Desktop version

Home arrow History arrow A Minimalist View on the Syntax–Semantics Relationship: Turning the Mind into a Snowflake

Bibliography

Abels, K. (2003). ‘Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality, and Adposition Stranding’. PhD thesis. University of Connecticut.

- (2012). Phases. An essay on cyclicity in syntax, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Abels, K. and K. Bentzen (2009). ‘A note on the punctuated nature of movement paths’. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8, 19-40.

- (2012). Are Movement Paths Punctuated or Uniform?’ In: A. Alexiadou, T. Kiss, and G. Muller (eds.), Local Modelling of Non-Local Dependencies in Syntax. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, 431-452.

Abels, K. and L. Marti (2010). ‘A unified approach to split scope’. Natural Language Semantics 18.4, 435-470.

- (2012). ‘Propositions or Choice Functions: What do Quantifiers Quantify Over?’ In: Z. Belk, H. Constantinou, and M. Varkanitsa (eds.), UCL Working Papers in Linguistics N0 24. London: UCL, 45-74.

Adger, D. (2010). ‘A Minimalist theory of feature structure’. In: A. Kibort and G. G. Corbett (eds.), Features: Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185-220.

  • - (2013). A Syntax of Substance, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (2016). ‘A labelling solution to a curious EPP effect’, url: http://ling.auf.net/ lingbuzz/002965. Ms., Queen Mary University of London.

Adger, D. and P. Svenonius (2011). ‘Features in Minimalist Syntax. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-51.

Ajdukiewicz, K. (1936). ‘Die syntaktische Konnexitat’. Studia Philosophica 1, 1-27.

Anderson, C. A. (2001). Alternative (1*): A Criterion of Identity for Intensional Entities’. In: A. Church, C. A. Anderson, and M. ZeRny (eds.), Logic, Meaning, and Computation: Essays in Memory of Alonzo Church. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 393-427.

Antonelli, G. A. (2000). ‘Proto-Semantics for Positive Free Logic’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29.3, 277-294.

Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

- (1997). ‘Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In: L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 73-137.

Baltin, M. (2011). ‘The copy theory of movement and the binding-theoretic status of A-traces: You can’t get there from here’. In: J. Wood and N. Myler (eds.), NYU Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 3. New York University, 1-28.

Barrie, M. and E. Mathieu (2014). ‘Head movement’. In: A. Carnie, Y. Sato, and D. Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Syntax. New York-London: Routledge, 133-149.

Belardinelli, F. (2006). ‘Quantified Modal Logic and the Ontology of Physical Objects’. PhD thesis. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.

- (2007). ‘Counterpart Semantics for Quantified Modal Logic’. In: O. Tomala and R. Honzik (eds.), Logica Yearbook 2006. Praha: Filosofia, 11-21.

Belletti, A. (2004). ‘Aspects of the Low IP Area. In: L. Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 16-51. Reprinted in Belletti (2009: 161-191).

  • - (2005). ‘Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus 17.1, 1-35. Reprinted in Belletti (2009: 201-223).
  • - (2009). Structures and Strategies, New York-London: Routledge.

Belnap, N. D. and T. Muller (2014a). ‘BH-CIFOL: Case-Intensional First Order Logic’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43.5, 835-866.

- (2014b). ‘CIFOL: Case-Intensional First Order Logic: (I) Toward a Theory of Sorts’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43.2-3, 393-437.

Belnap, N. (2014). ‘Internalizing Case-Relative Truth in CIFOL+. In: T. Muller (ed.), Nuel Belnap on Indeterminism and Free Action. Berlin: Springer, 57-74.

Bencivenga, E. (1986). ‘Free Logics. In: D. Gabbay and F. Guenther (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume III: Alternatives in Classical Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel, 373-426.

- (2002). ‘Free Logics. In: D. Gabbay and F. Guenther (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume V. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 147-196.

Benthem, J. v., N. Bezhanishvili, and W. H. Holliday (2016). ‘A bimodal perspective on possibility semantics. Journal of Logic and Computation. doi: 10.1093/log- com/exw024. url: http://logcom.oxfordj ournals.org/content/early/2016/08/18/ logcom.exw024.abstract.

Berwick, R. C. and N. Chomsky (2016). Why Only Us: Language and Evolution, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Biskup, P. (2014). ‘For, zu and Feature Inheritance. In: A. Assmann et al. (eds.), Topics at InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 92. Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig: Institut fur Linguistik, 423-439.

Blumel, A. (2012). ‘Successive Cyclic Movement as Recursive Symmetry-Breaking. In: Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics.

N. Arnett and R. Bennett (eds.). Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press, 87-97.

Boeckx, C. (2001). ‘Scope reconstruction and A-movement’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19.3, 503-548. Reprinted in Boeckx (2008a: 185-214).

  • - (2008a). Aspects of the Syntax of Agreement, New York-London: Routledge.
  • - (2008b). Bare Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - (2008c). Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • - (2010a). ‘A tale of two minimalisms: Reflections on the plausibility of crashproof syntax, and its free-merge alternative’. In: M. T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105-124.
  • - (2010b). ‘Why edges are needed’. In: A. M. D. Sciullo and V. Hill (eds.), Edges, Heads, and Projections. Interface properties. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11-22.
  • - (2011a). ‘Approaching Parameters from Below’. In: A. M. D. Sciullo and C. Boeckx (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205-221.
  • - (2011b). ‘Some Reflections on Darwin’s Problem in the Context of Cartesian Biolinguistics. In: A. M. D. Sciullo and C. Boeckx (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 42-64.
  • - (2011c). ‘The Emergence of Language, from a Biolinguistic Point of View’. In: M. Tallerman and K. R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 492-501.
  • - (2012a). ‘A missing design perspective in I-linguistics. In: S. Ojima et al. (eds.), Future trends in the biology of language. Tokyo: Keio University, 95-116.
  • - (2012b). Syntactic Islands, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • - (2012c). ‘The I-language mosaic. In: C. Boeckx, M. del Carmen Horno-Cheliz, and J.-L. Mendivil-Giro (eds.), Language from a biological point of view: Current issues in Biolinguistics. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 23-51.
  • - (2015a). Elementary Syntactic Structures : Prospects of a Feature-Free Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • - (2015b). ‘Un-Cartesian (Bio-)linguistics?’ teorema 34.1, 161-186.

Boeckx, C. and S. Stjepanovic (2001). ‘Head-ing toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry 32.2, 345-355.

Borer, H. (2004). ‘The Grammar Machine’. In: A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopou- lou, and M. Everaert (eds.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 288-331.

  • - (2005a). Structuring Sense Volume I: In Name Only, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - (2005b). Structuring Sense Volume II: The Normal Course of Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - (2013a). Structuring Sense Volume III: Taking Form, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - (2013b). ‘The syntactic domain of Content. In: M. Becker, J. Grinstead, and J. Rothman (eds.), Generative Linguistics and Acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 205-248.

Boskovic, 2. (1994). ‘D-Structure, Theta Criterion, and movement into theta positions’. Linguistic Analysis 24, 247-286.

  • - (2002). ‘A-movement and the EPP’ Syntax 5.3, 167-218.
  • - (2007). ‘On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory’. Linguistic Inquiry 38.4, 589-644.
  • - (2016). ‘On the timing of labeling: Deducing Comp-trace effects, the Subject Condition, the Adjunct Condition, and tucking in from labeling. The Linguistic Review 33, 17-66.
  • - (To appear). ‘What is sent to spell-out is phases, not phasal complements. To appear, Linguistica 2017.

Boskovic, 2. and D. Takahashi (1998). ‘Scrambling and Last Resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29.3, 347-366.

Bostock, D. (1997). Intermediate Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bourbaki, N. (1954). Theorie des ensembles, Paris: Hermann & Cie.

- (1970). Theorie des ensembles, Paris: Masson diffusion C.C.L.S.

Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive

Commitment, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Branigan, P. (2016). ‘Multiple Feature Inheritance and the phase structure of the left periphery’ Ms., Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Brauner, T. and S. Ghilardi (2006). ‘First-Order Modal Logic. In: P. Blackburn, J. van Benthem, and F. Wolter (eds.), Handbook of Modal Logic. New York: Elsevier, 549-620.

Bressan, A. (1972). A General Interpreted Modal Calculus, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Brower, J. E. (2016). ‘Aristotelian Vs. Contemporary Perspectives on Relations’. In: A. Marmodoro and D. Yates (eds.), The Metaphysics of Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 36-54.

Carlson, G. N. (1977a). ‘A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural’. Linguistics and Philosophy 1.3, 413-456.

- (1977b). ‘Reference to Kinds in English’. PhD thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Carnap, R. (1934). Logische Syntax der Sprache, Berlin: Springer.

  • - (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language, Translated by Amethe Smeaton, Countess von Zeppelin. London: Kegan Paul Trench, Trubner & Co.
  • - (1943). Formalization of Logic, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (1947). Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • - (1948). Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (1963). ‘My Philosophical Development’. In: P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company, 3-84.

Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind. Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carstens, V., N. Hornstein, and T. D. Seely (2016). ‘Head-head relations in Problems of projection . The Linguistic Review 33, 67-86.

Chomsky, N. (1955-56). ‘The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory’. Ms., MIT.

  • - (1956). ‘Three models for the description of language’. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2, 113-124.
  • - (1957). Syntactic Structures, The Hague: Mouton.
  • - (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (1975a). Questions of Form and Interpretation, Amsterdam: The Peter De Ridder Press.
  • - (1975b). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, New York: Plenum Press.
  • - (1976). ‘Problems and Mysteries in the Study of Human Language’. In: A. Kasher (ed.), Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods, and Systems. Essays in Memory of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Dordrecht: Reidel, 281-357.
  • - (1980). Rules and representations, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • - (1981a). Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  • - (1981b). ‘On the Representation of Form and Function’. The Linguistic Review 1, 3-40.
  • - (1986a). Barriers, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (1986b). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • - (1991). ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’. In: R. Frei- din (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 417-454. Reprinted in Chomsky (1995: 129-166).
  • - (1993). ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In: K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1-52.
  • - (1995). The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (2000a). ‘Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework’. In: R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 89-156.
  • - (2000b). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • - (2000c). The Architecture of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - (2001). ‘Derivation by Phase’ In: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1-52.
  • - (2002). On Nature and Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • - (2004a). ‘Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. In: A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104-131.

Chomsky, N. (2004b). The Generative Enterprise Revisited. Discussions with Riny Huybregts, Henk van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • - (2005). ‘Three Factors in Language Design’ Linguistic Inquiry 36.1, 1-22.
  • - (2007). Approaching UG from Below’ In: U. Sauerland and H.-M. Gartner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1-29.
  • - (2008). ‘On Phases’ In: R. Freidin, C. Otero, and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Verg- naud. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 133-167.
  • - (2009). ‘Opening Remarks’ In: M. Piattelli-Palmarini, J. Uriagereka, and P. S. Etxeberria (eds.), Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13-43.
  • - (2010). ‘Some simple evo devo theses: how true might they be for language?’ In: R. K. Larson, V Deprez, and H. Yamakido (eds.), The Evolution of Human Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45-62.
  • - (2011). ‘Language and Other Cognitive Systems. What Is Special About Language?’ Language Learning and Development 7.4, 263-278.
  • - (2012a). ‘Foreword’. In: A. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 1-8.
  • - (2012b). The Science of Language. Interviews with James McGilvray, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • - (2013a). ‘Notes on denotation and denoting’. In: I. Caponigro and C. Cecchet- to (eds.), From Grammar to Meaning. The Spontaneous Logicality of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38-45.
  • - (2013b). ‘Poverty of the Stimulus: Willingness to be Puzzled. In: M. Piattelli- Palmarini and R. Berwick (eds.), Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61-67.
  • - (2013c). ‘Problems of Projection. Lingua 130, 33-49.
  • - (2014). ‘Minimal Recursion: Exploring the Prospects. In: T. Roeper and M. Speas (eds.), Recursion: Complexity in Cognition. Berlin: Springer, 1-15.
  • - (2015a). ‘A Discussion with Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi. Sophia Linguis- tica 64, 70-97.
  • - (2015b). ‘Problems of projection: Extensions. In: E. Di Domenico, C. Ha- mann, and S. Matteini (eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-16.
  • - (2015c). ‘Some Core Contested Concepts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
  • 44.1, 91-104.
  • - (2015d). ‘The Architecture of Language Reconsidered. Sophia Linguistica 64, 12-39.
  • - (2015e). The Minimalist Program. 20th Anniversary Edition, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (2016a). ‘Minimal Computation and the Architecture of Language’. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12, 13-24.
  • - (2016b). What Kind of Creatures Are We?, New York: Columbia University Press.

Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik (1993). ‘Principles and parameters theory’. In: A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: an International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 506-569. Reprinted in Chomsky (1995: 13-127).

Chung, S. and W. Ladusaw (2004). Restriction and Saturation, MIT Press.

- (2006). ‘Chamorro evidence for compositional asymmetry’. Natural Language Semantics 14 (4), 325-357.

Church, A. (1941). The Calculi Of Lambda-Conversion, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • - (1946). A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation (abstract)’. Journal of Symbolic Logic 11, 31.
  • - (1951). A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation’ In: P Henle, H. M. Kallen, and S. K. Langer (eds.), Structure, method and meaning: Essays in honor of Henry M. Sheffer. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 3-24.
  • - (1973). ‘Outline of a Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation (Part I)’. Nods 7.1, 24-33.
  • - (1974). ‘Outline of a Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation (Part II)’. Nods 8.2, 135-156.
  • - (1993). ‘A Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation. Alternative (1)’. Nods 27.2, 141-157.

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective, New York: Oxford University Press.

- (2010). The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Collins, C. (2002). ‘Eliminating Labels’. In: S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford: Blackwell, 42-64.

- (To appear 2017). ‘Merge (X, Y) = {X, Y}’. To appear in Leah Bauke and Andreas Blumel, eds., Labels and Roots, Walter De Gruyter.

Collins, C. and E. Stabler (2016). ‘A Formalization of Minimalist Syntax’. Syntax

19.1, 43-78.

Collins, J. (2007). ‘Syntax, More or Less’. Mind 116.464, 805-850.

- (2014). ‘Cutting It (Too) Fine. Philosophical Studies 169.2, 143-172.

Corsi, G. (2002). Counterpart Semantics: A Foundational Study on Quantified Modal Logics. Tech. rep. ILLC 2002 PP-2002-20. Amtsterdam: ILLC/Depart- ment of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam. url: http://www.ilc.uva.nl/ Publications/ResearchReports/PP-2002.text.pdf.

- (2003). ‘BF, CBF and Lewis Semantics’. Logique Et Analyse 46, 103-122.

Crain, S. (2012a). ‘Meaning in first language acquisition’. In: C. Maienborn,

K. von Heusinger, and P Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2724-2752.

- (2012b). The Emergence of Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creath, R. (2009). ‘The Gentle Strength of Tolerance: The Logical Syntax of Language and Carnap’s Philosophical Programme. In: P Wagner (ed.), Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 203-214.

- (2012). ‘Before Explication. In: P Wagner (ed.), Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 161-174.

Cresswell, M. J. (1990). Entities and Indices, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

- (2004). ‘Adequacy Conditions for Counterpart Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82.1, 28-41.

Davidson, D. (1967). ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences. In: N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 81-95. Reprinted in Davidson (1980: 105-122).

- (1980). Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Belder, M. and J. van Craenenbroeck (2015). ‘How to Merge a Root’ Linguistic Inquiry 46.4, 625-655.

Diesing, M. (1992a). ‘Bare Plural Subjects and the Derivation ofLogical Representations’. Linguistic Inquiry 23.3, 353-380.

- (1992b). Indefinites, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Dikken, M. den (2006). ‘A reappraisal of vP being phasal—a reply to Legate’ Ms., CUNY Graduate Center.

- (2009). ‘Arguments for successive-cyclic movement through SpecCP. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9, 89-126.

Donati, C. (2006). ‘On WH head movement’ In: L. Cheng and N. Corver (eds.), Wh-Movement moving on. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 21-46.

Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language, London: Harper & Row.

- (1991). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Eklund, M. (2009). ‘Carnap and Ontological Pluralism’. In: D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 130-56.

  • - (2013). ‘Carnap’s Metaontology’ Nods 47.2, 229-249.
  • - (2016). ‘Carnap’s Legacy for the Contemporary Metaontological Debate’ In: S. Blatti and S. Lapointe (eds.), Ontology after Carnap. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165-189.

Elbourne, P (2005). Situations and Individuals, MIT Press.

Embick, D. (2015). The Morpheme. A Theoretical Introduction, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Embick, D. and A. Marantz (2008). Architecture and Blocking’. Linguistic Inquiry

39.1, 1-53.

Embick, D. and R. Noyer (2007). ‘Distributed Morphology and the Syntax-Morphology Interface’. In: G. Ramchand and C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289-324.

Epstein, S. D., H. Kitahara, and T. D. Seely (2010). ‘Uninterpretable features: What are they and what do they do?’ In: M. T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring CrashProof Grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 125-142. Reprinted in Epstein, Kitahara, and Seely (2015a: 98-115).

  • - (2012). ‘Structure Building That Can’t Be’. In: M. Uribe-Etxebarria and V. Val- mala (eds.), Ways of Structure Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 253-270.
  • - (2015a). Explorations in Maximizing Syntactic Minimization, New York: Rout- ledge.
  • - (2015b). ‘From Aspects’ ‘Daughterless Mothers’ (aka Delta Nodes) to POP’s ‘Motherless Sets’ (aka Non-Projection): a Selective History of the Evolution of Simplest Merge’. In: Angel Gallego and D. Ott (eds.), 50 Years Later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL, 99-112. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics No 77.
  • - (2016). ‘Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads. The Linguistic Review 33, 87-102.

Epstein, S. D., A. Pires, and T. D. Seely (2005). ‘EPP in T: More Controversial Subjects’. Syntax 8.1, 65-80.

Epstein, S. D. and T. D. Seely (2002). ‘Rule Applications as Cycles in a Level-Free Syntax’. In: S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 65-89.

- (2006). Derivations in Minimalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Espanol-Echevarria, M. (2011). ‘On the Recursive Properties of Adjunction. Paper presented at the conference New Perspectives on Language Creativity: Composition and Recursion, Universite du Quebec, Montreal.

Fanselow, G. (2001). ‘Features, theta-roles, and free constituent order. Linguistic Inquiry 32.3, 405-437.

Fara, D. G. (2009). ‘Dear Haecceitism. Erkenntnis 70.3, 285-297.

Felser, C. (2004). ‘Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114.5, 543-574.

Feys, R. (1963). ‘Carnap on Modalities. In: P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company, 283-297.

Fine, K. (2000). ‘Neutral Relations. Philosophical Review 109.1, 1-33.

- (2007). ‘Response to Fraser MacBride’. Dialectica 61.1, 57-62.

Fitch, W. T., M. D. Hauser, and N. Chomsky (2005). ‘The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications’. Cognition 97.2, 179-210.

Fitting, M. (1991). ‘Modal logic should say more than it does’. In: J.-L. Lassez and G. Plotkin (eds.), Computational Logic, Essays in Honor of Alan Robinson. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 113-135.

- (2002). ‘Modal Logics Between Propositional and First-Order. Journal of Logic and Computation 12.6, 1017-1026.

Fitting, M. (2004). ‘First-order intensional logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 127, 171-1932.

- (2006). ‘FOIL Axiomatized’ Studia Logica 84.1, 1-22.

Fitting, M. and R. Mendelsohn (1998). First-Order Modal Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

F0llesdal, D. (1969). ‘Husserl’s Notion of Noema. Journal of Philosophy 66.20, 680-687.

- (1990). ‘Noema and Meaning in Husserl’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, 263-271.

Forbes, G. (1982). ‘Canonical Counterpart Theory. Analysis 42.1, 33-37.

  • - (1983). ‘More on Counterpart Theory’ Analysis 43.3, 149-152.
  • - (1987). ‘Free and Classical Counterparts: Response to Lewis. Analysis 47.3, 147-152.
  • - (1990). ‘Counterparts, Logic and Metaphysics: Reply to Ramachandran’ Analysis 50.3, 167-173.

Forster, T. (2007). ‘Implementing Mathematical Objects in Set Theory. Logique Et Analyse 50.197, 79-86.

Fortuny, J. (2008). The Emergence of Order in Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fox, D. (2002). ‘Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33.1, 63-96.

- (2003). ‘On Logical Form. In: R. Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell, 82-123.

Frampton, J. and S. Gutmann (2002). ‘Crash-Proof Syntax’ In: S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 90-105.

Franks, S. L. (2014). ‘Multiattachment syntax, “Movement” effects, and Spell- Out’. In: P. Kosta et al. (eds.), Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195-235.

Frege, G. (1964). Gottlob Frege: Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsatze. Zweite Au- flage. Mit E. Husserls und H. Scholz’ Anmerkungen herausgegeben von Ignacio Angelelli, Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.

  • - (1972). Gottlob Frege: Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. Translated and edited with a Biography and Introduction by Terrell Ward Bynum, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • - (1984). Gottlob Frege: Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Edited by Brian McGuinness, Oxford: Blackwell.

Freidin, R. (2012). Syntax. Basic Concepts and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fukui, N. (2015). ‘A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language’. In: Angel Gallego and D. Ott (eds.), 50 Years Later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL, 125-132. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics No 77.

Gabbay, D. and J. Moravcsik (1973). ‘Sameness and Individuation’. The Journal of Philosophy 70.16, 513-526.

Gallego, A. (2010). Phase Theory, John Benjamins.

  • - (2012). ‘Introduction: A framework of phases for linguistic theory’ In: A. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin-New York: Walter De Gruyter, 9-44.
  • - (2014). ‘Roots and Phases’. In: A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, and F. Schafer (eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 192-207.
  • - (2016). ‘Lexical Items and Feature Bundling. Consequences for Micro-parametric Approaches to Variation. In: L. Eguren, O. Fernandez-Soriano, and A. Mendikoetxea(eds.), Rethinking Parameters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 133-169.

Gartner, H.-M. (2002). Generalized Transformations and Beyond: Reflections on Minimalist Syntax, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Gaskin, R. and D. J. Hill (2012). ‘On Neutral Relations. Dialectica 66.1, 167-186.

Gazdar, G. (1981). ‘Unbounded Dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12.2, 155-184.

Goto, N. (2015a). ‘Labelability = Extractability: Its Theoretical Implications for the Free-Merge Hypothesis’. Paper presented at NELS 46, Concordia University, Montreal.

- (2015b). ‘On Labeling: In Search of Unconstrained Merge. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of The English Linguistic Society of Japan.

  • - (2015c). ‘On the Necessity of Labeling in Narrow Syntax: Exploring a Third Approach’. Paper presented at Keio Linguistics Colloquium, Keio University.
  • - (2016). ‘On Labeling Theory’ Paper presented at Kent Ridge Linguistics Col- loquia, National University of Singapore.

Grimshaw, J. (2005). Words and Structure, Stanford University: CSLI Publications.

Grohmann, K. (2003). Prolific Domains. On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

- (2011). ‘Anti-Locality: Too-Close Relations in Grammar’. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 260-290.

Guimaraes, M. (2000). ‘In defense of vacuous projections in bare phrase structure’. In: M. Guimaraes et al. (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics vol. 9. University of Maryland, 90-115.

Gupta, A. (1980). The Logic of Common Nouns, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harley, H. (2014). ‘On the Identity of Roots’. Theoretical Linguistics 40, 225-276.

Harrison-Trainor, M. (2016). ‘Worldizations of Possibility Models’. In: UC Berkeley Working Papers in Logic and the Methodology of Science. UC Berkeley. url: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v11r0dq.

Harvey, C. W. (1986). ‘Husserl’s Phenomenology and Possible Worlds Semantics: A Reexamination’. Husserl Studies 3.3, 191-207.

Harvey, C. W. and J. Hintikka (1991). ‘Modalization and Modalities’. In: T. M. See- bohm, D. F0llesdal, and J. N. Mohanty (eds.), Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences. Berlin-New York: Springer, 59-78.

Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch (2002). ‘The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?’ Science 298, 1569-1579.

Hazen, A. (1977). ‘The Foundations of Modal Logic’ PhD thesis. University of Pittsburgh.

- (1979). ‘Counterpart-Theoretic Semantics for Modal Logic’ Journal of Philosophy 76.6, 319-338.

Heck, R. and R. May (2013). ‘The Function is Unsaturated’. In: M. Beaney (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 825-850.

Heim, I. (2001). ‘Semantics and morphology of person and logophoricity’. Handout from a talk at the University of Tubingen.

Heim, I. and A. Kratzer (1998). Semantics in generative grammar, Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Heis, J. (2014). ‘The Priority Principle From Kant to Frege’. Nous 48.2, 268-297.

Henkin, L., J. Monk, and A. Tarski (1971). Cylindric Algebras, Part I, Amsterdam: North Holland.

- (1985). Cylindric Algebras, Part II, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hintikka, J. (1967). ‘Individuals, Possible Worlds, and Epistemic Logic’. Nous 1.1, 33-62.

  • - (1969a). Models for Modalities, Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • - (1969b). ‘Semantics for Propositional Attitudes’. In: J. Davis, D. J. Hockney, and W. Wilson (eds.), Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel, 21-45. Reprinted in Hintikka (1969a: 87-111).
  • - (1970a). ‘Objects of Knowledge and Belief: Acquaintances and Public Figures’. Journal of Philosophy 67.21, 869-883.
  • - (1970b). ‘The Semantics of Modal Notions and the Indeterminacy of Ontology’. Synthese 21.3-4, 408-424.
  • - (1975). The Intensions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities, Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • - (1981). ‘Phenomenology Vs. Possible-World Semantics: Apparent and Real Differences’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 35.1, 113.
  • - (1992). ‘Carnap’s work in the foundations of logic and mathematics in a historical perspective. Synthese 93.1, 167-189. Reprinted in Hintikka (1997: 191-213).
  • - (1997). Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • - (1998). ‘Perspectival Identification, Demonstratives and “Small Worlds”. Synthese 114.2, 203-232.

Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu (1995). ‘The Fallacies of the New Theory of Reference. Synthese 104.2, 245-283.

Hintikka, J. and J. Symons (2003). ‘Systems of Visual Identification in Neuroscience: Lessons From Epistemic Logic’. Philosophy of Science 70.1, 89-104.

Hinzen, W. (2006). Mind Design and Minimal Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- (2011a). ‘Emergence of a Systemic Semantics through Minimal and Underspecified Codes’. In: A. M. D. Sciullo and C. Boeckx (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 417-439.

  • - (2011b). ‘Language and Thought’. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 499-521.
  • - (2012a). ‘HumanNature and Grammar’. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70, 53-82.
  • - (2012b). ‘Minimalism’. In: R. Kempson, T. Fernando, and N. Asher (eds.), Philosophy of Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 93-141.
  • - (2012c). ‘Phases and semantics’. In: A. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 309-342.
  • - (2012d). ‘The philosophical significance of Universal Grammar’. Language Sciences 34 (5), 635-649.
  • - (2013). ‘Narrow Syntax and the Language of Thought’. Philosophical Psychology 26, 1-23.
  • - (2016). ‘Linguistic Evidence against Predicativism’. Philosophy Compass 11.10, 591-608.

Hinzen, W. and M. Sheehan (2013). The Philosophy of Universal Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hinzen, W., M. Sheehan, and U. Reichard (2014). ‘Intensionality, grammar, and the sententialist hypothesis . In: P. Kosta et al. (eds.), Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315-349.

Hirsch, E. (2016). ‘Three Degrees of Carnapian Tolerance’. In: S. Blatti and S. Lapointe (eds.), Ontology after Carnap. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105-121.

Hochberg, H. (1981). ‘The Wiener-Kuratowski Procedure and the Analysis of Order’. Analysis 41.4, 161-163.

Hole, D. (2005). ‘Reconciling “possessor” datives and “beneficiary” datives—towards a unified voice account of dative binding in German. In: C. Maienborn and A. Wollstein (eds.), Event Arguments in Syntax, Semantics and Discourse. Tubingen: Niemeyer, 213-242.

- (2006). ‘Extra argumentality—affectees, landmarks, and voice. Linguistics 44 (2), 383-424.

Holliday, W. H. (2016a). ‘First-order possibility models and finitary completeness proofs’. In: UC Berkeley Working Papers in Logic and the Methodology of Science. UC Berkeley. url: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8ht6w3kk.

- (2016b). ‘Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic’. In: UC Berkeley Working Papers in Logic and the Methodology of Science. UC Berkeley. url: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/881757qn.

Holmes, R. (1998). Elementary Set Theory with a Universal Set, Louvain-la- Neuve: Cahiers du Centre de Logique, Academia-Bruylant.

Holton, R. (2003). ‘David Lewis’s Philosophy of Language’. Mind and Language

18.3, 286-295.

Hornstein, N. (1998). ‘Movement and Chains’ Syntax 1.2, 99-127.

  • - (1999). ‘Movement and Control’ Linguistic Inquiry 30.1, 69-96.
  • - (2003). ‘On control’ In: R. Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell, 6-81.
  • - (2009). A Theory of Syntax. Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Humberstone, L. (1981). ‘From Worlds to Possibilities. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10.3, 313-339.

  • - (1984). ‘Monadic representability of certain binary relations’. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 29.3, 365376.
  • - (2011). The Connectives, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Hunter, T. (2011). Syntactic Effects of Conjunctivist Semantics. Unifying movement and adjunction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

- (2015). ‘Deconstructing Merge and Move to Make Room for Adjunction. Syntax 18.3, 266-319.

Hutcheson, P. (1987). ‘Transcendental phenomenology and possible worlds semantics’. Husserl Studies 4.3, 225-242.

Hylton, P. (2013). ‘Ideas of a perfectly logical language in analytic philosophy’ In: M. Beaney (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 906-925.

- (2016). ‘Quine’s Philosophies of Language. In: Quine and His Place in History. F. Janssen-Lauret and G. Kemp (eds.). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 103-122.

Iacona, A. (2007). ‘Not Everything is Possible. Logic Journal of the IGPL 15.3, 233-237.

Irurtzun, A. and A. Gallego (2007). ‘Consequences of Pair-Merge at the Interfaces. ASJU: International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 41, 179-200.

Ishii, T. (2016). ‘Transfer as Self Pair-Merge. Bungei Kenkyuu 129, 5-33.

Jespersen, B. (2010). ‘Hyperintensions and procedural isomorphism: Alternative (1/2)’ In: T. Czarnecki et al. (eds.), The Analytical Way. Proceedings of the 6th European Congress of Analytic Philosophy. London: College Publications, 299-320.

Kamp, H. and B. H. Partee (1995). ‘Prototype Theory and Compositionality’ Cognition 57.2, 121-191.

Kanamori, A. (2003). ‘The Empty Set, the Singleton, and the Ordered Pair. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9.3, 273-298.

Kaplan, D. (1964). ‘Foundations of Intensional Logic’. PhD thesis. UCLA.

  • - (1973). ‘Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice’. In: J. Hintikka, J. M. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 490-518.
  • - (1978). ‘Transworld Heir Lines. In: M. J. Loux (ed.), The Possible and the Actual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 88-109.
  • - (2005). ‘Reading ‘On Denoting’ on its Centenary’ Mind 114.456, 933-1003.

Kato, T. et al. (2014). ‘Generalized Search and cyclic derivation by phase: A preliminary study. Sophia Linguistica 61, 203-222.

Kato, T. et al. (2016). ‘On the primitive operations of syntax. In: K. Fujita and C. Boeckx (eds.), Advances in Biolinguistics. The human language faculty and its biological basis. New York-London: Routledge, 29-45.

Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

- (2011). ‘Antisymmetry and the Lexicon’ In: A. M. D. Sciullo and C. Boeckx (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 329-353.

Keenan, E. (1974). ‘The Functional Principle: Generalizing the Notion of “Subject of”’ In: M. W. L. Galy, R. A. Fox, and A. Bruck (eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 298-309. Reprinted in Keenan (1987: 361-374).

- (1987). Universal Grammar: 15 Essays, London: Croom Helm.

Keskinen, A. (2010). ‘Quine’s Critique of Modal Logic and his Conception of Objects. PhD thesis. University of Tampere.

  • - (2012). ‘Quine on Objects: Realism or Anti-Realism?’ Theoria 78.2, 128-145.
  • - (2013). ‘Quine on Objects and De Re Modality’ European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8.2, 4-17.

Kiguchi, H. (2002). ‘Syntax Unchained. PhD thesis. University of Maryland.

King, J. C. (2013). ‘On Fineness of Grain. Philosophical Studies 163.3, 763-781.

Kitahara, H. (1999). ‘Eliminating * as a feature (of traces). In: S. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 77-93.

Klein, U. and W. Sternefeld (2013). ‘Unrestrained в reduction. In: Proceedings of SALT23. T. Snider (ed.). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, 257-275.

- (2016). ‘Same Same But Different: An Alphabetically Innocent Compositional Predicate Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1-31.

Kobele, G. M. (2010a). ‘A Formal Foundation for A and A-bar Movement’. In: C. Ebert, G. Jager, and J. Michaelis (eds.), The Mathematics of Language. Berlin: Springer, 145-159.

- (2010b). ‘Inverse Linking Via Function Composition’ Natural Language Semantics 18.2, 183-196.

Koopman, H. J. and A. Szabolcsi (2000). Verbal complexes, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Koster, J. (2003). ‘Move, Merge and Percolate are One! On the Elimination of Variables in Grammar’. In: L.-O. Delsing et al. (eds.), Grammatik i Fokus. Grammar in Focus: A Festschrift for Christer Platzack. Lund: University of Lund, 227-233.

- (2007). ‘Structure preservingness, internal Merge, and the strict locality of triads’ In: S. Karimi, V. Samiian, and W. K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 188-205.

Koster, J. (2015). Aspects and Beyond: The Case for Generalized Construal’ In: Angel Gallego and D. Ott (eds.), 50 Years Later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL, 159-168. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics No 77.

Kracht, M. and O. Kutz (2002). ‘The Semantics of Modal Predicate Logic I. Counterpart-Frames’. In: Advances in Modal Logic 3. F. Wolter et al. (eds.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 299-320.

  • - (2005). ‘The semantics of modal predicate logic II. Modal individuals revisited’. In: R. Kahle (ed.), Intensionality. Los Angeles: ASL, 60-97.
  • - (2007). ‘Logically possible worlds and counterpart semantics for modal logic. In: D. Jacquette (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 943-996.

Krapova, I. and G. Cinque (2008). ‘On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. In: G. Zybatow et al. (eds.), Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 318-336.

- (2013). ‘DP and CP: a Relativized Minimality approach to one of their non parallelisms’. In: Travaux du 19eme CIL Congres International del Linguistes. S. Departement de Linguistique de l’Universite de Geneve (ed.). Geneve: Departement de Linguistique de l’Universite de Geneve, 1-25.

Kratzer, A. (1995). ‘Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates’. In: G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 125-175.

- (1996). ‘Severing the external argument from its verb. In: J. Rooryck and L. Zar- ing (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109-137.

Krifka, M. et al. (1995). ‘Genericity: An Introduction’. In: G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1-124.

Kripke, S. (1963a). ‘Semantic Considerations on Modal Logic’. Acta Philosophica Fennica 24, 83-94.

  • - (1963b). ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Modal Propositional Calculi. Zeitschrift fur Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9, 67-96.
  • - (1965a). A Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic II: Non-Normal Propositional Calculi. In: J. Addison, L. Henkin, and A. Tarski (eds.), The Theory of Models. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 206-220.
  • - (1965b). ‘Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic I. In: J. N. Crossley and M. A. Dummett (eds.), Formal Systems and Recursive Functions. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 92-130.
  • - (1980). Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (2005). ‘Russell’s Notion of Scope’ Mind 114, 1005-1037.
  • - (2015). ‘Quantified Modality and Essentialism. Nous, 1-14. url: http://dx. doi.org/10.1111/nous.12126.

Kupffer, M. (2000/2010). ‘Counterparts and Qualities. Revised version. PhD thesis. Universitat Konstanz.

Kural, M. and G. Tsoulas (2005). ‘Indices and the Theory of Grammar’ Ms., University of California, Irvine and University of York.

Kuroda, S.-Y. (1979). (W)hole of the doughnut: Syntax and its boundaries, Ghent: E. Story-Scientia.

Ladusaw, W. A. and S. Chung (2012). ‘Compositional asymmetry and the Functional Principle. A theme from Keenan. In: T. Graf et al. (eds.), Theories of Everything In Honor of Ed Keenan. Los Angeles: UCLA, 177-179. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics No 17.

Lahne, A. (2008). ‘Where There is Fire There is Smoke: Local Modelling of Successive-Cyclic Movement. PhD thesis. Universitat Leipzig.

Lakoff, G. (1968). ‘Counterparts, or the Problem of Reference in Transformational Grammar. Ms., Harvard University.

Lambert, K. (1959). ‘Singular Terms and Truth’. Philosophical Studies 10.1, 1-5.

  • - (1963). ‘Quantification and Existence. Inquiry 6.1-4, 319-324.
  • - (1965). ‘On Logic an Existence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 6.2, 135141.
  • - (1967). ‘Free Logic and the Concept of Existence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8.1-2, 133-144.
  • - (1972). ‘Notes on Free Description Theory: Some Philosphical Issues and Consequences’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 1.2, 184-191.
  • - (1974a). ‘Impossible Objects’. Inquiry 17.1-4, 303-314.
  • - (1974b). ‘Predication and Extensionality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 3.3, 255-264.
  • - (1985). ‘Non-Existent Objects’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 25, 439-446.
  • - (1987). ‘On the Philosophical Foundations of Free Description Theory. History and Philosophy of Logic 8.1, 57-66.
  • - (1991). Philosophical Applications of Free Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - (2001). ‘Free Logics. In: L. Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Oxford: Blackwell, 258-279.
  • - (2002). Free Logic: Selected Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lambert, K. and E. Bencivenga (1986). ‘A Free Logic with Simple and Complex

Predicates’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27.2, 247-256.

Larson, B. and N. Hornstein (2012). ‘Copies and Occurrences. Ms., University of Maryland.

Lasnik, H. (1995). ‘Last resort and attract F. In: L. Gabriele, D. Hardison, and R. Westmoreland (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America. Bloomington: Indiana University, 62-81. Reprinted in Lasnik (2003: 22-41).

  • - (1999). ‘Chains of arguments. In: S. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working- min-imalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 189-215.
  • - (2003). Minimalist Investigations in Linguistic Theory, New York: Routledge. Lasnik, H. and M. Saito (1984). ‘On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic

Inquiry 15.2, 235-290.

- (1992). Move a, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Lasnik, H. and J. Uriagereka (2005). A Course in Minimalist Syntax: Foundations and Prospects, Oxford: Blackwell.

Lebeaux, D. (1988). ‘Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar’ PhD thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

- (2000). Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Legate, J. A. (2003). ‘Some Interface Properties of the Phase. Linguistic Inquiry

34.3, 506-516.

Lenci, A. and G. Sandu (2009). ‘Logic and Linguistics in the Twentieth Century’. In: L. Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 775-847.

Lewis, D. K. (1968). ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’. Journal of Philosophy 69, 113-126. Reprinted in Lewis (1983: 26-39).

  • - (1970). ‘General Semantics. Synthese 22.1-2, 18-67.
  • - (1971). ‘Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy 78.7, 203-211.
  • - (1973b). ‘Counterfactuals and Comparative Possibility. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2.4, 418-446.
  • - (1973a). Counterfactuals, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (1975). Adverbs of Quantification’ In: E. L. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 3-15.
  • - (1983). Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • - (1991). Parts of Classes, Oxford: Blackwell.

Lightfoot, D. (1976). ‘Trace Theory and twice moved NPs’ Linguistic Inquiry 7.4, 559-582.

Linsky, B. and E. N. Zalta (1994). ‘In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic’ In: J. E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, Volume 7: Language and Logic. Oxford: Blackwell, 431-458.

Lohndal, T. (2014). Phrase Structure and Argument Structure. A Case Study of the Syntax—Semantics Interface, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lohndal, T. and P. Pietroski (2011). ‘Interrogatives, Instructions, and I-languages: An I-Semantics for Questions. Linguistic Analysis 37.3-4, 458-515.

MacBride, F. (2007). ‘Neutral Relations Revisited. Dialectica 61.1, 25-56.

  • - (2011). ‘Relations and Truthmaking. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
  • 111.1, 161-179.
  • - (2013). ‘How Involved Do You Want to Be in a Non-Symmetric Relationship?’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92.1, 1-16.

Manzini, M. and A. Roussou (2000). ‘A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua 110, 409-447.

Marantz, A. (1997). ‘No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon’. In: A. Dimitriadis et al. (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics vol. 4.2. University of Pennsylvania, 201-225.

- (2000). ‘Words’ Ms., MIT.

  • - (2007). ‘Phases and words’. In: Phases in the theory of grammar. S.-H. Choe (ed.). Seoul: Dong-In Publishing Co., 191-222.
  • - (2013). ‘Locating the verbal root’. Paper presented at the 25th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Iceland.

Marmodoro, A. (2014). Aristotle on Perceiving Objects, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, R. and J. Uriagereka (2014). ‘Chains in Minimalism’. In: P. Kosta et al. (eds.), Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 169-194.

Martin, T. and W. Hinzen (2014). ‘The grammar of the essential indexical’. Lingua 148, 95-117.

Mates, B. (1972). Elementary Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Matushansky, O. (2006). ‘Head Movement in Linguistic Theory’. Linguistic Inquiry 37.1, 69-109.

May, R. (1985). Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

McClure, W. (1999). ‘Japanese floating classifiers’. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. J. Alexander, N.-R. Han, and M. M. Fox (eds.). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 111-125.

Meyer, R. K. and K. Lambert (1968). ‘Universally Free Logic and Standard Quantification Theory’. Journal of Symbolic Logic 33.1, 8-26.

Milsark, G. (1974). ‘Existential Sentences in English. PhD thesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Mohanty, J. N. (1981). ‘Intentionality and’ Possible Worlds’’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 35.1, 91.

Moltmann, F. (1992). ‘Coordination and comparatives. PhD thesis. MIT.

Montague, R. (1969). ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’. The Monist 53, 159-194. Reprinted in Montague (1974: 148-187).

  • - (1970a). ‘English as a Formal Language. In: B. Visentini (ed.), Linguaggi nella Societa e nella Tecnica. Milan: Edizioni di Communita, 189-224. Reprinted in Montague (1974: 188-221).
  • - (1970b). ‘Universal Grammar. Theoria 36, 373-398. Reprinted in Montague (1974: 222-246).
  • - (1973a). ‘Comments on Moravcsik’s Paper. In: J. Hintikka, J. M. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 289-294. Reprinted as Montague (1979).
  • - (1973b). ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’. In: J. Hintikka, J. M. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 221-242. Reprinted in Montague (1974: 246-270).
  • - (1974). Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. Edited, with an introduction, by Richmond Thomason.
  • - (1979). ‘The Proper Treatment of Mass Terms in English. In: F. J. Pelletier (ed.), Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems. Dordrecht: Reidel, 173-178.

Moro, A. (1997a). ‘Dynamic Antisymmetry: Movement as a Symmetry-breaking Phenomenon. Studia Linguistica 51.1, 50-76.

  • - (1997b). The raising of predicates: predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • - (2000). Dynamic Antisymmetry, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (2016a). I Speak, Therefore I Am : Seventeen Thoughts About Language, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • - (2016b). Impossible Languages, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Morzycki, M. (2016). Modification, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Muller, G. (2011). Constraints on Displacement: A phase-based approach, John

Benjamins Publishing Company.

Muller, T. (2012). ‘Indeterminism and Persistence. Philosophia Naturalis 49.1, 113-136.

- (2014). ‘Things in Possible Experiments: Case-Intensional Logic as a Framework for Tracing Things from Case to Case.. In: C. M. Galavotti et al. (eds.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. Berlin: Springer, 3-14.

Munn, A. (1992). ‘A Null Operator Analysis of ATB Gaps. The Linguistic Review

  • 9.1, 1-26.
  • - (1993). ‘Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures’. PhD thesis. The University of Maryland.

Musan, R. (1995). ‘On the Temporal Interpretation of Noun Phrases.. PhD thesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • - (1997). ‘Tense, Predicates, and Lifetime Effects. Natural Language Semantics
  • 5.3, 271-301.
  • - (1999). ‘Temporal interpretation and information-status of noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 22.6, 621-661.

Narita, H. (2014). Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Narita, H. and N. Fukui (2016). ‘Feature-equilibria in syntax’. In: K. Fujita and C. Boeckx (eds.), Advances in Biolinguistics. The human language faculty and its biological basis. New York-London: Routledge, 9-28.

Neeleman, A. and H. van de Koot (2010). ‘A Local Encoding of Syntactic Dependencies and its Consequences for the Theory of Movement’. Syntax 13.4, 331-372.

Nissenbaum, J. (2000). ‘Covert movement and parasitic gaps’. In: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society. M. Hirotani et al. (eds.). Rutgers University: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, 541-556.

Nomura, M. (2015). ‘On pair-Merge’. Ms., Chukyo University.

Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

- (2011). ‘The Copy Theory’. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143-171.

Obata, M. (2010). ‘Root, Successive-Cyclic and Feature-Splitting Internal Merge: Implications for Feature-Inheritance and Transfer’. PhD thesis. University of Michigan.

- (2012). ‘Feature-splitting Internal Merge and its implications for the elimination of A/A'-position types’. In: A. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 173-194.

Obata, M. and S. Epstein (2011). ‘Feature-Splitting Internal Merge: Improper Movement, Intervention, and the A/A' Distinction. Syntax 14.2, 122-147.

Oliver, A. (2010). ‘What is a predicate?’ In: T. Ricketts and M. D. Potter (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge University Press, 118-148.

Orilia, F. (2000). Argument Deletion, Thematic Roles, and Leibniz’s Logico- Grammatical Analysis of Relations’. History and Philosophy of Logic 21.2, 147-162.

  • - (2009). ‘The problem of order in relational states of affairs: a Leibnizian view. In: R. Egidi and G. Bonino (eds.), Fostering the Ontological Turn: Gustav Berg- mann (1906-1987). Frankfurt-Paris-Lancaster-New Brunswick: Ontos Ver- lag, 161-185.
  • - (2011). ‘Relational Order and Onto-Thematic Roles’. Metaphysica 12.1, 1-18.
  • - (2014). ‘Positions, Ordering Relations and O-Roles’. Dialectica 68.2, 283-303.

Ormazabal, J. (1995). ‘The syntax of complementation: On the connection between syntactic structure and selection’. PhD thesis. University of Connecticut.

Oseki, Y. (2015). ‘Eliminating Pair-Merge. In: Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. U. Steindl et al. (eds.). Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press, 303-312.

Otsuka, Y. (2010). ‘Genitive relative constructions and agent incorporation in- Tongan’. In: R. Mercado, E. Potsdam, and L. deMena Travis (eds.), Austrone- sian and Theoretical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 117-140.

Ott, D. (2010). ‘Grammatically, interfaces, and UG. In: M. T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 89-104.

- (2012). Local instability: Split topicalization and quantifier float in German, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Ouali, H. (2008). ‘On C-to-T ^-feature transfer: The nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement in Berber’ In: R. D’Alessandro, S. Fischer, and G. H. Hrafn- bjargarson (eds.), Agreement Restrictions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 159-180.

Ouali, H. (2010). ‘Computation efficiency and feature inheritance in crash-proof syntax’. In: M. T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 15-30.

Overgaard, S. (2008). ‘How to Analyze Immediate Experience: Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39.3, 282-304.

Paoletti, M. P. (2016). ‘Non-Symmetrical Relations, O-Roles, and Modes’ Acta Analytica 31.4, 373-395.

Parsons, T. (1995). ‘Meinongian Semantics Generalized’. Grazer Philosophische Studien 50, 145-161.

  • - (2008). ‘The Development of Supposition Theory in the Later 12th through 14th Centuries’. In: D. M. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 157-280.
  • - (2014). Articulating Medieval Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Partee, B. H. (2010). ‘Privative Adjectives: Subsective Plus Coercion. In: Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays Offered to Hans Kamp. Leiden: Brill, 273-285.

- (2015). Asking What a Meaning Does. David Lewis’s Contributions to Semantics’. In: B. Loewer and J. Schaffer (eds.), A Companion to David Lewis. Ox- ford/New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 328-344.

Partee, B. H. and H. L. Hendriks (2011). ‘Montague Grammar. In: J. van Ben- them and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 3-94.

Pesetsky, D. and E. Torrego (2007). ‘The syntax of valuation and the interpret- ability of features. In: K. Simin, V Samiian, and W. K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 262-294.

Piattelli-Palmarini, M., J. Uriagereka, and P. S. Etxeberria, eds. (2009). Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pickel, B. (2010). ‘Syntax in Basic Laws §§ 29-32’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51.2, 253-277.

- (2014). ‘Complex Predication and the Metaphysics of Properties’. Dialectica 68.2, 209-230.

Pickel, B. and B. Rabern (2016). ‘The Antinomy of the Variable: A Tarskian Resolution’. Journal of Philosophy 113.3, 137-170.

Pietroski, P. (2005). Events and Semantic Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • - (2006). ‘Interpreting concatenation and concatenates’. Philosophical Issues
  • 16.1, 221-245.
  • - (2010). ‘Concepts, meanings and truth: First nature, second nature and hard work’. Mind and Language 25.3, 247-278.
  • - (2011). ‘Minimal Semantic Instructions. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 472-497.
  • - (2012a). ‘Language and Conceptual Reanalysis’. In: A. M. D. Sciullo (ed.), Towards a Biolinguistic Understanding of Grammar. Essays on interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57-86.
  • - (2012b). ‘Semantic Monadicity with Conceptual Polyadicity. In: M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129-148.
  • - (2014a). ‘Conjoining Meanings: Semantics Without Truth Values. To appear with Oxford University Press.
  • - (2014b). Describing I-junction. ProtoSociology. An International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 31, 121-137.

Pietroski, P. and N. Hornstein (2009). ‘Basic Operations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8, 113-139.

Plantinga, A. (1974). The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Platzack, C. (2013). ‘Head Movement as a Phonological Operation. In: L. L.-S. Cheng and N. Corver (eds.), Diagnosing Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21-43.

Preminger, O. (2014). Agreement and Its Failures, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Progovac, L. (2015). Evolutionary Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Putnam, H. (2013). ‘Comments on Charles Parsons. In: M. Baghramian (ed.), Reading Putnam. New York-London: Routledge, 202-204.

Putnam, M. T. and T. Stroik (2010). ‘Syntactic relations in Survive-minimalism. In: M. T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143-166.

Quine, W. v. O. (1948). ‘On What There Is’. Review of Metaphysics 2, 21-38.

  • - (1951). Mathematical Logic, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (1960). Word and object, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (1972). ‘Methodological Reflections on Current Linguistic Theory’. In: D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 442-454.
  • - (1973). The Roots of Reference, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
  • - (1976). ‘Worlds Away’ Journal of Philosophy 73.22, 859-863.
  • - (1987). Quiddities: an intermittently philosophical dictionary, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (1992a). Pursuit of Truth: Revised Edition, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (1992b). ‘Structure and Nature’ Journal of Philosophy 89.1, 5-9.
  • - (1993). ‘In Praise of Observation Sentences’. Journal of Philosophy 60.3, 107116.
  • - (1995). From stimulus to science, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • - (1998). ‘Reply to Jaakko Hintikka’. In: L. E. Hahn and P. A. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W. v. O. Quine. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 227-228.

Ramachandran, M. (1989). ‘An Alternative Translation Scheme for Counterpart Theory’. Analysis 49.3, 131-141.

  • - (1990). ‘Contingent Identity in Counterpart Theory. Analysis 50.3, 163-166.
  • - (1998). ‘Sortal Modal Logic and Counterpart Theory’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76.4, 553-565.
  • - (2003). ‘Contingent Identity and Kripkean Counterpart Theory. In: T. Childers and O. Majer (eds.), Logica Yearbook 2002. Praha: Filosofia, 207-219.
  • - (2008). ‘Kripkean Counterpart Theory. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2.2, 89-106.

Raposo, E. (2002). ‘Nominal Gaps with Prepositional Modifiers in Spanish and

Portuguese: A Case for Quick Spell-Out. Cuadernos de Lingtitstica del Insti- tuto Universitario Ortega y Gasset 9, 127-144.

Reichard, U. (2012). ‘Making Events Redundant: Adnominal Modification and Phases. In: P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical and Formal Approaches to Linguistic Analysis. Frankfurt-Paris-Lancaster-New Brunswick: Ontos Verlag, 429-455.

Reichard, U. and W. Hinzen (2016). ‘Are Verbs Names of Events? A Review of the Event-argument Hypothesis’. In: P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical and Linguistic Analyses of Reference. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 43-64.

Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface Strategies: Reference-set Computation, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

- (2016). Concepts, Syntax, and Their Interface: The Theta System, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Richards, M. (2007). ‘On Feature Inheritance: An Argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition’. Linguistic Inquiry 38.3, 563-572.

  • - (2009). ‘Internal Pair-Merge: the Missing Mode of Movement’. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8, 55-73.
  • - (2011). ‘Deriving the Edge: What’s in a Phase?’ Syntax 14.1, 74-95.
  • - (2012a). ‘On feature inheritance, defective phases, and the movement-morphology connection’. In: A. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin-New York: Walter De Gruyter, 195-232.
  • - (2012b). ‘Probing the Past: On Reconciling Long-Distance Agreement with the PIC’. In: A. Alexiadou, T. Kiss, and G. Muller (eds.), Local Modelling of NonLocal Dependencies in Syntax. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, 135-154.

Richardson, A. (1994). ‘Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 68.1, 67-83.

- (2012). ‘Carnap’s Place in Analytic Philosophy and Philosophy of Science. In: P. Wagner (ed.), Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism. New York: Pal- grave Macmillan, 7-22.

Rizzi, L. (1997). ‘The fine structure of the left periphery. In: L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 281-337.

  • - (2015a). ‘Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In: U. Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond Functional Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 314-338.
  • - (2015b). ‘Notes on labeling and subject positions’. In: E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, and S. Matteini (eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17-46.
  • - (2016). ‘Labeling, maximality and the head-phrase distinction. The Linguistic Review 33, 103-127.

Rizzi, L. and G. Cinque (2010). ‘The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. In: B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51-65.

- (2016). ‘Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory’. Annual Review of Linguistics 2, 139-163.

Roberts, I. (2001). ‘Head Movement’. In: M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 113-147.

  • - (2010). Agreement and Head Movement. Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • - (2011). ‘Head-Movement and the Minimalist Program’. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195-219.

Rodrigues, C. (2004). ‘Thematic chains’. DELTA: Documentagao de Estudos em Lingtitstica Teorica e Aplicada 20.1, 123-147.

Russell, B. (1986). ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’. In: J. G. Slater (ed.), The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays 1914-19. London: Allen & Unwin, 157-244.

Ruys, E. G. (2015). ‘A Minimalist Condition on Semantic Reconstruction’. Linguistic Inquiry 46 (3), 453-488.

Salmon, N. (2010). ‘Lambda in sentences with designators: an ode to complex predication’. The Journal of Philosophy 107 (9), 445-468.

Sauerland, U. (2003). ‘Intermediate Adjunction with A-Movement’. Linguistic Inquiry 34.2, 308-313.

  • - (2007). ‘Flat Binding. In: U. Sauerland and H.-M. Gartner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 197-254.
  • - (2014). ‘Counterparts Block Some ‘De Re’ Readings. In: L. Crnic and U. Sauerland (eds.), The Art and Craft of Semantics: A Festschrift for Irene Heim, vol. 2. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL, 65-85. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics No 71.

Schwarz, W. (2012). ‘How Things Are Elsewhere. In: G. Restall and G. Russell (eds.), New Waves in Philosophical Logic. London: Palgrave, 8-29.

Scott, D. S. (1970). ‘Advice on Modal Logic. In: K. Lambert (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel, 143-173.

Seely, T. D. (2006). ‘Merge, derivational C-command, and subcategorization in a label-free syntax’. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist Essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 182-217.

Sheehan, M. and W. Hinzen (2011). ‘Moving towards the edge’. Linguistic Analysis 37.3-4, 405-458.

Sher, G. (2016). Epistemic Friction. An Essay on Knowledge, Truth, and Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shim, J.-Y. and S. D. Epstein (2015). ‘Two Notes on Possible Approaches to the Unification of Theta Relations. Linguistic Analysis 40.1-2, 1-18.

Shlonsky, U. (2010). ‘The Cartographic Enterprise in Syntax’. Language and Linguistics Compass 4.6, 417-429.

Smith, D. W. (1983). ‘Kantifying In’. Synthese 54.2, 261-273.

Smith, D. W. and R. McIntyre (1982). Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language, Berlin and New York: Springer.

Solt, S. (2009). ‘The semantics of adjectives of quantity’. PhD thesis. New York: The City University of New York.

Spelke, E. S. (2003). ‘What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language’. In: D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Investigation of Language and Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 277-311.

Sportiche, D. (2016). ‘Neglect (or doing away with Late Merger and Countercyclicity)’. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.

Stabler, E. (1997). ‘Derivational minimalism’. In: C. Retore (ed.), Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: First International Conference, LACV 96 Nancy, France, September 23-25, 1996 Selected Papers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 68-95.

  • - (1998). Acquiring Languages with Movement’. Syntax 1.1, 72-97.
  • - (2001). ‘Recognizing Head Movement’. In: P. de Groote, G. Morrill, and C. Retore (eds.), Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. Berlin: Springer, 245-260.
  • - (2011). ‘Computational perspectives on minimalism’. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 617-646.

Stalnaker, R. (1977). ‘Complex Predicates’. The Monist 60.3, 327-339.

Stalnaker, R. and R. Thomason (1968). Abstraction in First-Order Modal Logic’. Theoria 34.3, 203-207.

Stroik, T. (1999). ‘The survive principle’. Linguistic Analysis 29, 278-303.

- (2009). Locality in Minimalist Syntax, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Stroik, T. and M. Putnam (2013). The Structural Design of Language, Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Sullivan, A. (2014). ‘On the Semantic Relevance of Romanovs. In: P Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Semantics and Beyond. Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries. Berlin-New York: Walter De Gruyter, 255-270.

Sullivan, P M. (2010). ‘Michael Dummett’s Frege’. In: T. Ricketts and M. D. Potter (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86-117.

Suranyi, B. (2008). ‘Cyclic Spell Out and reprojection in head movement’. In: J. M. Hartmann, V. Hegedus, and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 293-337.

Tarski, A. (1933). Pojqcie prawdy w jgzykach nauk dedukcyjnych, Warszawa: To- warzystwo Naukowe Warszawskie.

  • - (1935). ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’ Studia Philo- sophica 1, 261-305.
  • - (1956). Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Thomason, R. H. (1969). ‘Modal Logic and Metaphysics’. In: K. Lambert (ed.),

The Logical Way of Doing Things. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 119-146.

Thomason, R. H. and R. C. Stalnaker (1968). ‘Modality and Reference. Nous 2.4, 359-372.

- (1973). ‘A Semantic Theory of Adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 4.2, 195-220.

Trotzke, A. and J.-W. Zwart (2014). ‘The complexity of narrow syntax: Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest Merge’ In: F. J. Newmeyer and L. B. Preston (eds.), Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128-147.

Truswell, R. (2011). Events, Phrases, and Questions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tselishchev, V. (1977). ‘Some Philosophical Problems of Hintikka’s Possible Worlds Semantics. In: R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Logic, Foundations of Mathematics, and Computability Theory: Part One of the Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London, Ontario, Canada-1975. Dordrecht: Reidel, 391-403.

- (1979). ‘Hintikka’s Possible Worlds and Rigid Designators’ In: J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto, and E. Saarinen (eds.), Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic: Proceedings of the Fourth Scandinavian Logic Symposium and of the First Soviet-Finnish Logic Conference, Jyvaskyla, Finland, June 29—July 6, 1976. Dordrecht: Reidel, 387-399.

Tulenheimo, T. (2009). ‘Remarks on Individuals in Modal Contexts. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4, 383-394.

Uckelman, S. L. (2013). ‘A Quantified Temporal Logic for Ampliation and Restriction’ Vivarium 51.1-4, 485-510.

Uriagereka, J. (1998). Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

  • - (1999). ‘Multiple spell-out’. In: S. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 251-282. Reprinted in Uriagereka (2002: 45-65).
  • - (2002). Derivations. Exploring the dynamics of syntax, London and New York: Routledge.
  • - (2008). Syntactic Anchors. On Semantic Structuring, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • - (2012). Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wurmbrand, S. (2001). Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure, Mouton de Gruyter.

  • - (2014a). ‘Tense and Aspect in English Infinitives’. Linguistic Inquiry 45.3, 403447.
  • - (2014b). ‘The Merge Condition: A syntactic approach to selection. In: P. Kosta et al. (eds.), Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 130-166.

Yang, D.-W. (2013). ‘Non-determinism and the Derivational Null Hypothesis. Studies in Generative Grammar 23.4, 709-726.

  • - (2014). ‘The Global Nature of the Interpretive Effects of Merge. Studies in Generative Grammar 24.1, 63-81.
  • - (2015). ‘The Notion of Null Hypothesis in Generative Grammar. Studies in Generative Grammar 25.2, 413-425.

Yanovich, I. (2015). ‘Expressive Power of “Now” and “Then” Operators. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24.1, 65-93.

Zhang, N. (2009). Coordination in Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zwart, C. J.-W. (2001). ‘Syntactic and Phonological Verb Movement. Syntax 4.1, 34-62.

van Leeuwen, J. (1991). ‘Individuals and sortal concepts: An Essay in Logical Descriptive Metaphysics’. PhD thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

van Urk, C. (2015). ‘A uniform syntax for phrasal movement: A case study of Dinka Bor. PhD thesis. MIT.

 
Source
< Prev   CONTENTS   Source

Related topics