Desktop version

Home arrow Language & Literature arrow New Frontiers in Technological Literacy: Breaking with the Past

References

Banks, F., Barlex, D., Jarvinen, E., O’Sullivan, G., Owen-Jackson, G., &Rutland, M. (2004). DEPTH—developing professional thinking for technology teachers: An international study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 141-157.

Barlex, D. (1995a). Nuffield Design and Technology study guide. London, UK: Longman.

Barlex, D. (1995b). Nuffield Design and Technology resource task file. London. England: Longman.

Barlex, D. (1995c). Nuffield Design and Technology teacher guide. London, UK: Longman.

Barlex, D. (1998). Design and technology: The Nuffield perspective in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 139-150.

Barlex, D. (2000). Nuffield Design and Technology teacher guide. London, UK: Longman.

Barlex, D. (2001). Young Foresight. New Media in Technology Education, PATT11 (Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology) Conference Proceedings, 2001, 31-33. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: University of Eindhoven.

Barlex, D. (2003). Considering the impact of design and technology on society—the experience of the Young Foresight Project. The Place of Design and Technology in the Curriculum, PATT13 (Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology) Conference Proceedings 2003, 140-144. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.

Barlex, D. (2004). Creativity in school technology education: A chorus of voices. Learning for Innovation in Technology Education, 3rd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research Proceedings, 2004, 24-37. Melbourne: Griffith University.

Barlex, D. (2006). Change of place. Retrieved from http://www.interactive.bis.gov .uk/foresight/TeachersGuide/Index.html.

Barlex, D. (2007). Assessing capability in design and technology: The case for a minimally invasive approach. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(2), 9-56.

Barlex, D., & Trebell, D. (2008). Design-without-make: Challenging the conventional approach to teaching and learning in a design and technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 119-138.

Barlex, D., & Welch, M. (2001). Educational research and curriculum development: The case for synergy. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 6(1), 29-39.

Bronowski, J. (1973). The ascent ofman. London, UK: British Broadcasting Corporation.

Department for Education. (2011). The Framework for the National Curriculum. A report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum review. London, UK: Department for Education.

Department for Education and Science and Welsh Office. (1988). National Curriculum Design and Technology Working Group INTERIM REPORT. London, UK: DES and Welsh Office.

Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16, 261-274.

Givens, N., &Barlex, D. (2001). The role of published materials in curriculum development and implementation for secondary school design and technology in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(2), 137-161.

Goldsmiths. (2009). E-scape portfolio assessment. Phase 3 report. Commissioned by the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta). London, UK: University of London. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://www .gold.ac.uk/media/e-scape_phase3_report.pdf.

Kimbell, R. (2004). Assessment in design and technology education for the Department of Education and Skills. In Learning for Innovation in Technology Education Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 99-112). Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University.

Kimbell, R. (2006). Innovative performance and virtual portfolios—a tale of two proj - ects. Design and Technology Education; An International Journal, 11(1), 18-30.

Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., & Kelly, V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design and technology. London, UK: School Examinations and Assessment Council.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Murphy, P., Lunn, S., Davidson, M., & Issitt, J. (2000). Young Foresight phase 1 evaluation report. Bucks, UK: Open University.

Murphy, P., Lunn, S., Davidson, M., & Issitt, J. (2001). Young Foresight summary evaluation report. Bucks, UK: Open University.

Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (2001). Realizing the potential—and lost opportunities— for peer collaboration in a D&T setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 203-237.

Ofsted. (2011). Meeting technological challenges? Design and technology in schools 2007-10. London, UK: Crown Copyright.

Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Schon, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13, 135-156.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >