Arendell, T. (1997). Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: A woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology, 20(3), 341—367.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Connell, R. W (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crewe, B. (2005). Codes and conventions: The terms and conditions of contemporary inmate values. In A. Liebling & S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Cunliffe, A. (2003). Reflexive inquiryin organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56(8), 983—1003.
Drake, D. H., Earle, R., & Sloan, J. (2015). General introduction: What ethnography tells us about prisons and what prisons tell us about ethnography. In D. H. Drake, R. Earle, & J. Sloan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drake, D.H. and Harvey, J., 2014. Performing the role of ethnographer: processing and managing the emotional dimensions of prison research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(5), pp.489—501.
Gadd, D., & Jefferson, T. (2007). Psychosocial criminology: An introduction. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd.
Hsu, H.-F. (2005). The patterns of masculinity in prison sociology: A case study in one Taiwanese prison. Critical Criminology, 13, 1—16.
Jewkes, Y. (2005). Men behind bars: “Doing” masculinity as an adaptation to imprisonment. Men and Masculinities, 8, 44—63.
Jewkes, Y. (2012). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), 63—75.
King, R. D. (2000). Doing research in prisons. In R. D. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
King, R. D., & Liebling, A. (2008). Doing research in prisons. In R. D. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (2nd ed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Liebling, A. (1999). Doing research in prison: Breaking the silence. Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 147—173.
Liebling, A. (2001). Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prisons research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472—484.
Newton, C. (1994). Gender theory and prison sociology: Using theories of masculinities to interpret the sociology of prisons for men. The Howard Journal, 33(3), 193-202.
Phillips, C., & Earle, R. (2010). Reading difference differently? Identity, epistemology and prison ethnography. British Journal of Criminology, 50(2), 360-378.
Piacentini, L. (2007). Researching Russian prisons: a consideration of new and established methodologies in prison research. In Y. Jewkes (Ed.), Handbook on prisons. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Sabo, D., Kupers, T. A., & London, W (2001). Gender and the politics of punishment. In D. Sabo, T. A. Kupers, & W. London (Eds.), Prison masculinities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflectivepractitioner: Howprofessionals think in action. Aldershot, Brookfield USA, Singapore, Sydney: Ashgate.
Schwalbe, M., & Wolkomir, M. (2001). The masculine self as problem and resource in interview studies of men. Men and Masculinities, 4(1), 90-103.
Sykes, G. (1958). The society ofcaptives: A study ofa maximum securityprison (2007th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Warr, D. J. (2004). Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: Reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(4), 578—587.