Home Religion Religions and Migrations in the Black Sea Region
Religion in the ‘Here-There’ System of References
The Orthodox Romanians are the prominent group of people in the community. As depicted in the excerpt below, the Orthodox identity is constructed with reference to Adventism, whereas on the ethnicity axis there is a strong discursive distancing between being Roma and being Romanian. Even though there are no conflicts between these distinct groups, there are social borders that appear throughout. The use of semantic constructions such as us, Orthodox stands for meaningful religious delimitations that, when it comes to migration, are transposed into different practices and strategies. The distinctions are rooted in daily interactions and are maintained on a daily basis.19 These collective references appear in various contexts, especially when describing migration from the community: the Roma and the Adventists were the first to migrate, the Adventists helped potential migrants from the very beginning, the Adventists, unlike the Orthodox, are religious people in the sense that they follow religious teachings.
I: So, you’ve been working here in the commune for 15 years?
R: Yes, I work here.
I: And... approximately when did people start to migrate? R: After 1990.
I: After 1990?
R: They left. They left after 1990. Many. Many, meaning gypsies of Roma ethnicity and Adventists, and less our Orthodox. They left for...
I: But when did the Orthodox start to go abroad?
R: What do I know, I think that after ’96-’97, the ones who went. They started to. but there aren't many of us Orthodox, there aren't.
(Seaca Town hall secretary, woman, 50, Orthodox, no migration experience)
There are many Orthodox Romanians in the community for whom migration triggers references to Roma who leave for work without previous formal arrangements and to Adventists.20 This association is very interesting in terms of the visibility of the phenomenon and its factual effects at the origin: Roma typically invest the money earned abroad in opulent houses, and Adventist Romanians are more prone to getting involved in entrepreneurship and setting their own small businesses, usually in association with other Adventists. At the same time, the money gained through the temporary, contract-based migration of Orthodox Romanian women enters family budgets as a daily resource ensuring subsistence and covering routine expenses.
Migration is embedded in the religiosity equation as a process that results in transformations of people's behaviour and of their general attitude towards the church.21 Abroad, religious affiliation gains a discursive importance and is a relevant element in the construction of identities. It differentiates between natives, who are Catholic, and Romanian migrants, who are either Adventists or Orthodox. The changes in people's religious practices at the destination as compared to home are multi-layered. The logical consequence of the fact that migrants have very busy work schedules is their limited temporal resources to be allocated socially. As such, a response such as ‘I didn't have time for anything, so I never really went to church in Spain' is not uncommon among the Orthodox migrants. But, at the same time, their religious participation at the origin is scarce as well. It can be thus concluded that, for the Orthodox, religious participation in the destination community is correlated with their religious behaviour at home. There are cases in which non-Adventist migrants go to Adventist Romanian churches in order to receive support.22 The correlation of the frequency of church attendance in the two communities stands for the Adventists as well. In their case, the intensive religious participation is a norm at both the origin and the destination.
For the Orthodox and Adventists alike, the religious behaviour of individuals is linked to their work patterns and schedules, and the influence of migration in this respect is most visible in the case of the Orthodox. As the priest relates, migrants have gone from a place where holidays are not marked by the abandonment of daily chores, to one in which work programs are designed by keeping in mind these special days:
I: Do you think that their experience abroad made them less religious, I mean were they...
R: It got better, because abroad, for example in Spain, it’s clear when it’s a holiday. Over there, when it’s a holiday, everybody is resting. It’s not like here, in Romania, where everybody does what he wants to, because it’s democracy. And they came, especially the Roma, and they come here respectful, I look at them and I’m amazed, because they says: father, we follow, as we do over there, says, we were forced at first and now we respect the holidays. There, if there’s a break. from what I understand, every day from 2 PM until 3 PM, nobody does anything in the whole country. They respect Sundays, holidays. It’s a good thing for a man’s soul, because man is religious and it’s good for him to respect his holiday. Each with their belief, because in Spain they are mostly Catholics.
(Orthodox priest at the local church)
As shown in the above excerpt, migration leads to changes in behaviours—respecting the holidays and working on a clear schedule. However, no reference is made to intimate aspects concerning the way individuals relate to religious claims. This account is convergent with ones given by all the other migrants or former migrants in relation to work and the professional life in general: while working abroad is tough and you really have to do your best and to be very serious in the way you perform your job, things are structured and everyone has to follow the rules, the very same rules that are designed to help people.
The major moments of life, associated with special religious practices, are usually celebrated at home, in Romania: weddings, baptisms and funerals are all reasons for migrants to temporarily come back to their community of origin. This fact is ‘read’ by the Orthodox priest as an increase in the respect people have for the Church as an institution and a proof of the unbreakable ties migrants have with their homes.23
In the case of the Adventists, the religious identity is much more homogenous and consistent than in the case of the Orthodox. If the basis of self-definitions in religious terms in the community is a negation of
Adventism for the Orthodox majority, for the Adventist religious minority the construction of their own identity rests on the convergence of religious norms and teachings and the day-to-day behaviours of individuals. There is a certain model of the individual promoted by Adventism, with implications that go beyond the religious sphere way into the civic area. The sense of righteousness is not only a matter of religious participation, but it actually implies that one has to behave according to the religious norms in all instances of life. As Orthodox respondents explain, Adventists follow basic prescriptions on how to interact with others in their daily encounters with community members—they are always willing to help and they are known to be ‘serious’ and trustworthy. In the case of the Orthodox, religion’s explanatory power is rather low, with no patterns of interaction or moral choices characteristic for the group as a whole.
Adventists and Orthodox are often perceived by the latter as being antagonistic in what concerns their behaviour. In the community, it is a known fact that Adventists are stricter in their attitudes and their actions as compared to the Orthodox.24 Religion becomes a ground for constructing distinct social categories with distinct traits: while Adventists follow the religious norms and respect their own confession, the Orthodox often drift apart from religious teachings. The institutional element is a distinct part in the lives of the Orthodox, while in the case of Adventists there is a continuum that links the institutional and the day- to-day aspects of religion. This difference may be explained by turning to the statuses of the two religions within the country, as well as within the community: Adventists belong to a minority group and their religious affiliation is what sets them apart, while the Orthodox religious identity is considered the standard, or the norm. While Orthodoxy is something you are born into, Adventism stands on the manifestation of individual choice—one has to prove that she is following the religious teachings in every aspect of her life in order to maintain her place in the religious group:
R: By the way, the Adventists used to give you money only if they knew that you weren’t a smoker. If they knew you to be a smoker, they wouldn’t give you...
R2: Yes. Yes.
R: They were sworn enemies. [.]
R: they are. Of course...they are better than us, clearly. So, most of them are better than us. More educated, more.they got cultivated by studying the Bible.there are many teachings in the Bible. Those who don’t know, they are worse, colder. We get out of Church, start cursing, go into bodegas. Well, it’s not like that for them.
(M.C. and his wife, mid 50s, Orthodox, former migrants)
In the above excerpt, there are two ideas worth mentioning as they were encountered in many of the individuals’ narratives of migration and religious diversity. The Adventists offer their support to those in need, not limiting their interventions to fellow Adventists. But they only do so after a moral screening of the recipients according to their own religious teachings and standards of being a worthy and righteous person. This shows the deep-rootedness of religious teachings in Adventism, and the little room left for sin or moral uncertainties.
The religious affiliation of individuals has implications in what concerns their resources of integration in the destination communities. The fact that the Adventist religion requires the attendance of weekly meetings is not specific—it is characteristic for the Orthodox as well, but what distinguishes Adventists from Orthodox is individuals’ adherence to these norms. Apart from the Sabbath and its associated practices, there are activities in which Adventists are involved together, such as civic initiatives for helping those in need—regardless of their religious affiliation.25 At the destination, this is a factor that catalyses migrants’ adaptation as they get to know people with more extensive experience in Spain and can thus receive tips and advice on what to do in order to find a job, a place to live and so on. One factual example of the existence of social support initiatives comes from the origin community: in Seaca, the Adventist Church offers help to people in need in the form of housing, food and money.26 As mentioned previously, this activity is paralleled by the existence of Adventist Churches or gathering places in Spain, which are known resources for Romanian migrants in need. There, they receive support for integration and help with finding jobs and accommodation and gaining access to information. In the destination country, through participating in church-related activities, such as Bible studies, individuals interact with fellow Romanians and develop relationships that enhance their feelings of belonging. Ultimately, relocating to Spain is made easier by these support networks.
This case study contributes to the explorations of religions and migration in the Black Sea region by discussing how (religious) identities are attributed and defined in a multi-religious community. In the context of Seaca’s religious and ethnic dualisms, religious affiliation is a resource for identity construction especially in the case of the Romanian Orthodox. At the same time, having experienced migration is a characteristic that differentiates individuals, along with religion and ethnicity. Further on, the group identity of Orthodox Romanians is constructed through recurring references to the others, the Roma and the Adventists. For the non-migrants in the community, announcing migration as the topic of the research and as the conversation theme triggers the proclamation of the state of facts in the community: many Adventists and many Roma are now in Spain.
There is a two-way relation between religion and migration, and a dual stream of influences that link them. Religion is an important variable for defining the social network on which emigration relies, whereas migration changes the way that Orthodox Christians engage in religious practices and their attitude and behaviour related to the Church as an institution and to religious constrictions on work schedules. Thus, while the Adventist Church is a catalyst for migration and adaptation in the host country and its influence on the followers is constant, both at the origin and at the destination, the Orthodox Church sees individual changes traced back to migration in the daily routines of its followers. Without having explored the subject in the empirical research, we expect the effects of migration on religious participation in the case of Orthodox to be stronger for older migrants.
The confessional life and the professional life of individuals are connected. Romania is associated with a lack of structure when it comes to working and getting paid—you don’t know what tomorrow will bring and you are in a constant state of thinking how to manage to get along. In Spain, things are different. Even though it might be rather difficult to find work as an immigrant, once you become employed you know exactly what is expected of you and how you should do your job. In this context, it is also claimed that Orthodox migrants borrow from the Catholic natives a sense of discipline when it comes to their religious behaviour and the importance of religious practices and norms in their lives. In this sense, the findings reiterate Vertovec’s (2000) and Yang and Ebaugh’s (2001a) discussions on the fact that departure from the homeland transforms religious practices, with the amendment that the change is perceived at the origin, upon returning, and doesn’t refer to the religious behaviours of migrants at the destination. However, it is often the case for the Orthodox to have minimal involvement in community religious practices, especially if they are in the active years of their lives.
The Adventists are seen as somehow more worthy than the Orthodox by the latter themselves. In this respect, the Adventist group or the Adventist minority is described as being different regarding the religious behaviour displayed by individuals and the place occupied by religion in people’s lives. An example is that, for the Orthodox, religion is community based, or, better put, it is origin based. Temporary return home for major celebrations, such as weddings or baptisms, is a fact that can be interpreted at the conjunction of religious practices and the social embeddedness of the Church. Nevertheless, there are no direct accounts of how the Orthodox are but only of how the Adventists are different from us, the Orthodox. In that, the constant reference to the Adventist other is a resource for constructing the Orthodox identity.
This community provides an example of both identity construction through the use of opposites and the field of interdependence when it comes to religion and migration. Not a linear relation, but a wide array of nuances governs the everyday life link between the two concepts.
Acknowledgements This chapter was supported by the CNCS-UEFISCDI grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0210.
Adventists and only a few Romanians) work in the domestic sector (women) and constructions (men).
Barth, Fredrik, ed. 1998. Ethnic Groups andBoundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Chiriac, Marian. 2005. Provocarile diversitatii. Politici publice privind minoritatile nationale si religioase in Romdnia [Diversity’s Challenges. Public Policies on National and Religious Minorities in Romania]. Cluj Napoca: Centrul de Resurse pentru Diversitate Etnoculturala.
Ebaugh, Helen Rose, and Janet Saltzman Chafetz, eds. 2002. Transnational Immigrant Networks. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Kurien, Prema. 2001. Religion, Ethnicity and Politics: Hindu and Muslim Indian Immigrants in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24(2): 263-293.
Levitt, Peggy. 2003. “You Know, Abraham was Really the First Immigrant”: Religion and Transnational Migration. International Migration Review 37(3)): 847-873.
Sandu, Dumitru. 2000. Migratia transnati onala a romanilor din perspectiva unui recensamant comunitar [The Transnational Migration of Romanians from the Perspective of a Community Census]. Sociologie Romdneasca 3(4): 5-52.
romdnesti in Spania [The Dynamics of International Migration: An Exercise on Romanian Migration to Spain]. Iasi: Lumen.
Serban, Monica, and Vlad Grigoras. 2000. Dogenii din Teleorman in tara si in straina tate. Un studiu asupra migratiei circulatorii in Spania [The Dogeni from Teleorman at Home and Abroad. A Study on Circulatory Migration to Spain]. Sociologie Romdneasca 2: 30-54.
Verdery, Katherine. 1996. The “Etatization” of Time in Ceaujescu’s Romania. What was Socialism, and what Comes Next 39-57.
Vertovec, Steven. 2000. Religion and Diaspora. Paper presented at the conference on ‘New Landscapes of Religion in the Wesf, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, September 27-29.
Yang, Fenggang, and Helen Rose Ebaugh. 2001a. Transformations in New Immigrant Religions and Their Global Implications. American Sociological Review 66(2): 269-288.
-. 2001b. Religion and Ethnicity Among New Immigrants: The Impact of
Majority/Minority Status in Home and Host Countries. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40(3): 367-378.
|< Prev||CONTENTS||Next >|