Desktop version

Home arrow Computer Science arrow Designing Data-Intensive Applications. The Big Ideas Behind Reliable, Scalable and Maintainable Systems

Reduce-Side Joins and Grouping

We discussed joins in Chapter 2 in the context of data models and query languages, but we have not delved into how joins are actually implemented. It is time that we pick up that thread again.

In many datasets it is common for one record to have an association with another record: a foreign key in a relational model, a document reference in a document model, or an edge in a graph model. A join is necessary whenever you have some code that needs to access records on both sides of that association (both the record that holds the reference and the record being referenced). As discussed in Chapter 2, denormalization can reduce the need for joins but generally not remove it entirely/

In a database, if you execute a query that involves only a small number of records, the database will typically use an index to quickly locate the records of interest (see Chapter 3). If the query involves joins, it may require multiple index lookups. However, MapReduce has no concept of indexes—at least not in the usual sense.

When a MapReduce job is given a set of files as input, it reads the entire content of all of those files; a database would call this operation a full table scan. If you only want to read a small number of records, a full table scan is outrageously expensive compared to an index lookup. However, in analytic queries (see “Transaction Processing or Analytics?” on page 90) it is common to want to calculate aggregates over a large number of records. In this case, scanning the entire input might be quite a reasonable thing to do, especially if you can parallelize the processing across multiple machines.

v. The joins we talk about in this book are generally equi-joins, the most common type of join, in which a record is associated with other records that have an identical value in a particular field (such as an ID). Some databases support more general types of joins, for example using a less-than operator instead of an equality operator, but we do not have space to cover them here.

When we talk about joins in the context of batch processing, we mean resolving all occurrences of some association within a dataset. For example, we assume that a job is processing the data for all users simultaneously, not merely looking up the data for one particular user (which would be done far more efficiently with an index).

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source   Next >

Related topics