Desktop version

Home arrow Geography arrow International Climate Negotiation Factors: Design, Process, Tactics

References

Arts, B. (1998). The political influence of global NGOs. Case studies on the climate and biodiversity conventions. Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Books.

Baker & McKenzie (2003). Client alert: Timeline for Russian Federation Ratification of Kyoto Protocol. Chicago IL, USA: Baker & McKenzie.

Bernard, A., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J., Vielle, M., & Viguier, L. (2003). Russia’s role in the Kyoto protocol, report no. 98. Cambridge MA, USA: MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.

Byrd, R., & Hagel, C. (1997, July 25). Byrd-Hagel resolution105th congress, 1st Session, S. RES.98. Retrieved April 17, 2014, from http://www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoSenate.html

Cubasch, U., Wuebbles, D., Chen, D., Facchini, M., Frame, D., Mahowald, N., et al. (2013). Introduction. In T. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. Allen, J. Boschung, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 121-155). Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Dessai, S., & Schipper, E. (2003). The Marrakech accords to the Kyoto protocol: Analysis and future prospects. Global Environmental Change, 13, 149-153.

Fenhann, J. (2016, July 20). CDM/JI pipeline analysis and database. Retrieved from http:// cdmpipeline.org

Government of the Russian Federation (2013, December 30). Submitted national communications. Retrieved April 18, 2014, from http://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/annex_i_natcom/ submitted_natcom/application/pdf/6nc_rus_2013-12-30[1].pdf

Henry, L., & McIntosh Sundstrom, L. (2007). Russia and the Kyoto protocol: Seeking an alignment of interests and image. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 47-69.

Hyvarinen, J. (2000). Best practices in policies and measures to address climate change: Opportunities for the UK and Germany in the international negotiation process. UK: Institute for European Environmental Policy.

IISD (1995-1997). Reports on sessions of the ad hoc group on the Berlin Mandate, SBSTA/SBI sessions, COP2 and COP3. Earth negotiations bulletin. Retrieved April 17, 2014, from http:// www.iisd.ca/vol12/

IISD (1995a). Summary of the eleventh session of the INC for a framework convention on climate change 6-17 February 1995. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1995b). Summary of the first conference of the parties for the framework convention on climate change: 28 March-7 April 1995. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1995c). Report on the second session of the ad hoc group on the Berlin Mandate: 30 October-3 November 1995. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1996a). Summary of the second conference of the parties to the framework convention on climate change. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1996b). Report of the meetings of the subsidiary bodies on the UN framework convention on climate change: 9-18 December 1996. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1997a). Report of the meetings of the FCCC subsidiary bodies: 20-31 October 1997. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1997b). Report of the third conference of the parties to the United Nations framework convention on climate change: 1-11 December 1997. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1997c). Report of the meetings of the subsidiary bodies to the framework convention on climate change. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (1997d). Report of the sixth session of the ad hoc group on the Berlin Mandate. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (2000a, September 18). Summary of the thirteenth sessions of the subsidiary bodies of the UN framework convention on climate change: 4-15 September 2000. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (2000b). Summary of the sixth conference of the parties to the framework convention on climate change. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

IISD (2001). Summary of the resumed sixth session of the conference of the parties to the UN framework convention on climate change: 16-27 July 2001. Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

Illarionov, A., & Pivovarova, N. (2004). Economic consequences of the Russian Federation’s ratification of the Kyoto protocol (Ekonomicheskie posledstviia ratifikatsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii Kiotskogo protokola). Voprosy ekonomiki, 11, 34-59.

INC (1995a). A/AC.237/91 and Add.1. New York, USA: Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee.

IPCC (1995). Second assessment report: Climate change—Summary for policy makers. Geneve, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Jepma, C., van der Gaast, W., & Woerdman, E. (1998). The compatibility of flexible instruments under the Kyoto protocol. Bilthoven, The Hague, The Netherlands: Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change.

JIN (2003). e-Joint Implementatation Quarterly, nr2. Groningen, The Netherlands: Joint Implementation Network.

Phylipsen, G., Bode, J., Blok, K., Merkus, H., & Metz, B. (1998). A triptych sectoral approach to burden sharing: GHG emissions in the European bubble. Energy Policy, 26(12), 929-943.

The Boston Globe (2004, May 22). Putin promises to ratify Kyoto treaty—Move paves way for Russia to join world trade group. Retrieved April 18, 2014

The Economist (2003, December 6). Is Kyoto dead? The Economist.

UNFCCC (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (1995a). Decision 1/CP.1—The Berlin Mandate: Review of the Adequacy of Article 4, paragraph 2(a) and (b), of the Convention (including proposals related to a protocol and decisions on follow-up). Berlin, Germany: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (1996b). Report of the conference of the parties on its second session, held at Geneva from 8 to 15 July 1996FCCC/CP/1996/15/Add.1. Bonn, Germany: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (1997a). Framework compilation of proposals from parties for the elements of a protocol or another legal instrumentAddendum: Note by the Chairman,

FCCC/AGBM/1997/2/Add.1. Bonn, Germany: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (1997b). Adoption of a protocol or another legal instrument: Fulfillment of the Berlin Mandate—Revised text under Negotiation—Note by the secretariat. Kyoto, Japan: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (1998a). Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn: UNFCCC.

UNFCCC (1998b). Decision 1/CP.4—The Buenos Aires Plan of Action,

FCCC/CP/1998/16/Add.1. Bonn, Germany: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

UNFCCC (2001). The Marrakech accord, decision 2/CP.7, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1. Bonn, Germany: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

UNFCCC (2014). Status of ratification of the Kyoto protocol. Retrieved April 16, 2014, from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/status_of_ratification/items/2613.php US EPA (2011). U.S. greenhouse gas inventory report archive. Retrieved April 17, 2014, from http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/usinventoryreport/archive.html Walsh, N. (2003, December 5). Moscow refuses to ratify treaty on climate change. Retrieved April 18, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/dec/05/russia.climatechange Zhang, Z. (2001). An assessment of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms. Ecological Economics, 37(1), 53-69.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >