.” In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 edition). Available online at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/neurath/.
Center for Interdisciplinarity (C4I). (2017). Home [webpage]. Available online at: https://c4i.msu.edu/.
Crowley, S., Gonnerman, C., and O’Rourke, M. (2016). Cross-disciplinary research as a platform for philosophical research. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2(2): 344—363.
Donovan, S. M., O’Rourke, M., and Looney, C. (2015). Your hypothesis or mine? Terminological and conceptual variation across disciplines. SHGE Open, 5(2): 1-13.
Eigenbrode, S., O’Rourke, M., Wulfhorst, J. D., Althoff, D. M., Goldberg, C. S., Merrill, K., Morse, W., Nielsen-Pincus, M., Stephens, J., Winowiecki, L., and Bosque-Pérez, N. A. (2007). Employing philosophical dialogue in collaborative science. BioScience, 57: 55-64.
Frodeman, R. (2008). Redefining ecological ethics: Science, policy, and philosophy at Cape Horn. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14: 597-610.
Frodeman, R. and Briggle, A. (2016). Socrates Tenured: The Institutions of 21st Century Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Grünig, R. and Kühn, R. (2018). The Strategy Planning Process, 2nd edition. New York: Springer.
Leie, S. and Norgaard, R. B. (2005). Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience, 55(11): 967-975.
Looney, C., Donovan, S., O’Rourke, M., Crowley, S., Eigenbrode, S. D., Rotschy, L., Bosque-Perez, N. and Wulfhorst, J. D. (2014). Seeing through the eyes of collaborators: Using Toolbox workshops to enhance cross-disciplinary communication. In M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S. D. Eigenbrode, and J. D. Wulfhorst (eds.), Enhancing Communication and Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 220-243.
Nemeth, C. and Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003) Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P. Paulus and B. Nijstad (eds.), Croup Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63-84.
Okhuysen, G. A. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13(4): 370-386.
O’Rourke, M. and Crowley, S. (2013). Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: The story of the Toolbox Project. Synthese, 190: 1937-1954.
Pennock, R. T. and O’Rourke, M. (2017). Developing a scientific virtue-based approach to science ethics training. Science and Engineering Ethics 23(1): 243-262.
Piso, Z., O’Rourke, M., and Weathers, K. C. (2016). Out of the fog: Catalyzing integrative capacity in interdisciplinary research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 56: 84-94.
Salazar, M. R., Lant, T. K., Fiore, S. M., and Salas, E. (2012). Facilitating innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity. Small Croup Research, 43(5): 527-558.
Salazar, M. R., Lant, T. K., and K. Doiron. (2019). Leader integrative capabilities: A catalyst for effective interdisciplinary teams. In K. L. Hall, A. L. Vogel, and R. T. Croyle (eds.), Advancing Social and Behavioral Health Research through Cross-Disciplinary Team Science: Principles for Success. New York: Springer Verlag, 313—328.
Schnapp, L. M., Rotschy, L., Hall, T. E., Crowley, S., and O’Rourke, M. (2012). How to talk to strangers: Facilitating knowledge sharing within translational health teams with the Toolbox dialogue method. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4): 469-479.
Traxler, M. ). (2012). Introduction to Psycholinguistics: Understanding Language Science. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
Tuana, N. (2013). Embedding philosophers in the practices of science: Bringing humanities to the sciences. Synthese, 190: 1955-1973.