Desktop version

Home arrow Geography arrow International Climate Negotiation Factors: Design, Process, Tactics


Altamirano-Cabrera, J., & Finus, M. (2006). Permit trading and stability of international climate agreements. Journal of Applied Economics, 9, 19-48.

Barrett, S. (1991). The problem of global environmental protection. In D. Helm (Ed.), Economic policy towards the environment (pp. 137-155). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Barrett, S. (1999). International cooperation and the international commons. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 10, 131-146.

Barton, J., Goldstein, J., Josling, T., & Steinberg, R. (2006). The evolution of the trade regime: Politics, law, and economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.

Bohringer, C. (2002). Climate politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From little to nothing? The Energy Journal, 23(2), 51-71.

Byrd, R., & Hagel, C. (1997, July 25). Byrd-Hagel resolution105th Congress, 1st session, S. RES.98. Retrieved April 17, 2014 from

Cass, L. (2002). The dilemmas of international climate commitments and energy policy reform in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. International Studies Association.

De Zeeuw, A. (2001). Klimaatonderhandelingen vanuit Speltheoretisch Perspectief. Economisch Statistische Berichten, D28-D31.

Depledge, J. (2004). The organization of global negotiations: Constructing the climate change regime. London, UK: Earthscan.

European Commission (2016). Climate action—Emissions trading scheme (EU ETS). Retrieved May 19, 2016 from

Eyckmans, J., & Finus, M. (2003). Coalition formation in a global warming game: How the design of protocols affects the success of environmental treaty-making. CORE Discussion Papers 2003088. Louvain, Belgium: Universite catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). New York, USA: Penguin Books.

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.

Heck, M., Segers, M., & Terlouw, H. (2004). Theoretische Tradities in de Leer der Internationale Betrekkingen en de Casus Duitsland. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kontinuitat und Diskontinuitaten der Deutschen Aussenpolitik.

IISD (2010, December 13). Summary of the Cancun Climate Change Conference: 29 November- 11 December 2010. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (2013, November 26). Summary of the Warsaw Climate Change Conference: 11-23 November 2013. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, p. 32.

IISD (2015, December 15). Summary of the Paris Climate Change Conference. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, p. 46.

IPCC (2001). Third assessment report: Climate change 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Jepma, C. J. (1995). The feasibility ofjoint implementation (1st ed.). Groningen, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kiyono, K., & Okuno-Fujiwara, M. (2004). Strategic international agreement on global environment management. Tokyo, Japan: CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-279, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.

Matsuo, N. (2003). CDM in the Kyoto negotiations: How CDM has worked as a bridge between developed and developing worlds?. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Meerts, P., & Postma, T. (2005). Ordening door Onderhandeling. Internationale Spectator, 394398.

Nash, J. (1996). Essays on game theory. Edward Elgar.

Neumann, J. v., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.

Nierenberg, G. (1978). The art of negotiating. New York, NY, USA: The Negotiation Institute.

Oakley, R. (2001). Retrieved April 16, 2014 from 2001/WORLD/europe/07/04/climate.analysis/index.html

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Paavola, J. (2011). Climate change: The ultimate tragedy of the commons? In D. Cole & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Property in land and other resources. Cambridge, MA, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Ray, I. (2000). Game theory and the environment: Old models, new solution concepts. York, UK: Department of Economics, University of York.

Siegele, L. (2013). Procedural rules of the climate negotiations. London.

Sprangler, B. (2012, July). Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA). Retrieved April 16, 2014 from Beyond Intractability:

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009, July 19). Evolutionary game theory. Retrieved April 15, 2014 from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: evolutionary/

Tulkens, H. (1998). Co-operation versus free-riding in international environmental affairs: Two approaches. In N. Hanley & H. Folmer (Eds.), Game theory and the environment (pp. 30-44). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

UNFCCC (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (1996). Organizational matters—Adoption of the rules of procedure—Note BY THE SECRETARIAT. Geneva, Switzerland: UNFCCC secretariat for second session of Conference of the Parties.

UNFCCC (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (2014a). Status of ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved April 16, 2014 from

UNFCCC (2014b). Party groupings. Retrieved November 12, 2014 from and_observers/parties/negotiating_groups/items/2714.php

UNFCCC (2015). Session archive (ADP). Retrieved May 16, 2016 from meetings/items/6237.php?filtbody=296

UNFCCC (n.d.). Bodies. Retrieved from

UNFCCC-CMP (2006). Decision 1/CMP.1—Consideration of commitments for subsequent periods for parties included in Annex I to the convention under Article 3, paragraph 9, of the Kyoto protocol. Bonn, Germany: United Framework Convention on Climate Change.

van der Gaast, W., & Begg, K. (2012). Challenges and solutions for climate change. London, UK: Springer.

Wertheim, E. (n.d.). Negotiations and resolving conflicts: An overview. Retrieved April 16, 2014 from Webarchive IIASA: conflict_overview.html

Wijen, F., & Zoeteman, K. (2004). Past and future of the Kyoto Protocol. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Globus- Institute for Globalization and Sustainable Development, Tilburg University.

WRI (2009). Navigating the numbers—Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. Retrieved April 16, 2014 from World Resources Institute: navigating-numbers

< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >