Desktop version

Home arrow Language & Literature


Abu-Mostafa, Yaser S., Magdon-Ismail, Malik, and Hsuan-Tien, Lin (2012). Learning from Data: A Short Course. AMLBook.

Ackerman, Farrell, Blevins, James P., and Malouf, Robert (2009). Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition (eds. J. P Blevins and J. Blevins), pp. 54-81. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ackerman, Farrell and Malouf, Robert (2013). Morphological organization: The Low Conditional Entropy Conjecture. Language, 89, 429-464.

Ackerman, Farrell and Malouf, Robert (2015). The No Blur Principle effects as an emergent property of language systems. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (eds. A. E. Jurgensen, H. Sande, S. Lamoureux, K. Baclawski, and A. Zerbe), pp. 1-14.

Ackerman, Farrell and Stump, Gregory T. (2004). Paradigms and periphrastic expression: A study in realization-based lexicalism. In Projecting Syntax (eds. A. J. Spencer and L. Sadler), pp. 111-158. CSLI, Stanford.

Albright, Adam C. (2002). The Identification of Bases in Morphological Paradigms. Ph.D. thesis, UCLA.

Anderson, Stephen R. (1982). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 571-612.

Anderson, Stephen R. (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth Century. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Anderson, Stephen R. (1986). Disjunctive ordering in inflectional morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4,1-32.

Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Anderson, Stephen R. (2015). The morpheme: Its nature and use. In The Oxford Handbook of Inflection (ed. M. Baerman) Chapter 2, pp. 11-34. Oxford University Press.

Arnon, Inbal and Ramscar, Michael (2012). Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 122, 292-305.

Aronoff, Mark (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Aronoff, Mark (1998). Isomorphism and monotonicity. In Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax (eds. S. G. Lapointe and D. Brentari), pp. 411-418. CSLI, Stanford.

Aronoff, Mark (1999). Le systeme malgre lui. In Fonologia e morfologia dell’italiano e dei dialetti d’Italia (eds. P Beninca, A. Mioni, and L. Vanelli), pp. 321-322. Bulzoni, Rome.

Aronoff, Mark (2012). Morphological stems: What William of Ockham really said. Word Structure, 5, 28-51.

Aronson, Howard I. (1990). Georgian: A Reading Grammar. Slavica, Columbus, OH.

Ashton, Eric Ormerod (1944). Swahili Grammar. Longmans, Green & Co.

Aspillera, Paraluman S. (1981). Basic Tagalog. M&L Licudine Enterprises, Manila.

Attneave, Fred (1959). Applications of Information Theory to Psychology: A Summary of Basic Concepts, Methods and Results. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Austerlitz, Robert (1966). Finnish Reader and Glossary. Mouton, The Hague.

Baayen, R. Harald (2010). Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon, 5, 436-461.

Baayen, R. Harald, Feldman, Laurie B., and Schreuder, Robert (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496-512.

Baayen, R. Harald, Hendrix, Peter, and Ramscar, Michael (2013). Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: Towards a processing model based on discriminative learning. Language and Speech, 56, 329-347.

Baayen, R. Harald, Lieber, Rochelle, and Schreuder, Robert (1997). The morphological complexity of simple nouns. Linguistics, 35, 861-877.

Baayen, R. Harald, McQueen, James M., Dijkstra, Teun, and Schreuder, Robert (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing (eds. R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder), pp. 355-370. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Baayen, R. Harald, Milin, Petar, Filipovic Durdevic, Dusica, Hendrix, Peter, and Marelli, Marco (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438-481.

Baayen, R. Harald, Piepenbrock, R., and van Rijn, H. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2, CD-ROM edn.). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Baayen, R. Harald, Shaoul, Cyrus, Willits, Jon, and Ramscar, Michael (2016). Comprehension without segmentation: A proof of concept with naive discrimination learning. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience., 31(1), 106-128.

Baayen, R. Harald, Wurm, Lee H., and Aycock, Joanna (2008). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 419-463.

Bach, Emmon (1979). Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 10,


Bach, Emmon (1980). In defense of passive. Linguistics and Philosophy, 3,


Bach, Emmon and Wheeler, Deirdre (1983). Montague Phonology: A first approximation. In UMOP 7, pp. 27-45. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan, and Corbett, Greville G. (2005). The Syntax- Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Balling, Laura and Baayen, R. Harald (2012). Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words. Cognition, 125, 80-106.

Baric, Eugenija, Loncaric, Mijo, Malic, Dragica, Paveisic, Slavko, Mirko, Peti, Zece- vic, Vesna, and Znika, Marija (2005). Hrvatska Gramatika (4th edn.). Skolska kniga, Zagreb.

Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan (1895). Versuch einer Theorie phonetischer Alter- nationen; ein Kapital aus der Psychophonetic. Trubner, Strassburg. Reprinted as ‘An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations’ in Stankiewicz (1972), 144-212.

Beard, Robert (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. SUNY Press, Cambridge.

Bickel, Balthasar (1994). In the vestibule of meaning: Transitivity inversion as a morphological phenomenon. Studies in Language, 19(1), 73-127.

Blevins, James P (2001). Realization-based lexicalism. Journal of Linguistics, 37, 355-365.

Blevins, James P. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language, 79(2), 737-767.

Blevins, James P (2006b). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 42,


Blevins, James P. (2007). Conjugation classes in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica, 43(4), 250-267.

Blevins, James P (2008a). Declension classes in Estonian. Linguistica Ural-

ica, 44(4), 241-267.

Blevins, James P (2008b). The post-transformational enterprise. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 723-742.

Blevins, James P. (2011). Feature-based grammar. In Nontransformational Syntax (eds. R. D. Borsley and K. Borjars), pp. 297-324. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Blevins, James P. (2013). American descriptivism (‘structuralism’). In Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics (ed. K. Allan), Chapter 18, pp. 419-437. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Blevins, James P. (2016). The minimal sign. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology (eds. G. T. Stump and A. Hippisley), Chapter 3, pp. 50-69. Cambridge University Press.

Blevins, James P. (2015b). Thematic inversion in Georgian. Ms., University of Cambridge.

Blevins, James P., Ackerman, Farrell, and Malouf, Robert (2008). An information- based measure of morphological information. 3rd Workshop on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics, Helsinki.

Blevins, James P. and Blevins, Juliette (eds.) (2009). Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Blevins, James P., Booij, Geert, Milin, Petar, and Ramscar, Michael (2016a). Inflection at the morphology-syntax interface. In Word Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon (eds. V. Pirrelli, I. Plag, and W. U. Dressler), (to appear). De Gruyter, Berlin.

Blevins, James P, Milin, Petar, and Ramscar, Michael (2016b). The Zipfian paradigm cell filling problem. In Perspectives on Morphological Structure: Data and Analyses (eds. F. Kiefer, J. P Blevins, and H. Bartos), (in press). Brill, Leiden.

Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Blevins, Juliette (2006a). A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics, 32,117-165.

Blevins, Juliette (2014). Evolutionary phonology: A holistic approach to sound change typology. In Handbook of Historical Phonology (eds. P. Honeybone and J. Salmons). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Bloch, Bernard (1947). English verb inflection. Language, 23, 399-418. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 243-254.

Bloch, Bernard (1948). A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language, 24,


Bloomer, Aileen, Griffiths, Patrick, and Merrison, Andrew (2004). Introducing Language in Use. Routledge, London.

Bloomfield, Leonard (1914). Sentence and word. Transactions of the American Philological Society, 45, 65-75. Reprinted in Hockett (1970), 38-46.

Bloomfield, Leonard (1926). A set of postulates for the science of language. Language, 2,153-164. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 26-37.

Bloomfield, Leonard (1929). Review of Konkordanz Pamni-Candra by Bruno Liebich. Language, 5, 267-276. Reprinted in Hockett (1970), 219-226.

Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Bochner, Harry (1993). Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Mouton de Gruyter.

Bolinger, Dwight (1979). Meaning and memory. In Experience Forms: Their Cultural and Individual Place and Function (eds. G. G. Haydu), pp. 95-112. Mouton, The Hague.

Bonami, Olivier and Boye, Gilles (2003). Suppletion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugaison du fran^ais. Langages, 152,102-126.

Bonami, Olivier and Boye, Gilles (2006). Deriving inflectional irregularity. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (eds. S. Muller), pp. 361-380. CSLI Publications, Paris.

Bonami, Olivier and Boye, Gilles (2007). Remarques sur les bases de la conjugaison. In Des sons et des sens (eds. E. Delais-Roussarie and L. Labrune), pp. 77-90. Hermes Sciences, Paris.

Bonami, Olivier and Luis, Ana (2013). Causes and consequences of complexity in Portuguese verbal paradigms. Paper presented at the 9th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Dubrovnik.

Bonami, Olivier and Luis, Ana (2014). Sur la morphologie implicative dans la conjugaison du portugais: Une etude quantitative. In Morphologie flexionnelle et dialectologie romane. Typologie(s) et modelisation(s) (ed. J.-L. Leonard), Number 22 in Memoires de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris, pp. 111-151. Peters, Leuven.

Bonami, Olivier and Stump, Gregory T. (2015). Paradigm Function Morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology (eds. A. Hippisley and G. T. Stump) Chapter 17, pp. 449-481. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Booij, Geert (1993). Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 27-49. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Booij, Geert (1996). Inherent verses contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 1-16. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Booij, Geert (1997). Autonomous morphology and paradigmatic relations. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 35-53. Kluwer.

Booij, Geert (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Brown, Dunstan (1998). Stem indexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb: A network morphology account. In Models of Inflection (eds. F. Ray, A. Ortmann, and T. Parodi), pp. 196-224. Niemeyer, Tubingen.

Brown, Dunstan and Hippisley, Andrew. (2012). Network Morphology: A Defaults- based Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Bybee, Joan L. (1999). Use impacts morphological representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(6), 1016-7.

Bybee, Joan L. (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bybee, Joan L. (2007). Frequency ofUse and the Organization ofLanguage. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Bybee, Joan L. (2010). Language, Usage and Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J. (eds.) (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Typological Studies in Languages, 45. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Carmack, Stanford (1997). Blocking in Georgian verb morphology. Language, 72,


Carroll, John B. (1953). The Study of Language: A Survey of Linguistics and Related Disciplines in America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Carstairs, Andrew (1983). Paradigm economy. Journal of Linguistics, 19,115-125.

Carstairs, Andrew (1987). Allomorphy in Inflexion. Croom Helm, London.

Carstairs, Andrew (1988). Paradigm economy: A reply to Nyman. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 489-499.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1991). Inflection classes: Two questions with one answer. In Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection (ed. F. Plank), pp. 213-253. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1994). Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language, 70, 737-788.

Chersi, Fabian, Ferro, Marcello, Pezzulo, Giovanni, and Pirrelli, Vito (2014). Topological self-organization and prediction learning support both action and lexical chains in the brain. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(3), 476-491.

Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Chomsky, Noam (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar (eds. R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum), pp. 184-221. Ginn and Company, Waltham. Reprinted in Chomsky (1976), 1-61.

Chomsky, Noam (1975). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Chomsky, Noam (1976). Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar.Mouton, The Hague.

Chomsky, Noam (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics, 1, 97-138.

Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row, New York.

Clahsen, Harald (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1013.

Clahsen, Harald, Rothweiler, Monika, Woest, Andreas, and Marcus, Gary F. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45, 201-249.

Clark, Alexander and Lappin, Shalom (2011). Linguistic Nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus. Wiley-Blackwell.

Clark, Eve V. (1987). The Principle of Contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (ed. B. MacWhinney), pp. 1-33. Erlbaum, Hillsdate, NJ.

Comrie, Bernard (1981). The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Corbett, Greville (1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Corbett, Greville and Fraser, Norman (1993). Network Morphology: A datr account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics, 29,113-142.

Cordona, George (1994). Indian linguistics. In History ofLinguistics I: The Eastern Traditions of Linguistics (ed. L. Guilio), pp. 25-60. Longman, London.

Cover, Thomas M. and Thomas, Joy A. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. Wiley-Blackwell.

Crysmann, Berthold and Bonami, Olivier (2012). Establishing order in type-based realizational morphology. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (ed. S. Muller), pp. 123-143. CSLI Publications.

Curme, George O. (1922). A Grammar of the German Language. Macmillan, London.

Curme, George O. (1935). A Grammar of the English Language. Heath, Boston.

Daelemans, Walter and Van den Bosch, Antal (2005). Memory-Based Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Dalrymple, Mary (2001). Lexical Functional Grammar. Academic Press.

Davis, Matt, Marslen-Wilson, WilliamD., andGaskell, M.G. (2002). Leading up the lexical garden-path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 218-244.

de Jong, Nivja H. (2002). Morphological Families in the Mental Lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen.

Diessel, Holger (2015). Usage-based construction grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (ed. E. Dabrowska and D. Divak). Mouton de Gruyter.

Dixon, R. M. W and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (ed.) (2002). Word: A CrossLinguistic Typology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Drager, Katie K. (2011). Sociophonetic variation and the lemma. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 694-707.

Dressler, Wolfgang U. (1987). Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Dromi, Esther (1987). Early Lexical Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Duden (2005). Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartsprache. Dudenverlag, Mannheim.

Elman, Jeffrey L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14,179-211.

Emeneau, Murray B (1988). Bloomfield and Pamni. Language, 64, 755-760.

Erelt, Mati (eds.) (2003). Estonian Language. Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn.

Erelt, Mati, Erelt, Tiiu, and Ross, Kristiina (2000). Eesti keele kasiraamat. Eesti Keele Sihtasutus, Tallinn.

Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Saari, Henn, Tael, Kaja, and Vare, Silvi (1995). Eesti Keele Grammatika. Volume I: Morfoloogia. Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut, Tallinn.

Erelt, Tiiu (ed.) (2006). Eesti keele oigekeelsussonaraamat OS 2006. Eesti Keele Siht- asutus, Tallinn.

Erelt, Tiiu, Leemets, Tiina, Maearu, and Raadik, Maire (eds.) (2013). Eesti keele oigekeelsussonaraamat OS 2013. Eesti Keele Sihtasutus, Tallinn.

Finkel, Raphael and Stump, Gregory T. (2009). Principal parts and degrees of paradigmatic transparency. In Blevins and Blevins (2009), pp. 13-52.

Finkel, Raphael and Stump, Gregory T. (2007). Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology, 17, 39-75.

Firth, J. R. (1948). Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society, 127-152.

Firth, J. R. (1951). General linguistics and descriptive grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society, 69-87.

Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955. In Studies in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1-32. Philological Society, Oxford.

Ford, Alan, Singh, Rajendra, and Martohardjono, Gita (1997). Pace Pamni. American University Studies: Series 13, Linguistics. Vol. 34. Peter Lang Verlag, Berlin.

Fought, John (1999). Introduction. In Leonard Bloomfield: Critical Assessments of Leading Linguists (ed. J. Fought), Volume 1, pp. 1-26. Routledge.

Fromkin, Victoria, Rodman, Robert, and Hyams, Nina (2010). An Introduction to Language (9th edn.). Wadsworth, Boston.

Gahl, Suzanne (2008). “Thyme” and “Time” are not homophones. The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474-496.

Gahl, Suzanne, Yao, Yao, and Johnson, Keith (2011). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 789-806.

Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, Ewan, Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Sag, Ivan A. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Geertzen, Jeroen, Blevins, James P., and Milin, Petar (2016). The entropy of linguistic unit boundaries. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 1-24.

Gerken, LouAnn and Balcomb, Francis K. (2010). Three observations about infant generalization and their implications for generalization mechanisms. In Generalization of Knowledge: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (eds. M. T. Banach and D. Caccamise), pp. 73-88. Taylor & Francis, New York.

Gildersleeve, B. L. and Lodge, G. (1895). Gildersleeves Latin Grammar. Macmillan & Co., New York. Reprinted by Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Inc., 2000.

Gleason, Henry Allan (1955). An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Goldberg, Adele (2005). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Goldwater, Sharon, Griffiths, Thomas L., and Johnson, Mark (2009). A Bayesian framework for word segmentation: Exploring the effects of context. Cognition, 112, 21-54.

Goodwin, W. W. (1894). Greek Grammar. MacMillan, London.

Green, John N. (1997). Spanish. In The Romance Languages (eds. M. Harris and N. Vincent), pp. 79-130. Routledge, London.

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1966). The Languages of Africa (2nd edn.). Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1987). The Languages of America. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Grunthal, Riho (2003). Finnic Adpositions and Cases in Change. Societe Finno- Ougrienne, Helsinki.

Hakkinen, Kaisa (ed.) (1990). Nykysuomen Sanakirja: Etymologinen Sanakirja (6 edn.). WSOY, Helsinki.

Hale, John (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Asssociation for Computational Linguistics, pp. 159-166.

Hale, John (2003). The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psychological Research, 32(2), 101-123.

Hale, John (2006). Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 643-672.

Hale, William Gardner and Buck, Carl Darling (1903). A Latin Grammar. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Hall, RobertA. Jr. (1987). Bloomfield andsemantics. Historiographia Linguistica, 14, 155-160.

Halle, Morris (1959). The Sound Pattern of Russian. Mouton, The Hague.

Halle, Morris and Marantz, Alec (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from Building 20 (eds. K. Hale and S. J. Keyser), pp. 111-176. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Hamp, Eric, Householder, Fred W., and Austerlitz, Robert (eds.) (1966). Readings in Linguistics II. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Harris, Alice C. (1981). Georgian Syntax: A Study in Relational Grammar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Harris, Alice C. (1984). Inversion as a rule of universal grammar: Georgian evidence. In Studies in Relational Grammar 2 (eds. D. M. Perlmutter and C. Rosen), pp. 259-291. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Harris, Alice C. (2009). Exuberant exponence in Batsbi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, 267-303.

Harris, Zellig S. (1941). Linguistic structure of Hebrew. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 61,143-167.

Harris, Zellig S. (1942). Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Language, 18, 169-180. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 109-115.

Harris, Zellig S. (1951). Methods in Structural Linguistics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Harris, Zellig S. (1954). Distributional structure. Word, 10(23), 146-162.

Haspelmath, Martin (1993). A Grammar ofLezgian. Mouton, Berlin.

Haspelmath, Martin (1996). Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 43-66. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Haspelmath, Martin (2002). Understanding Morphology. Arnold, London.

Haspelmath, Martin (2011). The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica, 45(1), 31-80.

Hay, Jennifer (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics, 39,1041-1070.

Hay, Jennifer and Baayen, R. Harald (2002). Parsing and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 203-235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Hay, Jennifer and Baayen, R. Harald (2006). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 342-348.

Herrity, Peter (2000). Slovene. Routledge, London.

Hewitt, B. G. (1995). Georgian: A Structural Reference Grammar. London Oriental and African Languages Library. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Hjelmslev, Louis (1948). Structural analysis of language. In Essais linguistiques, pp. 27-35. Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.

Hockett, Charles F. (1942). A system of descriptive phonology. Language, 18, 3-21. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 97-108.

Hockett, Charles F. (1947). Problems of morphemic analysis. Language, 23, 321-343. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 229-242.

Hockett, Charles F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10, 210-231. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 386-399.

Hockett, Charles F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. MacMillan, New York.

Hockett, Charles F. (1961). Linguistic elements and their relation. Language, 37, 29-53.

Hockett, Charles F. (1967). The Yawelmani basic verb. Language, 43, 208-222.

Hockett, Charles F. (1968). The State of the Art. Mouton, The Hague.

Hockett, Charles F. (ed.) (1970). A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Hockett, Charles F. (1987). Refurbishing our Foundations: Elementary Linguistics from an Advanced Point of View. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Hornstein, Norbert and Lightfoot, David (1981). Explanation in Linguistics. Longman, London.

Ingria, Robert J. (1990). The limits of unification. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, pp. 194-204.

Itkonen, Esa (2005). Analogy As Structure And Process: Approaches in Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy of Science. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. Johnson, David and Lappin, Shalom (1999). Local Constraints vs Economy. CSLI, Stanford.

Jones, Daniel (1929). Definition of a phoneme. Le Maitre Phonetique, 28, 43-44. Joos, Martin (ed.) (1957). Readings in Linguistics I. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Kaplan, Ronald M. and Bresnan, Joan (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (ed. J. Bresnan), pp. 173-281. MIT Press, Cambridge. Karlsson, Fred (1999). Finnish: An Essential Grammar. Routledge, London. Karlsson, Fred (2006). Finnish as an agglutinating language. In Elsevier Encylope- dia of Language & Linguistics (2nd edn.) (ed. K. Brown), pp. 476-480. Elsevier. Karttunen, Lauri (2003). Computing with realizational morphology. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (ed. A. Gelbukh), Proceedings of CICLing 2003, pp. 203-214. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

Karttunen, Lauri (2006). The insufficiency of paper-and-pencil linguistics: The case of Finnish prosody. In Intelligent Architectures: Variations on Themes by Ronald M. Kaplan (eds. M. Butt, M. Dalrymple, and T. Holloway King). CSLI.

Kemps, Rachel J. J. K., Ernestus, Mirjam, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 430-446.

Kiparsky, Paul (1975). What are phonological theories about. In Testing Linguistic Hypotheses (eds. D. Cohen and J. R. Wirth). Wiley, New York.

Kopke, Klaus-Michael (1988). Schemas in German plural formation. Lingua, 74,


KostiC, Aleksandar (1991). Informational approach to processing inflectional morphology: Standard data reconsidered. Psychological research, 53, 62-70. Kostic, Aleksandar (1995). Informational load constraints on processing inflectional morphology. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (ed. L. B. Feldman), pp. 317-344. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Kostic, Aleksandar, Markovic, Tanja, and Baucal, Aleksandar (2003). Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative domains? In Morphological Structure in Language Processing (eds. R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder), pp. 1-44. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Kurumada, Chigusa, Meylan, Stephan C., and Frank, Michael C. (2013). Zipfian frequency distributions facilitate word segmentation in context. Cognition, 127,


Kurylowicz, Jerzy (1949). La nature des proces dits “analogiques”. Acta Linguistica, 5, 121-138. Reprinted in Hamp et al. (1966), 158-174. [English translation with introduction by Margaret Winters (1995), The nature of the so-called analogical processes, Diachronica 12113-45.].

Kuryiowicz, Jerzy (1964). The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Carl Winter, Heidelberg.

Laaha, Sabine, Ravind, Dorit, Korecky-Kroll, Katharina, Laaha, Gregor, and Dressler, Wolfgang U. (2006). Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default? Journal of Child Language, 33, 271-302.

Law, Vivien (1998). The Techne and grammar in the Roman world. In Dionysius Thrax and the Techne Grammatike (eds. V. Law and I. Sluiter), pp. 111-120. Nodus Publikationen, Munster.

Lazaridou, Angeliki, Marelli, Marco, Zamparelli, Roberto, and Baroni, Marco (2013). Compositional-ly derived representations of morphologically complex words in distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, East Stroudsburg, PA, pp. 1517-1526. ACL.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Levenshtein, Vladimir I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707-710.

Levin, Jules F., Haikalis, Peter D., and Forostenko, Anatole A. (1979). Reading Modern Russian. Slavica Publishers, Inc, Columbus.

Levy, Roger (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126-1177.

Lieb, Hans-Heinrich (1976). Grammars as theories: The case for axiomatic grammar (Part II). Theoretical Linguistics, 3,1-98.

Lieb, Hans-Heinrich (1980). Words as syntactic paradigms. In Wege zur Universalienforschung. Sprachwissenschaftliche Beitrage zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler (eds. G. Brettschneider and C. Lehmann), pp. 115-123. Narr, Tubingen.

Lieb, Hans-Heinrich (1983). Integrational Linguistics. Volume 1: General Outline. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Lieb, Hans-Heinrich (1992). Paradigma und Klassifikation: Explikation des Paradigmenbegriffs. Zeitschrift ftir Sprachwissenschaft, 11, 3-46.

Lieb, Hans-Heinrich (2005). Notions of paradigm in grammar. In Lexikologie / Lexicology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wortern und Wortschatzen / An international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies (eds. D. A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job, and P. Lutzeier), Volume 2, pp. 1613-1646. de Gruyter.

Lieb, Hans-Heinrich (2013). Towards a General Theory of Word Formation: The Process Model. Freie Universitat Berlin. Open Access Publication.

Lieber, Rochelle (1992). Deconstructing Morphology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Liljencrants, Johan and Lindblom, Bjorn (1972). Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language, 48, 839-862.

Lounsbury, Floyd (1953). Oneida Verb Morphology. Yale University Publications in Anthropology 48. Yale University Press, New Haven. Chapter 1 reprinted in Joos (1957), 379-385.

Luis, Ana and Spencer, Andrew (2005). A paradigm function account of ‘mesoclisis’ in European Portuguese. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 177-228. Springer, Dordrecht.

Lyons, John (1963). Structural Semantics. Blackwell, Oxford.

Macdonnell, Arthur A. (1927). A Sanskrit Grammar for Students (3rd edn.). Oxford University Press, London.

Maiden, Martin (2005). Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 137-175. Springer, Dordrecht.

Marantz, Alec (2013). No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 905-916.

Marchand, Hans (1960). The Categories and Types of present-day English Word- Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. University of Alabama Press.

Marcus, Gary F., Brinkmann, Ursula, Clahsen, Harald, Wiese, Richard, and Pinker, Steven (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29,189-256.

Marelli, Marco and Baroni, Marco (2015). Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Pscychological Review, 122(3), 485-515.

Marslen-Wilson, William and Tyler, Lorraine K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8,1-71.

Marslen-Wilson, William D. and Welsh, Alan (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.

Marzi, Claudia, Ferro, Marcello, and Pirrelli, Vito (2014). Morphological structure through lexical parsability. Lingue e linguaggio, XIII(2), 263-290.

Matthews, Peter H. (1965). The inflectional component of a word-and-paradigm grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 1,139-171.

Matthews, Peter H. (1972). Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Matthews, Peter H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Matthews, Peter H. (1993). Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Matthews, Peter H. (1994). Greek and Latin linguistics. In History of Linguistics II: Classical and Medieval Linguistics (ed. L. Guilio), pp. 1-133. Longman, London.

Matthews, Peter H. (2002). What can we conclude? In Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (eds. R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald), pp. 266-281. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Mayerthaler, Willi (1981). Morphologische Nattirlichkeit. Akademische

Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion, Wiesbaden.

McDonald, Scott A. and Ramscar, Michael (2001). Testing the distributional hypothesis: The influence of context on judgements of semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,

pp. 611-616.

Milin, Petar, Filipovic Durdevic, Dusica, and Moscoso del Prado Martin, Fermin (2009a). The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 50-64.

Milin, Petar, Kuperman, Victor, Kostic, Aleksandar, and Baayen, R. Harald (2009b). Words and paradigms bit by bit: An information-theoretic approach to the processing of inflection and derivation. In Blevins and Blevins (2009), pp. 214-253.

Morpurgo Davies, Anna (1978). Analogy, segmentation and the early Neogrammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society, 76, 36-60.

Morpurgo Davies, Anna (1998). Nineteenth-century linguistics. Volume IV. Longman.

Moscoso del Prado Martin, Fermin (2003). Paradigmatic Structures in Morphological Processing: Computational and Cross-linguistic Studies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen.

Moscoso del Prado Martin, Fermin, Bertram, Raymond, Haikio, Tuomo, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2004a). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30,1271-1278.

Moscoso del Prado Martin, Fermin, Kostic, Aleksandar, and Baayen, R. Harald (2004b). Putting the bits together: An information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94,1-18.

Mulder, Komberley, Dijkstra, Teun, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2014). Effects of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 72,59-84.

Muller, Gereon (2002). Remarks on nominal inflection in German. In More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich (eds. I. Kaufmann and B. Stiebels), Studia Grammatica 53, pp. 113-146. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

Muller, Gereon (2004). Inflectional classes and economy. In Explorations in Nominal Inflection (eds. G. Muller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zinfounun), pp. 189-228. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Murk, Harri William (1997). A Handbook of Estonian: Nouns, Adjectives and Verbs. Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series, v. 163. Indiana University, Bloomington.

Neef, Martin (1998). Reduced syllable plural in German. In Models of Inflection (eds. R. Fabri, A. Ortmann, and T. Parodi), pp. 244-265. Niemeyer, Tubingen.

Nida, Eugene A. (1948). The analysis of grammatical constituents. Language, 24, 168-177.

Nida, Eugene A. (1949). Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

Norris, Dennis, McQueen, James M., Cutler, Anne, and Butterfield, Sally (1997). The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 191-243.

Noyer, Rolf (1992). Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

Nyman, Martti (1986). Is the Paradigm Economy Principle relevant?. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 251-267.

Nyman, Martti (1988). Paradigm economy: A rejoinder to Carstairs. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 501-513.

O’Grady, William and Dobrovolsky, Michael (1996). Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction. Copp Clark Ltd, Toronto.

Paul, Hermann (1920). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Max Niemayer Verlag, Tubingen.

Penke, Martina, Krause, Marion, and Janfien, Ulrike (1999). The representation of inflectional morphology: Evidence from Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 68, 225-232.

Perlmutter, David M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Perlmutter, David M. (1988). The split morphology hypothesis: Evidence from Yiddish. In Theoretical Morphology (eds. M. Hammond and M. Noonan), pp. 79-100. Academic Press, San Diego.

Pertsova, Katya (2004). Distribution of genitive plural allomorphs in the Russian lexicon and in the internal grammar of native speakers. Master’s thesis, UCLA.

Pihel, Kalju and Pikamae, Arno (eds.) (1999). Soome-eesti sonaraamat. Valgus, Tallinn.

Pike, Kenneth L. (1943). Taxemes and immediate constituents. Language, 19, 65-82.

Pike, Kenneth L. (1967). Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Human Behaviour. Mouton, The Hague.

Pirrelli, Vito, Ferro, Marcello, and Calderone, Basilio (2011). Learning paradigms in time and space. In Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, pp. 135-157. Oxford University Press.

Pirrelli, Vito, Ferro, Marcello, and Marzi, Claudia (2015). Computational complexity of abstractive morphology. In Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity (eds. M. Baerman, D. Brown, and G. G. Corbett), pp. 141-166. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Plag, Ingo (2010). Compound stress assignment by analogy: The constituent family bias. Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft, 29.

Plag, Ingo, Homann, Julia, and Kunter, Gero (2016). Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics, 52(4), (in press).

Plank, Franz (ed.) (1991). Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Plunkett, Kim and Marchman, Virginia (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21-69.

Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan A. (1987). Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. CSLI, Stanford.

Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan A. (1994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press, Stanford.

Pounder, Amanda (2000). Processes and Paradigms in Word-formation Morphology. Trends in Linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Scholtz, Barbara (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19, 8-50.

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Zwicky, Arnold (1992). A misconceived approach to morphology. In The Proceedings of The Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (ed. D. Bates), pp. 387-398. Stanford Linguistics Association: CSLI.

Ramscar, Michael (2013). Suffixing, prefixing, and the functional order of regularities in meaningful strings. Psihologija, 46(4), 377-396.

Ramscar, Michael and Dye, Melody (2010). Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 1-40.

Ramscar, Michael, Dye, Melody, and McCauley, Stewart M. (2013a). Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language, 89(4), 760-793.

Ramscar, Michael, Hendrix, Peter, Love, Brad, and Baayen, R. Harald (2013b). Learning is not decline: The mental lexicon as a window into cognition across the lifespan. The Mental Lexicon, 3, 450-481.

Ramscar, Michael and Port, Robert F. (2015). Categorization (without categories). In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (ed. E. Dbrowska and D. Divak). Mouton de Gruyter, 75-99.

Ramscar, Michael and Port, Robert F. (2016). How spoken languages work in the absence of an inventory of discrete units. Language Sciences, 53, Part A, 58-74.

Ramscar, Michael and Yarlett, Daniel (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognititive Science, 31, 927-960.

Ramscar, Michael, Yarlett, Daniel, Dye, Melody, Denny, Katie, and Thorpe, Kirsten (2010). The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognititive Science, 34, 909-957.

Rescorla, Robert A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151-160.

Rescorla, Robert A. and Wagner, Allan R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Classical Conditioning II (eds. A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy), pp. 64-99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

Rettig, Wolfgang (1972). Sprachsystem und Sprachnorm in der deutschen Substantivflexion. Narr, Tubingen.

Rissanen, Jorma (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14(5),


Roark, Brian and Sproat, Richard (2007). Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford University Press.

Robins, Robert H. (1959). In defence of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society, 58, 116-144. Reprinted in Transactions of the Philological Society 99, 2001, 116-144.

Robins, Robert H. (1989). General Linguistics (fourth edn.). Longman, London.

Robins, Robert H. (1997). A Short History ofLinguistics. Longman, London.

Rumelhart, David E. and McClelland, James L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the

Microstructures of Cognition (eds. D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group), Volume 2, pp. 216-271. MIT Press.

Saagpakk, Paul F. (2000). Estonian-English Dictionary (third edn.). Koolibri, Tallinn.

Sackman, Robin (2000). Numeratives in Mandarin Chinese. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes (eds. P. M. Vogel and B. Comrie), Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 23, pp. 421-477. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Sadler, Louisa and Spencer, Andrew (1998). Morphology and argument structure. In Handbook of Morphology (eds. A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky), pp. 206-236. Blackwell.

Sagot, Benoit and Walther, Geraldine (2013). Implementing a formal model of inflectional morphology. In Proceedings of SFCM 2013, Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 115-134. Springer, Berlin.

Sampson, Geoffrey R. (1989). Language acquisition: Growth or learning. Philosophical Papers, 203-240.

Sapir, Edward (1921). Language. Harcourt Brace, New York.

Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916). Cours de linguistique generale (Critical edition edited by Tuillo de Mauro, 2005.). Payot, Paris.

Saussure, Ferdinand de (1959). Cours de linguistique generale. Philosophical Press, New York. Translated by Wade Baskin.

Schiering, Rene, Bickel, Balthasar, and Hildebrandt, Kristine A. (2010). The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics, 46,


Schreuder, Robert and Baayen, R. Harald (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37,118-139.

Seiler, Hansjakob (1965). On paradigmatic and syntagmatic similarity. Lingua, 18, 35-97.

Shannon, Claude (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.

Shieber, Stuart M. (1986). An Introduction to Unification-based Approaches to Grammar. CSLI, Stanford.

Singh, Rajendra and Starosta, Stanley (2003). Explorations in Seamless Morphology. SAGE Publications, London.

Skousen, Royal (1989). Analogical modeling of language. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Skousen, Royal (1992). Analogy and Structure. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Spencer, Andrew J. (1999). Transpositions and argument structure. In Yearbook of Morphology 1998 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 73-101. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Spencer, Andrew J. (2003). Putting some order into morphology: Reflections on Rice (2000) and Stump (2001). Journal of Linguistics, 39, 621-646.

Spencer, Andrew J. (2012). Identifying stems. Word Structure, 5, 88-108.

Spencer, Andrew J. (2013). Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-based Model. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Sproat, Richard S. (2008). Morphological evolution. 3rd Workshop on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics, Helsinki.

Stankiewicz, Edward (ed.) (1972). Selected Writings of Baudouin de Courtenay. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Steele, Susan (1995). Towards a theory of morphological information. Language, 71, 260-309.

Stemberger, Joseph Paul and MacWhinney, Brian (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition, 14,17-26.

Stewart, Tom and Stump, Gregory T. (2007). Paradigm function morphology and the morphology/syntax interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (eds. G. Ramschand and C. Reiss), pp. 383-421. Oxford University Press.

Stump, Gregory T. (1993a). How peculiar is evaluative morphology? Journal of Linguistics, 29,1-36.

Stump, Gregory T. (1993b). On rules of referral. Language, 69(3), 449-479.

Stump, Gregory T. (1993c). Position classes and morphological theory. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992 (eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 129-180. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Stump, Gregory T. (1995). The uniformity of head marking in inflectional morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1994 (ed. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 245-249. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Stump, Gregory T. (2001). Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Stump, Gregory T. (2005a). Rules about paradigms. In Morphology and the Web of Grammar: Essays in Memory of Steven G. Lapointe (eds. C. O. Orgun and P. Sells), pp. 49-82. CSLI Publications.

Stump, Gregory T. (2005b). Some criticisms of Carstairs-McCarthy’s conclusions. Yearbook of Morphology, 2, 283-303.

Stump, Gregory T. (2006). Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language, 82(2),


Su, Xiaoqin (2011). Reflexivitat im Chinesischen. Eine integrative Analyse. Mit zwei Anhangen von Hans-Heinrich Lieb. Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt.

Taft, Marcus (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.

Timberlake, Alan (2004). A Reference Grammar of Russian. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Trudgill, Peter (2011). Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Tschenkeli, Kita (1958). Einfuhrung in die georgische Sprache. Amirani Verlag, Zurich.

Tuldava, Juhan (1994). Estonian Textbook. Volume 159, Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series. Indiana University, Bloomington.

Unbegaun, Boris (1957). Russian Grammar. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

van Jaarsveld, Henk J., Coolen, Riet, and Schreuder, Robert (1994). The role of analogy in the interpretation of novel compounds. Journal of Psychological Research, 23,111-137.

Viguier, Marie-Helene (2013). Tempussemantik : das franzosische Tempussystem. Eine integrative Analyse. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fur romanische Philologie, Band 366. De Gruyter, Berlin.

Viitso, Tiit-Rein (2003). Rise and development of the Estonian language. In Estonian Language (ed. M. Erelt), pp. 130-230. Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn.

Viks, Ulle (1992). Vaike vormi-sonastik: Sissejuhatus &grammatika. Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut, Tallinn.

Wade, Terrence (1992). A Comprehensive Russian Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford.

Weaver, Warren (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536-544.

Weaver, Warren (1955). Translation. In Machine Translation of Languages: Fourteen Essays (eds. W N. Locke and A. D. Booth), pp. 15-23. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Wells, Rulon S. (1947). Immediate constituents. Language, 23, 81-117.

Whitney, William Dwight (1885). The Roots, Verb-forms and Primary Derivatives of the Sanskrit Language. Breitkopf and Hartel, Leipzig. Reproduced as Vol. 30 of the American Oriental Series, New Haven: 1946.

Whitney, William Dwight (1889). Sanskrit Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Wiese, Richard (1996). The Phonology of German. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1921). Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Annalen der Naturphilosophische, XIV, 185-262.

Wunderlich, Dieter (1999). German noun plural reconsidered. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(6), 1044-1045.

Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (1984). Studien zur deutschen Lautstruktur. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

Zepeda, Ofelia (1983). A Papago Grammar. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

Zipf, George K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.

Zwicky, Arnold M. (1985). How to describe inflection. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (eds. M. Niepokuj, M. Van Clay, V. Nikiforidou, and D. Feder), pp. 372-386. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley.

< Prev   CONTENTS   Source

Related topics